Japanese cancer patient participation in and satisfaction with treatment-related decision-making: A qualitative study

BMC Public Health

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Watanabe, Yoshiko ^a   Takahashi, Miyako ^a   Kai, Ichiro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; JAPAN; LOFLAND AND LOFLAND; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; TOKYO;

EID: 42049093167     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-77     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back. A Coulter, BMJ 1999 319 7212 719 720 10487980
2. Physicians in health-care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information. RB Deber, CMAJ 1994 151 2 171 176 8039062
3. Informed consent: the whole truth for patients. J Lantos, Cancer 1993 72 9 2811 2815 10.1002/1097-0142(19931101)72:9+<2811::AID-CNCR2820721507〉3. 0.CO;2-G 8402509
4. Patient perception of involvement in medical care: relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. DS Brody SM Miller CE Lerman DG Smith GC Caputo, J Gen Intern Med 1989 4 6 506 511 10.1007/BF02599549 2585158
5. Patients choices and perceptions after an invitation to participate in treatment decisions. SL England J Evans, Soc Sci Med 1992 34 11 1217 1225 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90314-G 1641682
6. Expanding patient involvement in care: effects on patient outcomes. S Greenfield S Kaplan JE Ware, Ann Intern Med 1985 102 4 520 528 3977198
7. Shared treatment decision making: what does it mean to physicians? CA Charles T Whelan A Gafni A Willan S Farrell, J Clin Oncol 2003 21 5 932 936 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.057 12610196
8. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. C Charles A Gafni T Whelan, Soc Sci Med 1999 49 5 651 661 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00145-8 10452420
9. Decision-making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play. LF Degner JA Sloan, J Clin Epidemiol 1992 45 9 941 950 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9 1432023
10. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? RB Deber N Kraetschmer J Irvine, Arch Intern Med 1996 156 13 1414 1420 10.1001/archinte.156.13.1414 8678709
11. Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? NK Arora CA McHorney, Med Care 2000 38 3 335 341 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00010 10718358
12. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients' desired level of involvement? NL Keating E Guadagnoli MB Landrum C Borbas JC Weeks, J Clin Oncol 2002 20 6 1473 1479 10.1200/JCO.20.6.1473 11896094
13. Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. NK Janz PA Wren LA Copeland JC Lowery SL Goldfarb EG Wilkins, J Clin Oncol 2004 22 15 3091 3098 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.069 15284259
14. Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. PM Lantz NK Janz A Fagerlin K Schwartz LH Liu I Lakhani B Salem SJ Katz, Health Serv Res 2005 40 3 745 767 15960689 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00383.x
15. Not all patients want to participate in decision making: a national study of public preferences. W Levinson A Kao A Kuby RA Thisted, J Gen Intern Med 2005 20 6 531 535 15987329 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x
16. Patient autonomy preferences among hypertensive outpatients in a primary care setting in Japan. K Nomura M Ohno Y Fujinuma H Ishikawa, Intern Med 2007 46 17 1403 1408 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.0141 17827839
17. End-of-life decisions and advance directives in palliative care: a cross-cultural survey of patients and health-care professionals. R Voltz A Akabayashi C Reese G Ohi HM Sass, J Pain Symptom Manage 1998 16 3 153 162 10.1016/S0885-3924(98)00067-0 9769617
18. Decision-making models in Japanese psychiatry: transitions from passive to active patterns. BT Slingsby, Soc Sci Med 2004 59 1 83 91 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.006 15087145
19. The cautious acceptance of informed consent in Japan. RB Leflar, Med Law 1997 16 705 720 9573708
20. Respecting autonomy in difficult medical settings: a questionnaire study in Japan. M Hayashi C Hasui F Kitamura M Murakami M Takeuchi H Katoh T Kitamura, Ethics Behav 2000 10 1 51 63 10.1207/S15327019EB1001_4 11657908
21. Ishi no shokugyou rinri sisin [Professional ethics guideline for physicians]. JMA(Japan Medical Association), Nippon Ishikai Zasshi 2004 131 Suppl 7 1 46
22. Informed consent revisited: Japan and the US. A Akabayashi BT Slingsby, Am J Bioeth 2006 6 1 9 14 10.1080/15265160500394549 16423775
23. Patients' preferences for involvement in treatment decision making in Japan. M Sekimoto A Asai M Ohnishi E Nishigaki T Fukui T Shimbo Y Imanaka, BMC Fam Pract 2004 5 1 1 15053839 10.1186/1471-2296-5-1
24. Trends in Leading Causes of Death, Summary of Vital Statistics. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/ db-hw/populate/pop1-t1.html
25. Nihon ni okeru gan syougai risuku hyouka [Estimate of lifetime prevalence of cancer among Japanese]. K Kamo S Kaneko K Yoshimura T Sobue, Journal of Health and Welfare Statistics 2005 52 6 21 26
26. Truth-telling practice in cancer care in Japan. Y Uchitomi S Yamawaki, Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997 809 1 290 299 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48092.x 9103580
27. Cancer disclosure in Japan: historical comparisons, current practices. TS Elwyn MD Fetters DW Gorenflo T Tsuda, Soc Sci Med 1998 46 9 1151 1163 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)10042-9 9572605
28. Changes in disclosure of information to cancer patients in a general hospital in Japan. N Horikawa T Yamazaki M Sagawa T Nagata, Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000 22 1 37 42 10.1016/S0163-8343(99)00042-0 10715502
29. Communication and awareness about dying in the 1990s. D Field G Copp, Palliat Med 1999 13 6 459 468 10715752 10715752 10.1191/026921699668763479
30. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. J Lofland LH Lofland, Belmont, Wadsworth 1995
31. Naturalistic Inquiry. Y Lincoln E Guba, Beverly Hills CA, Sage 1985
32. Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: a comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States. GW Ruhnke SR Wilson T Akamatsu T Kinoue Y Takashima MK Goldstein BA Koenig JC Hornberger TA Raffin, Chest 2000 118 4 1172 1182 10.1378/chest.118.4.1172 11035693
33. Women and health in Japan: Sexuality after breast cancer. M Takahashi, Comparing Social Policies: Exploring New Perspectives in Britain and Japan The Policy Press, Izuhara M Bristol, 2003 227 243
34. The influence of locus of control on preferences for information and decision making. H Hashimoto S Fukuhara, Patient Educ Couns 2004 55 2 236 240 10.1016/j.pec.2003.09.010 15530760
35. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. E Bruera C Sweeney K Calder L Palmer S Benisch-Tolley, J Clin Oncol 2001 19 11 2883 2885 11387361
36. The benefit of patient participation in clinical practice guidelines [in Japanese]. M Takahashi R Sato-Sakuma T Nakayama, Clinical Practice 2006 25 11 1042 1046