Evaluation of sampling designs for red sea urchins Strongylocentrotus franciscanus in British Columbia

North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 219-230

  Skibo, Karen M ^a,b   Schwarz, Carl J ^a   Peterman, Randall M ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b BC HYDRO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR; BIOMASS; DESIGN; ECHINODERM; POPULATION DENSITY; SAMPLING; TRANSECT;

BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

ECHINOIDEA; INVERTEBRATA; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS; STRONGYLOCENTROTUS FRANCISCANUS;

EID: 42049114430     PISSN: 02755947     EISSN: 15488675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/M06-293.1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brown, J. A., and B. F. J. Manly. 1998. Restricted adaptive cluster sampling. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 5:49-63.
2. Cabrai, H. N., and A. G. Murta. 2004. Effect of sampling design on abundance estimates of benthic invertebrates in environmental monitoring studies. Marine Ecology Progress Series 276:19-24.
3. Campbell, A., W. Hajas, and D. Bureau. 1999. Quota options for the red sea urchin fishery in British Columbia for fishing season 2000-2001. Canadian Stock Assessment Secretariat, Research Document 99/201, Ottawa.
4. Campbell, A., D. Tzotzos, W. C. Hajas, and L. L. Barton. 2001. Quota options for the red sea urchin fishery in British Columbia for fishing season 2002-2003. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, Research Document 2001/141, Ottawa.
5. Christman, M. C. 1997. Efficiency of some sampling designs for spatially clustered populations. Environmetrics 8:145-166.
6. Cochran, W. G. 1977. Sampling techniques, 3rd edition. Wiley, New York.
7. Conners, M. E., and S. J. Schwager. 2002. The use of adaptive cluster sampling for hydroacoustic surveys. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59:1314-1325.
8. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2005. Fisheries development program: new and emerging fisheries. Available: www-comm.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/publications/ fishdev_e.htm. (July 2005).
9. Hanselman, D. H., T. J. Quinn, C. Lunsford, J. Heifetz, and D. Clausen. 2003. Applications in adaptive cluster sampling of Gulf of Alaska rockfish. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 101:501-513.
10. Jamieson, G. S., and C. J. Schwarz. 1998. Survey protocol considerations for 1995 red sea urchin surveys. Pages 69-81 in B. J. Waddell, G. E. Gillespie, and L. C. Walthers, editors. Invertebrate working papers reviewed by the Pacific Stock Assessment Review Committee (PSARC) in 1995, part 2. Echinoderms. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2215.
11. Lo, N. C. H., D. Griffith, and J. R. Hunter. 1997. Using a restricted adaptive cluster sampling to estimate Pacific hake larval abundance. California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations Reports 38:103-113.
12. Neyman, J. 1934. On the two different aspects of the representative methods: the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 97:558-625.
13. Perry, R. I., C. J. Walters, and J. A. Boutillier. 1999. A framework for providing scientific advice for the management of new and developing invertebrate fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 9:125-150.
14. Salehi, M. M., and G. A. F. Seber. 2002. Unbiased estimators for restricted adaptive cluster sampling. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 44:63-74.
15. Skibo, K. M. 2005. Development of sampling regimes for estimating density of red sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus). Master's thesis. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia. Available: ir.lib.sfu.ca/retrieve/2458/etd2061.pdf. (January 2008).
16. Smith, D. R., M. J. Conroy, and D. H. Brakhage. 1995. Efficiency of adaptive cluster sampling for estimating density of wintering waterfowl. Biometrics 51:777-788.
17. Smith, D. R., R. F. Villella, and D. P. Lemarie. 2003. Application of adaptive cluster sampling to low-density populations of freshwater mussels. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 10:7-15.
18. Su, Z., and T. J. Quinn II. 2003. Estimator bias and efficiency for adaptive cluster sampling with order statistics and a stopping rule. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 10:17-41.
19. Thompson, S. K. 1990. Adaptive cluster sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85:1050-1059.
20. Thompson, S. K. 1991. Adaptive cluster sampling: designs with primary and secondary units. Biometrics 47:1103-1115.
21. Thompson, S. K., and G. A. F. Seber. 1996. Adaptive sampling. Wiley, New York.
22. Tzotzos, D., A. Campbell, and T. Norgard. 2003. Survey of red sea urchin populations in Laredo Channel, British Columbia, 2000. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2629.
23. Woodby, D. 1998. Adaptive cluster sampling: efficiency, fixed sample sizes, and an application to red sea urchins Strongylocentrotus franciscanus in Southeast Alaska. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 125:15-20.