Risk-based methodology for scenario tracking, intelligence gathering, and analysis for countering terrorism

Systems Engineering

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 152-169

  Horowitz, Barry M ^a   Haimes, Yacov Y ^a  

^a University of Virginia   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Hierarchical holographic modeling; Multiobjective decision trees; Risk analysis; Scenario tracking; Terrorism

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; HIERARCHICAL HOLOGRAPHIC MODELING; MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION TREES; RISK ANALYSIS; SCENARIO TRACKING; TERRORISM;

HOLOGRAPHY; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLANNING; PROCESS ENGINEERING; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISKS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0242621136     PISSN: 10981241     EISSN: 15206858     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sys.10043     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. G. Altshuller, Creativity as an exact science, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1988.
2. G. Altshuller, And suddenly the inventor appeared, TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving, Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MA, 1994.
3. E. Asbeck and Y.Y. Haimes, The partitioned multiobjective risk method, Large Scale Syst 6 (1984), 13-8.
4. R.G. Bace, Intrusion detection, Macmillan Technical Publishing, New York, 2000, pp. 79-117.
5. J. Baron, J.C. Hershey, and H. Kunreuther, Determinants of priority for risk reduction: The role of worry, Risk Anal 20(4) (2000), 413-427.
6. V. Chankong and Y.Y. Haimes, Multiobjective decision making: theory and methodology, Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.
7. V. Chankong, Y.Y. Haimes, H.S. Rosenkranz, and J. Pet-Edwards, The carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) method: A Bayesian approach, Mutation Res 153(1985), 135-166.
8. R. Cunningham and C. Stevenson, Accurately detecting source code of attacks that increase privilege, RAID 2001, LNCS 2212, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001, pp. 104-116.
9. H. Debar and A. Wespi, Aggregation and correlation of intrusion-detection alerts, RAID 2001, LNCS 2212, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001, pp. 85-103.
10. M. Dombroski, Y.Y. Haimes, J.H. Lambert, K. Schlussel, and M. Sulcoski, Risk-based methodology for support of operations other than war, Mil Oper Res 7(1) (2002), 19-38.
11. H.I. Frolwein, Y.Y. Haimes, and J.H. Lambert, Risk of extreme events in multiobjective decision trees, Part 2. Rare events, Risk Anal 20(1) (2000), 125-134.
12. W.J.J. Gordon, Synectics, the development of creative capacity, Macmillan, New York, 1968.
13. Y.Y. Haimes, Hierarchical holographic modeling, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 11(9) (1981), 606-617.
14. Y.Y. Haimes, Risk modeling assessment, and management, Wiley, New York, 1998.
15. Y.Y. Haimes and D. Macko, Hierarchical structures in water resources systems management, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet SMC-3(4) (1973), 396-402.
16. Y.Y. Haimes, P.O. Karlsson, J.M. Mitsiopoulos, and D. Li, "Risk management of extreme events," Supplement I. Systems and control encyclopedia: Theory, technology, applications, M. Singh (Editor), Pergamon, New York, 1990a, pp. 259-265.
17. Y.Y. Haimes, K. Tarvainen, T. Shima, and J. Thadathil, Hierarchical multiobjective analysis of large-scale systems, Hemisphere, New York, 1990b.
18. Y.Y. Haimes, D. Li, and V. Tulsiani, Multiobjective decision tree method, Risk Anal 10(1) (1990c), 111-129.
19. Y.Y. Haimes, N.C. Matalas, J.H. Lambert, B.A. Jackson, and J.F.R. Fellows, Reducing the vulnerability of water supply systems to attack, J Infrastruct Syst 4(4) (1998), 164-177.
20. Y.Y. Haimes, S. Kaplan, and J.H. Lambert, Risk filtering, ranking and management framework using hierarchical holographic modeling, Risk Anal 22(2) (2002), 383-397.
21. A.D. Hall, III, A methodology for systems engineering, D. Van Nostrand, New York, 1962.
22. A.D. Hall, III, Metasystems methodology: A new synthesis and unification, Pergamon, New York, 1989, p. 6.
23. A. Josang, Subjective evidential reasoning, Proc 9th Int Conf Inf Process Manage Uncertainty Knowledge-Based Syst (IPMU 2002), Annecy, France, July 1-5, 2002.
