Risk identification, assessment, and management for the 2006 Virginia gubernatorial inauguration

Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, SIEDS'06

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 130-135

  Capetanakis, Anna ^a   Dickey, Brett D ^a   Harmer, Courtney A ^a   Orsi, Mark J ^a   Stewart, Doug D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RISK ANALYSIS; RISK MANAGEMENT; SECURITY SYSTEMS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

NATIONAL SECURITY; NATURAL DISASTERS; RISK IDENTIFICATION; TERRORIST ATTACKS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 41949107912     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SIEDS.2006.278726     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Apostolakis, O. & D.Lemon. (2005) A screening methodology for the identification and ranking of infrastructure vulnerabilities due to terrorism. Risk Analysis 25(2). 361-376.
2. Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems. (2005) Adaptive Two-Player Hierarchical Holographic Modeling (ATP-HHM). University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
3. David, R. (2002). Homeland Security: Building a National Strategy. National Academy of Engineering. Retrieved April 3, 2006 from the World Wide Web: http://www.nae.edu/nae/bridgecom.nsf/weblinks/CGOZ-58NLJY?OpenDocument.
4. Haimes, Y. (2005). Deployment of the Adaptive Multiplayer HHM Game for the 2006 Virginia Gubernatorial Inauguration. SEAS Proposal No. SE-VTRC-2683-06.
5. Haimes, Y. & B. Horowitz. (2004a). Adaptive two-player hierarchical holographic modeling game for counterterrorism intelligence analysis. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 1(3).
6. Haimes, Y. & B. Horowitz. (2004b). Modeling interdependent infrastructures for sustainable counterterrorism. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 33-42.
7. Haimes, Y. (1998). Risk Modeling. Assessment, and Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
8. Horowitz, B. & Y. Haimes. (2003). Risk-based methodology for scenario tracking, intelligence gathering, and analysis for countering terrorism. Systems Engineering 6(3). 152-169.
9. Howe, D. (2004). Homeland Security Council: Planning Scenarios. Retrieved April 3, 2006 from the World Wide Web: http://www.voiceoffreedom.com/ archives/homelandsecurity/15-attacks_the_hawiaa_disclosure.htm.
10. Lambert, J., Y. Haimes, D. Li, R. Schooff, & V. Tulsiani. (2001). Identification, ranking, and management of risks in a major system acquisition. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 72(3). 315-325.
11. Lamm, G. & Y. Haimes. (2002). Assessing and managing risks to information assurance: a methodological approach. Systems Engineering 5(4). 286-314.
12. Leung, M., J. Lambert, & A. Mosenthal. (2004) A risk-based approach to setting priorities in protecting bridges against terrorist attacks. (2004). Risk Analysis 24(4). 963-984.
13. Major, J. Advanced Techniques for Modeling Terrorism Risk. National Bureau of Economic Research Insurance Group Conference. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from the World Wide Web: http://www.guycarp.com/pdf/ major_terrorism.pdf
14. NRC (National Research Council). (2002). Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
15. Oster, C. (2002, April 8). Can the risk of terrorism be calculated by insurers? game theory might do it. Wallstreet Journal Online. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from the World Wide Web: www.gametheory.net/news/Items/011.html
16. Santos, J. & Y. Haimes. (2004). Modeling the demand reduction input-output (I-O) inoperability due to terrorism of interconnected infrastructures. Risk Analysis 24(6). 1437-1451.