A panel interview on the ethical practice of neuropsychology

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 321-344

  Bush, Shane S ^a,e   Grote, Christopher L ^b   Johnson Greene, Doug E ^c   Macartney Filgate, Michele ^d  

^a Independent Practice   (United States)

^b RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Independent Practice   (Canada)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Competence; Ethics; Interview; Neuropsychology

Indexed keywords

ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; REVIEW;

DECISION MAKING; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;

EID: 41949090864     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: 17444144     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13854040601139187     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology. (2003). Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology on ethical complaints made against clinical neuropsychologists during adversarial proceedings. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(4), 443-445.
2. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1610.
3. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060-1073.
4. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2005). ASPPB Code of Conduct. Retrieved January 28, 2005, from http://www.asppb.org/
5. Binder, L. M., & Thompson, L. L. (1995). The ethics code and neuropsychological assessment practices. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 27-46.
6. Bush, S. S. (Ed.). (2005a). A casebook of ethical challenges in neuropsychology. New York: Psychology Press.
7. Bush, S. S. (Guest Editor). (2005b). Ethical issues in forensic neuropsychology [special issue]. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 4(3).
8. Bush, S. S., Connell, M. A., & Denney, R. L. (2006). Ethical practice in forensic psychology: A systematic model for decision making. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Bush, S. S., & Drexler, M. L. (Eds.). (2002). Ethical issues in clinical neuropsychology. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
10. Bush, S. S., & Martin, T. A. (Guest Editors). (2006). Ethical controversies in neuropsychology [special issue]. Applied Neuropsychology, 13(2).
11. Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Tröster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H. et al. (National Academy of Neuropsychology Policy & Planning Committee). (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity. Official position of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 419-426.
12. Committee on Legal Issues, American Psychological Association. (2006). Strategies for private practitioners coping with subpoenas or compelled testimony for client records or test data. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 215-222.
13. Grote, C. (2005). Ethical practice of forensic neuropsychology. In G. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach (pp. 92-114). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14. Hanson, S., Kerkhoff, T., & Bush, S. (2005). Health care ethics for psychologists: A casebook. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Kaufman, P. (2005). Protecting the objectivity, fairness and integrity of neuropsychological evaluations in litigation: A privilege secondary to none? Journal of Legal Medicine, 26, 95-131.
16. Knapp, S., & VandeCreek, L. (2006). Practical ethics for psychologists: A positive approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. McCaffrey, R. J. (Guest Editor). (2005). Third party observers [special issue]. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 4(2).
18. Sweet, J. J. (2005). Ethical challenges in forensic neuropsychology, part V. In S. S. Bush (Ed.), A casebook of ethical challenges in neuropsychology (pp. 15-22). New York: Psychology Press.
19. Sweet, J. J., & Moulthrop, M. A. (1999). Self-examination questions as a means of identifying bias in adversarial assessments. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 1, 73-88.