Applying zonation methods and Tabu search to improve the ground-water modeling

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 107-120

  Tan, Chung Che ^a   Tung, Ching Pin ^a   Tsai, Frank T C ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ground water modeling; Heuristic algorithms; Inverse analysis; Optimization; Parameterization; Zonation

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; TABU SEARCH;

GROUND-WATER MODELING; INVERSE ANALYSIS; ZONATION;

WATER MANAGEMENT;

ERROR ANALYSIS; HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; TABU SEARCH; WATER MANAGEMENT;

GROUNDWATER; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERIZATION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; ZONATION;

EID: 42049091887     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00141.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alcolea, A., J. Carrera A. Medina, 2006. Inversion of Heterogeneous Parabolic-Type Equations Using the Pilot Points Method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 51 : 963 980.
2. Chiang, W-H. W. Kinzelbach, 2003. 3D-Groundwater Modeling With PMWIN: A Simulation System for Modeling Groundwater Flow and Pollution (1st Edition 2001. Corr. 3rd printing, XIV). Springer, New York, New York, 346 pp.
3. Dirchlet, G.L., 1850. Uber die Reduction der Positeven Quadratischen Formen mit Drei Unbestimmten Ganzen Zahlen. Journal of fur die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik 40 : 209 227.
4. Glover, F., 1993. A User's Guide to Tabu Search. Annals of Operations Research 41 : 3 28.
5. Glover, F. M. Laguna, 1997. Tabu Search. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts.
6. Hill, M.C., R.L. Colley D.W. Pollock, 1998. A Controlled Experiment in Ground Water Flow Model Calibration. Ground Water 36 : 520 535.
7. Lin, Y.P., Y.C. Tan S. Rouhani, 2001. Identifying Spatial Characteristics of Transmissivity Using Simulated Annealing and Kriging Methods. Environmental Geology 41 : 200 208.
8. Mcdonald, M.G. A.W. Harbaugh, 1988. A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model. Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, 06-A1. U.S. Geological Survey.
9. McLaughlin, D. L.R. Townley, 1996. A Reassessment of the Groundwater Inverse Problem. Water Resources Research 32 (5 1131 1161.
10. Morshed, J. J.J. Kaluarachchi, 1998. Parameter Estimation Using Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm for Free-Product Migration and Recovery. Water Resources Research 34 (5 1101 1113.
11. Okabe, A., B. Boots K. Sugihara, 1992. Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams (1st Edition). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom.
12. RamaRao, B.S., A.M. LaVenue, G. de Marsily M.G. Marietta, 1995. Pilot Point Methodology for Automated Calibration of an Ensemble of Conditionally Simulated Transmissivity Fields 1. Theory and Computational Experiments. Water Resources Research 31 (3 475 593.
13. Schürmann, J., 1996. Pattern Classification: A Unified View of Statistical and Neural Approaches, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey.
14. Sun, N-Z., 1994. Inverse Problems in Groundwater Modeling. Theory and Applications of Transport in Porous Media; v. 6. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Boston, Massachusetts, xiii, 337 pp.
15. Thiessen, A.H., 1911. Precipitation Averages for Large Areas. Monthly Weather Review 39 : 1082 1084.
16. Tsai, F.T.-C., 2004. Aquifer Characterization and Parameter Heterogeneity Estimation With a Coupled Zonation-Geostatistical Method and Natural Neighbors. Proceeding of the 2004 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress.
17. Tsai, F.T.-C., N.-Z. Sun W.W.-G. Yeh, 2003a. Global-Local Optimization for Parameter Structure Identification in Three-Dimensional Groundwater Modeling. Water Resources Research 39 (2 1043 1056.
18. Tsai, F.T.-C., N.-Z. Sun W.W.-G. Yeh, 2003b. A Combinatorial Optimization Scheme for Parameter Structure Identification in Ground Water Modeling. Ground Water 41 (2 156 169.
19. Tsai, F.T.-C. W.W.-G. Yeh, 2004. Characterization and Identification of Aquifer Heterogeneity With Generalized Parameterization and Bayesian Estimation. Water Resources Research 40 : W10102, doi:.
20. Tung, C.P. C.A. Chou, 2002. Application of Tabu Search to Groundwater Parameter Zonation. Journal of American Water Resources Association 38 (4 1115 1126.
21. Tung, C.P. C.A. Chou, 2004. Pattern Classification Using Tabu Search to Identify the Spatial Distribution of Groundwater Pumping. Hydrogeology Journal 12 : 488 496.
22. Tung, C.P. C.C. Tan, 2005. An Optimal Procedure for Identifying Parameter Structure and Application to a Confined Aquifer. Environmental Geology 47 : 1062 1071.
23. Tung, C.P., C.C. Tan Y.P. Lin, 2003. Improving Groundwater Flow Modeling Using Optimal Zoning Methods. Environmental Geology 44 : 627 638.
24. Voronoi, G., 1908. Nouvelles Applications des Parameters Continues a la Theorie des Formes Quadratiques. Deuxieme Memoire: Recherches sur les Parallelloedres Primitives. Journal fur die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik 134 : 198 287.
25. Yeh, W.W.-G. Y.S. Yoon, 1981. Aquifer Parameter Identification With Optimum Dimension in Parameterization. Water Resources Research 17 (3 664 672.
26. Yeh, W.W.-G., Y.S. Yoon K.S. Lee, 1983. Aquifer Parameter Identification With Kriging and Optimum Parameterization. Water Resources Research 19 (1 225 233.
27. Zheng, C. P. Wang, 1996. Parameter Structure Identification Using Tabu Search and Simulated Annealing. Advances in Water Resources 19 (4 215 224.