메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 372-

The impact factor follies

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC IMPACT FACTOR; DECISION MAKING; EDITOR; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 42149094322     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31816b6a8c     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (13)

References (5)
  • 1
    • 23844465682 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Argument by analogy
    • Juthe A. Argument by analogy. Argumentation. 2005;19:1-27.
    • (2005) Argumentation , vol.19 , pp. 1-27
    • Juthe, A.1
  • 2
    • 42149113385 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Epidemiologists (of all people) should question journal impact factors
    • Hernán MA. Epidemiologists (of all people) should question journal impact factors. Epidemiology. 2008;19:366-368.
    • (2008) Epidemiology , vol.19 , pp. 366-368
    • Hernán, M.A.1
  • 3
    • 0031049280 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
    • Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ. 1997;314:498-502.
    • (1997) BMJ , vol.314 , pp. 498-502
    • Seglen, P.O.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.