Globalization, entrepreneurship, and public policy: A systems view

Industry and Innovation

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 103-116

  Carlsson, Bo ^a   Mudambi, Ram ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTREPRENEUR; GLOBALIZATION; HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL AGGLOMERATION; INNOVATION;

EID: 0037368016     PISSN: 13662716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1366271032000068122     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. 1990a: The Economics of Small Firms: A European Challenge. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. 1900b: Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Acs, Z.J. and Tarpley, F.A., Jr 1998: The angel capital electronic network (ACE-Net), Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(6-8) (August): 793-797.
4. Almeida, P. and Kogut, B. 1997: The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation, Small Business Economics, 9: 21-31.
5. Becker, G.S. 2000: Global Silicon Valleys? First kill all subsidies, BusinessWeek, 3674 (27 March): 26.
6. Bleaney, M.F., Binks, M.R., Greenaway, D., Reed, G.V. and Whynes, D.K. 1992. What does a university add to its local economy?, Applied Economics, 24(3) (March): 305-311.
7. Cantwell, J.A. 1994: Transnational Corporations and Innovatory Activities. London: Routledge.
8. Cantwell, J.A. 1995: The globalization of technology: what remains of the product cycle model?, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1) (February): 155-174.
9. Cantwell, J.A. and Iammarino, S. 1998: MNCs, technological innovation and regional systems in the EU: some evidence in the Italian case, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 5(3): 383-408.
10. Cantwell, J.A. and Janne, O. 1999: Technological globalization and innovative centers: the role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy, Research Policy, 28(2-3) (March): 119-144.
11. Cantwell, J.A. and Piscitello, L. 2000: Accumulating technological competence: its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalization, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(1): 21-51.
12. Carlsson, B. 1992: The rise of small business: causes and consequences, in W.J. Adams (ed.), Singular Europe: Economy and Polity of the European Community after 1992. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
13. Carlsson, B. (ed.) 1995: Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Case of Factory Automation. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. Carlsson, B. (ed.) 1997: Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Carlsson, B. (ed.) 2002: Technological Systems in the Bio Industries: An International Study. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Carlsson, B. and Fridh, A.-C. 2002: Technology transfer in U.S. universities: a survey and statistical analysis, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1-2): 199-232.
17. Casson, M.C. 1997: Entrepreneurial networks in international business, Business and Economic History, 26(2): 811-823.
18. Castells, M. and Hall, P. 1994: Technopoles of the World: The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes. New York: Routledge.
19. Castronovo, V. 1996: Biella: history runs along a woolen thread, Arrividerci, VII(75): 32-37.
20. Chesnais, F. 1988: Technical co-operation agreements between firms, Science Technology Industry Review, 4: 57-119.
21. Choi, J.P. 1997: Herd behavior, the penguin effect and the suppression of informational diffusion: an analysis of informational externalities and payoff interdependency, Rand Journal of Economics, 28(3): 407-425.
22. Coombs, J.E., Deeds, D.L. and Mudambi, R. 2000: An examination of the antecedents of equity and non-equity investments into US biotechnology firms by foreign and domestic corporate partners. Proceedings of the Academy of Management Meetings, Toronto.
23. De Bondt, R. 1997: Spillovers and innovative activities, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(1): 1-28.
24. de la Mothe, J. and Paquet, G. (eds.) 1998: Local and Regional Systems of Innovation. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. DeCarolis, D. and Deeds, D.L. 1999: The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry, Strategic Management Journal, 20: 953-968.
26. Deeds, D.L. and Mudambi, R. 1999: A model of the entrepreneurial finance cycle. Working Paper, Case Western Reserve University.
27. Deeds, D.L., Frandsen, M. and Mang, P. 1999: The impact of industry and organizational legitimacy on the flow of capital into high technology new ventures. Working Paper, Case Western Reserve University.
28. Eden, L., Levitas, E. and Martinez, R.J. 1997: The production, transfer and spillover of technology: comparing large and small multinationals as technology producers, Small Business Economics, 9(1): 53-66.
29. Eliasson, G. and Eliasson, A. 1997: The pharmaceutical and biotechnology competence bloc and the development of Losec, in B. Carlsson (ed.), Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics, pp. 139-168. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer.
30. Fenn, G.W. and Liang, N. 1998: New resources and new ideas: private equity for small businesses, Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(6-8) (August): 1077-1084.
31. Freear, J., Sohl, J.E. and Wetzel, W.E., Jr 1994: Angels and non-angels: are there differences?, Journal of Business Venturing, 9: 109-123.
32. Galambos, L. and Sewell, J.E. 1996: Networks of Innovation: Vaccine Development at Merck, Sharp & Dohme, and Mulford, 1895-1995. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Gompers, P. and Lerner, J. 1999: The Venture Capital Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Granstrand, O. and Sjölander, S. 1990: Managing innovation in multi-technology corporations, Research Policy, 19: 35-60.
