SIBYLLE: A system for alternative communication adapting to the context and its user

ASSETS'07: Proceedings of the Ninth International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 203-210

  Wandmacher, Tonio ^a   Antoine, Jean Yves ^a   Poirier, Franck ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ EUROPÉENNE DE BRETAGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Augmentative and alternative communication; Keystroke saving rate; Latent semantic analysis; User adaptation; Virtual keyboard; Word prediction

Indexed keywords

HANDICAPPED PERSONS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH SYNTHESIS; USER INTERFACES;

AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION; KEYSTROKE SAVING RATE; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; USER ADAPTATION; VIRTUAL KEYBOARDS; WORD PREDICTION;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 42149136842     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1296843.1296878     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Trost, H., Matiasek, J. and Baroni, M. The Language Component of the FASTY Text Prediction System, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(8), pp. 743-781. 2005
2. th Annual ACMsymposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST2000, San Diego, CA. pp. 129-137. 2000.
3. th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, ICCHP'04. Paris, France, pp. 1109-1015. 2004.
4. Trnka, K., Yarrington, D. McCoy, K F. and Pennington, C. The Effects of Word Prediction on Communication Rate for AAC. Proceedings of NAACL HLT'2007, Rochester, pp. 173-176. 2007.
5. st International Conference UAHCI. New-Orleans, USA.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, p. 895-899, august 2001.
6. Trnka, K., Yarrington, D. McCoy, K F. and Pennington, C. Topic Modeling in Fringe Word Prediction for AAC. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces., Sydney, Australia, pp. 276-278. 2006.
7. Jelinek, F. Self-organized Language Models for Speech Recognition. In: A. Waibel and K.-F. Lee (eds.) Readings in Speech Recognition, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, pp. 450-506. 1990.
8. Deerwester, S. C., Dumais, S., Landauer, T., Furnas, G. and Harshman, R Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, JASIS 41 (6), pp. 391-407. 1990.
9. Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., Rehder, B. and Schreiner, M. E. How well can passage meaning be derived without using word order? A comparison of LSA and humans", Proceedings of the 19th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. pp. 412-417, Erlbaum Mawhwah, NJ. 1997.
10. Coccaro, N. and Jurafsky, D. Towards better integration of semantic predictors in statistical language modeling, Proc. of the Intl. Conf. Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP-98. Sydney, Australia, paper 0852. 1998.
11. Wandmacher T. How semantic is Latent Semantic Analysis?, Proc. TALN/RECITAL'2005, Dourdan, France. 6-10 june 2005.
12. Wandmacher, T. and Antoine, J.-Y. Methods to integrate a language model with semantic information for a word prediction component. To appear in: Proceedings of EMNLP-2007, Prague, Czech Republic, 2007.
13. Rosenfeld, R. A maximum entropy approach to adaptive statistical language modelling. Computer Speech and Language, 10(1), pp. 187-228, 1996.
14. Church, K. and Hanks, P. Word association norms, mutual information and lexicography. Proc. 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL'89. Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 76-83. 1989.
15. Li, J. and Hirst, G. Semantic knowledge in a word completion task. Proceedings of the 7 Int. ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and Accessibility, Baltimore, MD, USA. pp. 121-128. 2005.
16. Stoicke, Andreas SRILM - An Extensible Language Modeling Toolkit, Proceedings of the Intl. Conf. Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP'2002, Denver, Colorado, vol. 2, pp. 901-904. September 2002
17. Goodman, J. A Bit of Progress in Language Modeling, Extended Version Microsoft Research Technical Report MSRTR-2001-72.2001.
18. Stoicke, A. Entropy-based pruning of backoff language models". Proceedings of the DARPA Broadcast News Transcription and Understanding Workshop, Lansdowne, VA. pp. 270-274 1998
19. th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC'06, Genova, Italy, 2006.
20. Clarkson, P. R. and Robinson, A.J. Language Model Adaptation using Mixtures and an Exponentially Decaying Cache. In: Proc. of the IEEE ICASSP-97, Munich, 1997.
21. Berard C., Neimeijer D. Evaluating effort reduction through different word prediction systems. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, La Haye NL. Vol. 3, pp. 2658-2663. oct. 2004.
22. Carlberger A., Carlberger J., Magnuson T., Hunnicutt M.S., Palazuelos-Cagigas S., Navarro S.A. Profet, a new generation of word prediction : an evaluation study. Proc. Natural Language Processing for Communication Aids, NLPCA '1997. Madrid, Spain, pp. 23-28. 1997
23. Biard N., Dumas C., Bouteille J., Pozzi D., Lofaso F., Laffont I., Apports de l'évaluation en situation de vie àpartir d'une étude sur l'intérêt de la prédiction de mots auprès d'utilisateurs de synthèse vocale, Proceedings Handicap 2006, Paris, France. 145-148. 2006.