Comparison of radiographic measurements obtained with conventional and indirect digital imaging during endodontic treatment

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 167-170

  Schmitd, Ligia Buloto ^a   Lima, Tatiana De Castro ^a   Chinellato, Luiz Eduardo Montenegro ^a,b   Bramante, Clóvis Monteiro ^a   Garcia, Roberto Brandão ^a   De Moraes, Ivaldo Gomes ^a   Bernardineli, Norberti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Lameda Octavio Pinheiro Brisolla   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Digora; Photostimulated phosphor plate system; Radiography

Indexed keywords

EID: 42049088037     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572008000200016     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Borg E, Attaelmanan A, Grondahl HG. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000;29:70-5.
2. Cederberg RA, Tydwell E, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW. Endodontic working length assessment: comparinson of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:325-8.
3. Conover GL, Hildebolt CF, Yokoyama-Crothers N. Comparison of linear measurements made from storage phosphor and dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol.1996;25:268-73.
4. Emmott LF. The digital revolution, images and X-rays. N Y State Dent J. 2005;71:40-2.
5. Garcia AA, Navarro LF, Castelló VU, Laliga RM. Evaluation of a digital radiography to estimate working length. J Endod. 1997;23:363-5.
6. Huda W, Rill LN, Benn DK, Pettigrew JC. Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83:725-31.
7. Kaeppler G, Vogel A, Axmann-Krcmar D. Intra-oral storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the assessment of alveolar bone structures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000;29:362-7.
8. Lavelle CLB, Wu CJ. Digital radiographic images will benefit endodontic services. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1995;11:253-60.
9. Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Potter BJ. Measurement of endodontic file lengths: calibrated versus uncalibrated digital images. J Endod. 2001;27:779-81.
10. Miles DA. The deal on digital: the status of radiographic imaging. Compendium. 2001;22:1057-64.
11. Nair KM, Nair UP. Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics: a review. J Endod. 2007;33:1-6.
12. Parissis N, Kondylidou-Sidira A, Tsirlis A, Patias P. Conventional radiographs vs digitized radiographs: image quality assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34:353-6.
13. Sanderink GCH, Huiskens R, Van der Stelt PF, Welander US, Stheeman E. Image quality of direct intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length: the Radio VisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent Systems compared with Ektaspeed films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;78:125-32.
14. Shearer AC, Mullane E, Macfarlane TV, Grondahl HG, Horner K. Three phosphor plate systems and film compared for imaging root canals. Int Endod J. 2001;34:275-9.
15. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, Lobach SR, van der Stelt PF Reduction in size of digital images: does it lead to less detectability or less of diagnostic information? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998;27:93-6.
16. Westphalen VPD, Moraes IG, Westphalen FH, Martins WD, Couto Souza PH. Conventional and digital radiographic methods in the detection of simulated external root resorptions: a comparative study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:233-5.