Property-led development as a new approach in urban development? South Boston Waterfront in Boston as a case study;Property-led development als neuer Ansatz in der Stadtentwicklung? Das Beispiel der South Boston Waterfront in Boston

Erdkunde

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 41-57

  Heeg, Susanne ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Boston; Large scale redevelopment; Property led development; Real estate market; Urban entrepreneurialism

Indexed keywords

ENTREPRENEUR; REDEVELOPMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; URBAN PLANNING; WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT;

BOSTON; MASSACHUSETTS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 42049117561     PISSN: 00140015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3112/erdkunde.2008.01.04     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ADRIAN, H. (1998): Wer gestaltet die Stadt? In: SAUBERZWEIG, D. u. LAITENBERGER, W. (Hg.): Stadt der Zukunft - Zukunft der Stadt. Baden-Baden, 251-266.
2. BBR (Bundesamt für Bauweseri und Raumordnung) (2005): Neue Impulse für die Forschung. In: Informationen aus der Forschung des BBR 6, 1.
3. BIANCHINI, F.; DAWSON, J.; EVANS, R.; HEALEY, P.; DAVOUDI, S. u. O'TOOLE, M. (1992): Flagship projects in urban regeneration. In: HEALEY, P.; DAVOUDI, S.; O'TOOLE, M.; TAVSANOGLU, S. u. USHER, D. (Hg.): Rebuilding the city. London.
4. BMRB (Boston Municipal Research Bureau) (2005): Special Report 04-4. Boston.
5. BOYLE, M. u. HUGHES, G. (1994): The politics of urban entrepreneurialism in Glasgow. In: Geoforum 25, 453-470.
6. BRA (Boston Redevelopment Authority) (1999): The seaport public realm plan. Boston.
7. CASTELLS, M. (1977): The urban question: a marxist approach. London.
8. CASTELLS, M. (2001): Der Aufstieg der Netzwerkgesellschaft. Opladen.
9. CHAPMAN, J. u. FACER II, R. L. (2005): Connection between economic development and land taxation. In: Land Lines. Newsletter of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy 4, 6-8.
10. DE FRANTZ, M. (2005): From cultural regeneration to discursive governance: constructing the flagship of the 'Museumsquartier Vienna' as a plural symbol of change. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (1), 50-66.
11. DEAKING, N. u. EDWARDS, J. (1993): The enterprise culture and the inner city. London.
12. DESFOR, G. u. JORGENSEN, J. (2004): Flexible urban governance. The case of Copenhagen's recent waterfront development. In: European Planning Studies 12 (4), 479-496.
13. FAINSTEIN, S. (1990): Economics, politics, and development policy. In: LOGAN, J. R. u. SWANSTROM, T. (Hg.): Beyond the city limits. Philadelphia.
14. FAINSTEIN, S. (2001): The city builders. Property development in New York and London, 1980-2000. Oxford.
15. FLORIDA, R. (2005): Cities and the creative class. New York.
16. HAILA, A. (1991): Four types of investment in land and property. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 15 (3), 343-365.
17. HALL, T. u. HUBBARD, P. (1996): The entrepreneurial city: new urban politics, new urban geographies? In: Progress in Human Geography 20 (2), 153-174.
18. HARVEY, D. (1985): Urbanization of capital. Oxford.
19. HARVEY, D. (1989): From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. In: Geografiska Annaler B 71 (1), 3-18.
20. HÄUSSERMANN, H. u. BIRKLHUBER, D. (Hg.) (1993): Festivalisierung der Stadtpolitik: Stadtentwicklung durch große Projekte. Opladen
21. HEALEY, P.; DAVOUDI, S.; O'TOOLE, M.; TAVSANOGLU, S. u. USHER, D. (Hg.) (1992): Rebuilding the city: property-led urban regeneration. London.
22. HEEG, S. (2003): Städtische Flächenentwicklung vor dem Hintergrund von Veränderungen in der Immobilienwirtschaft. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung 5, 334-344.
