Improving groundwater-flow modeling using optimal zoning methods

Environmental Geology

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 627-638

  Tung, Ching Pin ^a   Tang, Chung Che ^a   Lin, Yu Pin ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHINESE CULTURE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Hydraulic conductivity; Hydraulic head; Optimization; Shortest distance method; Simulated annealing algorithms

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GROUNDWATER; HYDRAULICS; ZONING;

GROUNDWATER-FLOW MODELING;

GEOLOGY;

GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULIC HEAD; HYDROGEOLOGY; MODELING; OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 0141565073     PISSN: 09430105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00254-003-0822-1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abdulla FA, Al-Khatib MA, Al-Ghazzawi ZD (2000) Development of groundwater modeling for the AZROQ basin. Environ Geol 40(1/2):11-18
2. Detwiler RL, Mehl S, Rajaram H, Cheung WW (2002) Comparison of an algebraic multigrid algorithm to two iterative solvers used for modeling ground water flow and transport. Ground Water 40(3):267-272
3. Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1992) Geostatistical software library and user's guide. Oxford University Press, New York
4. Dougherty DE, Marryott RA (1991) Optimal groundwater management: 1. simulated annealing. Water Resour Res 27(10):2493-2508
5. Ella VB, Melvin SW, Kanwar RS, Jones LC, Horton R (2002) Inverse three-dimensional groundwater modeling using the finite-difference method for recharge estimation in a glacial till aquitard. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 45(3):703-71
6. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1990) Finding groups in data. Wiley, New York
7. Kirkpatrick S (1984) Optimization by simulated annealing: quantitative studies. J Statistic Phys 34(5/6):975-986
8. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671-680
9. Lin YP, Chang TK, Teng TP (2001a) Characterization soil lead by comparing of sequential Gaussian simulation, simulated annealing simulation and kriging methods. Environ Geol 41(1/2):189-199
10. Lin YP, Tan YC, Rouhani S (2001b) Identifying spatial characteristics of transmissivity using simulated annealing and kriging methods. Environ Geol 41:200-208
11. Majumdar PK, Ghosh NC, Chakravorty B (2002) Analysis of arsenic-contaminated groundwater domain in the Nadia district of West Bengal (India). Hydrol Sci, J Sci Hydrol 47:S55-S66
12. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, 06-A1. US Geological Survey
13. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth A, Rosenbluth M, Teller A, Teller E, Chem J (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computation machines. Physics 21:1087-1092
14. Mikake S, Yoshida H, Koide K, Yanagizawa K, Ogata N, Maekawa K (2000) Methodology development for modeling heterogeneous conductivity fields for a sandstone type uranium deposit, central Japan. Eng Geol 56:185-195
15. Roth C, Chiles JP, De Fouquet C (1998) Combing geostatistics and flow simulators to identify transmissivity. Adv Water Resour 21(7):555-565
16. Sophocleous MA, Koelliker JK, Govindaraju RS, Birdie T, Ramireddygari SR, Perkins SP (1999) Integrated numerical modeling for basin-wide water management: the case of the Rattlesnake Creek basin in south-central Kansas. J Hydrol 214:179-196
17. Tung CP, Chou CA (2002) Application of tabu search to groundwater parameter zonation. J Am Water Resour Assoc 38(4):1115-1126
18. Wang PP, Zheng C (1998) An efficient approach for successively perturbed groundwater models. Adv Water Resour 21:499-508
19. Wen XH, Capilla JE, Deutsch CV, Gomez-Hernandez JJ, Cullick AS (1999) A program to create permeability fields that honor single-phase flow rate and pressure data. Comput Geosci 25:217-230
20. Wingle WL, Poeter EP, McKenna SA (1999) UNCERT: geostatistics, uncertainty analysis and visualization software applied to groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling. Comput Geosci 25:365-376