Supervision in occupational therapy: How are we doing?

British Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 119-121

  Gaitskell, Sue ^a   Morley, Mary ^b  

^a SOUTH LONDON AND MAUDSLEY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b SPRINGFIELD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Management; Practice development; Supervision

Indexed keywords

EID: 42049092739     PISSN: 03080226     EISSN: 14776006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/030802260807100310     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Clothier C, et al (1994) The Allitt inquiry. London: HMSO.
2. College of Occupational Therapists (1990) Standards, Policies and Proceedings: Statement on supervision in occupational therapy SPP 150. London: COT.
3. College of Occupational Therapists (1997) Statement on supervision in occupational therapy SPP 150(A). London: COT.
4. College of Occupational Therapists (2005) College of Occupational Therapists: Code of ethics and professional conduct. London: COT.
5. College of Occupational Therapists (2006) Management briefing: supervision. London: COT.
6. Department of Health (1993) A vision for the future: the nursing, midwifery and health visiting contribution to health and health care. London: DH.
7. Department of Health (1998) A first class service: quality in the new NHS. London: DH.
8. Department of Health (2000) A quality strategy for social care. London: DH.
9. Department of Health (2004) The knowledge and skills framework and the development review process. Final version. London: DH.
10. Great Britain Parliament (2002) Health Professions Order 2001. Statutory Instrument 2002 No. 254. London: Stationery Office.
11. Hawkins P, Shohet R (1989) Supervision in the helping professions. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
12. Health Professions Council (2005) Continuing professional development - key decisions. London: HPC.
13. Hunter EP, Blair SEE (1999) Staff supervision for occupational therapists. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(8), 344-50.
14. Ilott I (1996) Ranking the problems of fieldwork supervision reveals a new problem: failing students. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 59(11), 525-28.
15. Johns C (1994) Guided reflection. In: A Palmer, S Burns, C Bulman, eds. Reflective practice in nursing: the growth of the professional practitioner. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 110-30.
16. Kennedy I (2001) Bristol Royal Infirmary Public Inquiry: Report. Learning from Bristol: the report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. Command Paper: CM5207. London: Stationery Office.
17. Laming, Lord (2003) The Victoria Climbie Inquiry. Report of an inquiry by Lord Laming. Norwich: HMSO.
18. Morley M (2007) Developing a preceptorship programme for newly qualified occupational therapists: action research. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 70(8), 330-38.
19. Nicklin P (1995) Super supervision. Nursing Management, 2(5), 24.
20. Proctor B (1987) Supervision: a co-operative exercise in accountability. In: M Marken, M Payne, eds. Enabling and ensuring: supervision in practice. Leicester: National Youth Bureau.
21. Sweeney G, Webley P, Treacher A (2001a) Supervision in occupational therapy, part 1: the supervisor's anxieties. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(7), 337-45.
22. Sweeney G, Webley P, Treacher A (2001b) Supervision in occupational therapy, part 2: the supervisee's dilemma. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 64(8), 380-86.
23. Sweeney G, Webley P, Treacher A (2001c) Supervision in occupational therapy, part 3: accommodating the supervisor and the supervisee. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(9), 426-31.
24. Van Ooijen E (2000) Clinical supervision: a practical guide. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
25. Van Ooijen E (2003) Clinical supervision made easy. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
26. Wolsey P, Leach R (1997) Clinical supervision: a hornet's nest. Nursing Times, 93(44), 24-27.