23. HUBBARD, P. (1996): Urban design and city regeneration: social representations of entrepreneurial landscapes. In: Urban Studies 33 (8), 1441-1461.
24. JACOBS, K. (2004): Waterfront redevelopment: a critical discourse analysis of the policy-making process within the Chatham Maritime Project. In: Urban Studies 41 (4), 817-832.
25. JESSOP, B. (1997a): The entrepreneurial city. Re-imaging localities, redesigning economic governance, or restrucuring capital? In: JEWSON, N. u. MACGREGOR, S. (Hg.): Realising cities. London, 28-41.
26. JESSOP, B. (1997b): Die Zukunft des Nationalstaates - Erosion oder Reorganisation? Grundsätzliche Überlegungen zu Westeuropa. In: BECKER, S. u. SABLOWSKI, T. (Hg.): Jenseits der Nationalökonomie? Weltwirtschaft und Nationalstaat zwischen Globalisierung und Regionalisierung. Hamburg, 50-95.
27. KNOX, P. (1995): World cities and the organization of global space. In: JOHNSTON, R. J.; TAYLOR, P. J. u. WATTS, M. J. (Hg.): Geographies of global change. Remapping the world in the late twentieth Century. Cambridge, Oxford, 232-247.
28. LOWE, M. (2005): The regional shopping centre in the inner city: a study of retail-led urban regeneration. In: Urban Studies 42 (3), 449-470.
29. MACLARAN, A. u. MCGUIRK, P. (2003): Planning the city. In: MACLARAN, A. (Hg.): Making space. Property development and urban planning. London, 63-94.
30. MAYER, M. (1990): Lokale Politik in der unternehmerischen Stadt. In: BORST, R.; KRÄTKE, S.; MAYER, M.; ROTH, R. u. SCHMOLL, F. (Hg.): Das neue Gesicht der Städte. Theoretische Ansätze und empirische Befunde aus der internationalen Debatte. Basel, 190-208.
31. MCGUIRK, P. u. MACLARAN, A. (2001): Changing approaches to urban planning in an 'entrepreneurial city': the case of Dublin. In: European Planning Studies 9 (4), 437-457.
32. NEWMAN, P. u. THORNLEY, A. (1996): Urban planning in Europe. London.
33. PEREZ, Y.; AVAULT, J. u. VRABEL, J. (2003): Commercial land use in Boston. In: BRA (Hg.): Report 590. Boston.
34. RATCLIFFE, J. u. STUBBS, M. (1996): Urban planning and real estate development. The Natural and Built Environment Series 8. London.
35. SAND (Seaport Alliance for a Neighborhood Design) (2005a): www.bostonseaport.com/SAND/Archive/050128housing.html (September 2005).
36. SAND (Seaport Alliance for a Neighborhood Design) (2005b): Update. www.bostonseaport.com/SAND/Archive/050108fortpoint.html (April 2005).
37. SASSEN, S. (1996): Metropolen des Weltmarktes: Die neue Rolle der Global Cities. Frankfurt a.M., New York.
38. SOLESBURY, W. (1990): Property development and urban regeneration. In: HEALEY, P. u. NABARRO, R. (Hg.): Land and property-development. Aldershot, 186-195.
39. STONE, C. N. (1993): Urban regimes and the capacity to govern. In: Journal of urban affairs 15 (1), 1-28.
40. SWYNGEDOUW, E. (1992): The mammon quest: 'glocalisation', interspatial competition and the monetary order: the construction of new scales. In: DUNFORD, M. u. KAFKALAS, G. (Hg.): Cities and regions in the New Europe. The global-local interplay arid spatial development strategies. London.
41. SWYNGEDOUW, E.; MOULEART, F. u. RODRIGUEZ, A. (2002): Neoliberal urbanization in Europe. In: BRENNER, N. u. THEODORE, N. (Hg.): Spaces of neoliberalism. Malden, 195-229.
42. TAYLOR, P. (2004): World city network: a global urban analysis. London.
43. TUROK, I. (1992): Property-led regeneration: panacea or placebo? In: Environment and Planning A 24, 361-379.
44. WEBER, R. (2002): Extracting value from the city: neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. In: BRENNER, N. u. THEODORE, N. (Hg.): Spaces of neoliberalism. Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Malden, 172-193.
45. ZUKIN, S. (1993): Landscapes of power : from Detroit to Disney World. Berkeley.