Chiral functionalization of optically inactive monolayer-protected silver nanoclusters by chiral ligand-exchange reactions

Langmuir

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 2759-2766

  Nishida, Naoki ^a   Yao, Hiroshi ^a   Kimura, Keisaku ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HYOGO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHIRALITY; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; GEL PERMEATION CHROMATOGRAPHY; LIGANDS; MONOLAYERS; SILVER;

CHIRAL FUNCTIONALIZATION; LIGAND EXCHANGE REACTION;

NANOCLUSTERS;

EID: 42149101991     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la703351p     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. (a) Fendler, J. H. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 3196.
2. (b) Daniel, M.-C.; Astruc, D. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 293.
3. (a) Chen, S.; Ingram, R. S.; Hostetler, M. J.; Pietron, J. J.; Murray, R. W.; Schaaff, T. G.; Khoury, J. T.; Alvarez, M. M.; Whetten, R. L. Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 1998, 280, 2098.
4. (b) Schwerdtfeger, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1892.
5. (c) Whetten, R. L.; Shafigullin, M. N.; Khoury, J. T.; Schaaff, T. G.; Vezmar, I.; Alvarez, M. M.; Wilkinson, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 397.
6. (d) Huang, T.; Murray, R. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 12498.
7. (a) Kubo, R. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1962, 17, 975.
8. (b) Sanchez, A.; Abbet, S.; Heiz, U.; Schneider, W.-D.; Häkkinen, H.; Barnett, R. N.; Landman, U. J. Phys. Chem A 1999, 103, 9573.
9. (c) Menard, L. D.; Gao, S.-P.; Xu, H.; Twesten, R. D.; Harper, A. S.; Song, Y.; Wang, G.; Douglas, A. D.; Yang, J. C.; Frenkel, A. I.; Nuzzo, R. G.; Murray, R. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 12874.
10. (a) Garzón, I. L.; Reyes-Nava, J. A.; Rodríguez- Hernández, J. I.; Sigal, I.; Beltrán, M. R.; Michaelian, R. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2002, 66, 73403.
11. (b) Garzón, I. L.; Beltrán, M. R.; González, G.; Gutíerrez-González, I.; Michaelian, K.; Reyes-Nava, J. A.; Rodríguez-Hernández, J. I. Eur. Phys. J. D 2003, 24, 105.
12. (c) Román-Velázquez, C. E.; Noguez, C.; Garzón, I. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 12035.
13. (a) Schaaff, T. G.; Knight, G.; Shafigullin, M. N.; Borkman, R. F.; Whetten, R. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 10643.
14. (b) Schaaff, T. G.; Whetten, R. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 2630.
15. (a) Gautier, C.; Bürgi, T. J. Am Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11079.
16. (b) Tamura, M.; Fujihara, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15742.
17. (c) Yanagimoto, Y.; Negishi, Y.; Fujihara, H.; Tsukuda, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 11611.
18. (d) Shemer, G.; Krichevski, O.; Markovich, G.; Molotsky, T.; Lubitz, I.; Kotlyar, A. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11006.
19. Yao, H.; Miki, K.; Nishida, N.; Sasaki, A.; Kimura, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15536.
20. Nishida, N.; Yao, H.; Ueda, T.; Sasaki, A.; Kimura, K. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 2831.
21. Templeton, A. C.; Wuelfing, W. P.; Murray, R. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 1906.
22. (a) Hostetler, M. J.; Green, S. J.; Stokes, J. J.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4212.
23. (b) Song, Y.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7096.
24. (c) Song, Y.; Huang, T.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11694.
25. (d) Zhang, J.; Lakowicz, J. R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 8701.
26. Sasaki, A. Riguku J. 2005, 22, 31.
27. Silver nanoclusters to be fractioned strongly absorb UV light at 365 nm due to the metal-based electronic transitions, so the irradiated light cannot pass through the lanes (bands) of silver nanoclusters in the plate gel. On the other hand, the residual light can pass through the gel and excite a fluorescent screen. Then, the lanes containing silver nanoclusters make "shadows" on the screen.