24. S. Kaplan, On inclusion of precursor and near miss events in quantitative risk assessments: A Bayesian point of view and a space shuttle example, J Reliab Eng Syst Safety 27 (1990), 103-115.
25. S. Kaplan, "Expert information" vs. "expert opinion;" another approach to the problem of eliciting/combining/using expert knowledge in PRA, J Reliab Eng Syst Safety 35 (1992), 61-72.
26. S. Kaplan, An introduction to TRIZ: The Russian theory of inventive problem solving, Ideation International, Southfield, MI, 1996.
27. S. Kaplan and BJ. Garrick, On the quantitative definition of risk, Risk Anal 1(1) (1981), 11-27.
28. S. Kaplan, S. Vishnepolschi, B. Zlotin, and A. Zusman, New tool for failure and risk analysis, anticipatory failure determination (AFD) and the theory of scenario structuring, Ideation International, Southfield, MI, 1999.
29. S. Kaplan, Y.Y. Haimes, and B.J. Garrick, Fitting hierarchical holographic modeling (HHM) into the theory of scenario structuring and a refinement to the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 21(5) (2001), 807-819.
30. A. Kott, M. Pollack, and B. Krogh, The situation assessment problem: Toward a research agenda, AEC Proc DARPA-JFACC Symp Adv Enterprise Control, San Diego, November 15-16, 1999, pp. 251-258.
31. J.H. Lambert, Y.Y. Haimes, D. Li, R. Schooff, and V. Tulsiani, Identification, ranking, and management of risks in a major system acquisition, Reliab Eng Syst Safety 72(3) (2001), 315-325.
32. W.W. Lowrance, Of acceptable risk, William Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, 1976.
33. D. Macko, and Y.Y. Haimes, Overlapping coordination of hierarchical structures, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet SMC-8(10) (1978), 745-751.
34. J. Mitsiopoulos, Y.Y. Haimes and D. Li, Approximating catastrophic risk through statistics of extremes, Water Resources Res 27(6) (1991), 1223-1230.
35. M.G. Morgan, B. Fischhoff, L. Lave, and P. Fischbeck, "A proposal for risk ranking within federal agencies," Comparing environmental risks: Tools for setting government priorities, J. Clarence Davies (Editor), Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1999.
36. M.G. Morgan, H.K. Florig, M.L. DeKay, and P. Fischbeck, Categorizing risks for risk ranking, Risk Anal 20(1) (2000), 49.
37. National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academies, Making the nation safer: the role of science and technology in countering terrorism, Washington, DC, 2002.
38. J. Pet-Edwards, H.S. Rosenkranz, V. Chankong, and Y.Y. Haimes, Cluster analysis in predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals using short-term assays, Mutation Res 153 (1985a), 167-185.
39. J. Pet-Edwards, V. Chankong, H.S. Rosenkranz, and Y.Y. Haimes, Application of the carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) method to the Gene-Tox data base, Mutation Res 153 (1985b), 187-200.
40. J. Pouzol and M. Ducassé, From declarative signatures to misuse IDS, RAID 2001, LNCS 2212, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001, pp. 1-21.
41. H. Raiffa, Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choice under uncertainty, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1968.
42. A.P. Sage, Methodology for large scale systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1977.
43. R.R. Sokal, Classification: Purposes, principles, progress, prospects, Science, September 27, 1974.
44. A. Toffler, The third wave: the classic study of tomorrow, Bantam Books, New York, 1991.
45. A. Valdes and K. Skinner, Probabilistic alert correlation, RAID 2001, LNCS 2212, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001, pp. 54-68.
46. G. Vigna, R. Kemmerer, and R. Blix, Designing a web of highly-configurable intrusion detection sensors, RAID 2001, LNCS 2212, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001, pp. 69-84.
47. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of games and economic behavior, 3rd edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1953.
48. J.N. Warfield, Social systems-planning and complexity, Wiley, New York, 1976.
49. T. Webler, H. Rakel, O. Renn, and B. Johnson, Eliciting and classifying concerns: A methodological critique, Risk Anal 15(3) (1995), rs.: 421.