35. Granstrand, O. and Sjölander, S. 1992: Internationalization and diversification of multi-technology corporations, in O. Granstrand, L. Hākanson and S. Sjölander (eds.), Technology Management and International Business. Internationalization of R/D and Technology. Chichester: John Wiley.
36. Guisinger, S. 1986: Do performance requirements and investment incentives work?, The World Economy, 9(1): 79-96.
37. Harrison, R. and Mason, C. 1993: Finance for the growing business: the role of informal investment, National Westminster Bank Quarterly Review (May): 17-29.
38. Hill, E.W. and Brennan, J.F. 2000: A methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters: the foundation of regional competitive advantage, Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1): 65-97.
39. Hoover, E.M. 1937: Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Hoover, E.M. 1948: The Location of Economic Activity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
41. Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R. 1993: Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577-598.
42. Kenney, M. and von Burg, U. 1999: Technology, entrepreneurship and path dependence: industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1): 67-103.
43. Lerner, J. 1998: "Angel" financing and public policy: an overview, Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(6-8) (August): 773-783.
44. Lerner, J. 1999: The government as venture capitalist: the long-run impact of the SBIR program, Journal of Business, 72(3) (July): 285-318.
45. Loveman, G. and Sengenberger, W. 1991: The re-emergence of small-scale production: an international comparison, Small Business Economics, 3(1): 1-37.
46. Marshall, A. 1923: Industry and Trade: A Study of Industrial Technique and Business Organization, and of their Influences on the Conditions of Various Classes and Nations. London: Macmillan.
47. Mason, N. 1991: Muslin dress: 18th century, Poetry Wales, 27(1): 60.
48. Mudambi, R. 1998: The role of duration in MNE investment strategies, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(2): 239-262.
49. Muniagurria M F. and Singh, N. 1997: Foreign technology spillovers and R and D policy. International Economic Review, 38(2): 405-430.
50. Narula, R. 2000: Explaining 'inertia' in R and D internationalization: Norwegian firms and the role of home-country effects. Working Paper, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
51. Odagiri, H., Nakamura, Y. and Shibuya, M. 1997: Research consortia as a vehicle for basic research: the case of the fifth generation computer project in Japan, Research Policy, 26(2): 191-207.
52. Papanastassiou, M. and Pearce, R.D. 1997: Technology sourcing and the strategic roles of manufacturing subsidiaries in the U.K.: local competences and global competitiveness, Management International Review, 37(1): 5-25.
53. Pavitt, K. 1998: Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: what Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn't, Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3): 433-452.
54. Pearce, R.D. 1999: Decentralized R and D and strategic competitiveness: globalised approaches to generation and use of technology in multinational enterprises, Research Policy, 28(2-3) (March): 157-178.
55. Porter, M.E. 1990: The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.
56. Prowse, S. 1998: Angel investors and the market for angel investments. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22: 785-792.
57. Raut, L.K. 1995: R and D spillover and productivity growth: evidence from Indian private firms, Journal of Development Economics, 48(1): 1-23.
58. Rugman, A. 1999: Multinational enterprises and the end of global strategy. Proceedings of the 25th European International Business Association (EIBA) Conference, UMIST, Manchester.
59. Rugman, A.M. and D'Cruz, J.R. 1997: The theory of the flagship firm, European Management Review, 15(4) (August): 403-411.
60. Sabety, J.P. and Griffin, J.M. 1996: Pro-competitive alliances: new vehicles for regional, state, and community based economic development, Economic Development Review, 14(2) (Spring): 2-6.
61. Sabourin, V. and Pinsonneault, I. 1997: Strategic formation of competitive high technology clusters, International Journal of Technology Management, 13(2): 165-178.
62. Sanchez, A.M. and Perez, O.U. 1998: Entrepreneurship networks and high technology firms: the case of Aragon, Technovation, 18(5): 335-345.
63. Saxenian, A. 1994: Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64. Saxenian, A. 1999: Comment on Kenney and von Burg, Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1): 105-110.
65. SPRU 1999: Annual Report. University of Sussex: Science Policy Research Unit.
66. UNCTAD 1999: World Investment Report: FDI and the Challenge of Development. Geneva: UNCTAD.
67. Van Reenen, J. 1997: Employment and technological innovation: evidence from UK manufacturing firms, Journal of Labor Economics, 15(2): 255-284.
68. Varga, A. 1998: University Research and Regional Innovation: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Academic Technology Transfers. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
69. Vonortas, N.S. 1997: Cooperation in Research and Development. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
70. Walcott, S.M. 1999: High tech in the deep South: biomedical firm clusters in metropolitan Atlanta, Growth and Change, 30(1): 48-74.
71. Young, S., Hood, N. and Wilson, A. 1994: Targeting policy as a competitive strategy for European inward investment agencies, European Urban and Regional Studies, 1(2): 143-159.
72. Zider, B. 1998: How venture capital works, Harvard Business Review, 76(6) (November-December): 131-139.