28. 3) (Stiger, R. M.; Gorer, S.; Craft, B.; Penner, R. M. Langmuir 1999, 15, 790).
29. 2; this value can be estimated from the radius of a silver atom 0.144 nm), the cores of 1 and 2 contain ∼36 and ∼68 Ag atoms, of which ∼25 and ∼45 atoms lie on the nanocluster surface, respectively. Note that, for the estimation of the number of surface atoms, the skin is taken as the center of the outermost silver atoms (Terrill, R. H.; Postlethwaite, T. A.; Chen, C.-h.; Poon, C.-D.; Terzis, A.; Chen, A.; Hutchison, J. E.; Clark, M. R.; Wignall, G.; Londono, J. D.; Superfine, R.; Falvo, M.; Johnson, C. S., Jr.; Samulski, E. T.; Murray, R. W. J. Am Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 12537).
30. 2) (Mohtat, N.; Byloos, M.; Soucy, M.; Morin, S.; Morin, M. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2000, 484, 120; this packing density was calculated for the Ag(111) surface), 1 and 2 would have 9-10 and 16-17 thiol molecules on their surface, respectively.
31. Negishi, Y.; Nobusada, K.; Tsukuda, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5261.
32. (a) Sosa, I. O.; Noguez, C.; Barrera, R. G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 6269.
33. (b) Noguez, G Opt. Mater. 2005, 27, 1204.
34. Nobusada, K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 11904.
35. To further demonstrate the spectral differences, absorption spectra of the nanocluster compounds (ID/IL/WIDSO/ILSO) were normalized at around 255 nm and compared with each other. See the Supporting Information for more detail.
36. Kühnle, A.; Linderoth, T. R.; Hammer, B.; Besenbacher, F. Nature (London, U.K.) 2002, 415, 891.
37. eD. Unfortunately, clear images could not be obtained probably due to the very small size and high reactivity of the clusters under the electron-beam irradiation, but we confirmed that there was no size growth in these compounds.
38. Li, T.; Park, H. G.; Lee, H.-S.; Choi, S.-H. Nanotechnology 2004, 15, 660.
39. (a) Lee, H.; Kim, M. S.; Suh, S. W. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1991, 22, 91.
40. (b) In ref 21a, it was reported that cysteine-capped silver nanoparticles were decomposed to form gray precipitates under highly acidic conditions (pH < 3).
41. (c) Although this detail of the decomposition mechanism is not clear at present, it is probably due to a high chemical reactivity of small silver nanoclusters in the reaction with hydrochloric acid, which might produce silver chloride (Li, L.; Zhu, Y.-J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 303, 415.)
42. When the absorption of the supernatant solution was used for the calibration, we failed to obtain the relationship probably because the solution still contained the running buffer components and thus interfered with the appropriate estimation.
43. eL to be ∼48 or ∼59% ee, respectively.
44. Goldsmith, M.-R.; George, C. B.; Zuber, G.; Naaman, R.; Waldeck, D. H.; Wipf, P.; Beratan, D. N. Phys. Chem Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 63.
45. Yasui, T.; Hidaka, J.; Shimura, Y. Bull Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1966, 39, 2417.
46. Negishi, Y.; Takasugi, Y.; Sato, S.; Yao, H.; Kimura, K.; Tsukuda, T. J. Phys. Chem B 2006, 110, 12218.
47. Häkkinen, H.; Moseler, M.; Kostko, O.; Morgner, N.; Hoffmann, M. A.; Issendorff, B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 93401.
48. Kambe, K. Phys. Rev. 1955, 99, 419.
49. (a) Ulman, A. An Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films: From Langmuir Blodgett to Self-Assembly; Academic Press: New York, 1991.
50. (b) Pradeep, T.; Sandhyarani, N. Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74, 1593.
51. (c) Mohchev, B.; Petkov, P.; Petkova, T.; Popov, C. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 2005, 7, 1293.