Applied neuropsychology: Special issue ethical controversies in neuropsychology

Applied Neuropsychology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 63-67

  Bush, Shane S ^a,c   Martin, Thomas A ^b  

^a Independent Practice   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^c ABPP Rp   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COGNITION; CULTURAL FACTOR; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; MEDICAL ETHICS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 33750303032     PISSN: 09084282     EISSN: 15324826     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15324826an1302_1     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073.
3. Bush, S. S. (2005a). Ethical issues in forensic neuropsychology: Introduction. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 4, 1-9.
4. Bush, S. S. (2005b). Ethical challenges in the determination of response validity in neuropsychology: Introduction. In S. S. Bush (Ed.), A casebook of ethical challenges in neuropsychology (p. 228). New York: Psychology Press.
5. Bush, S. S., Connell, M. A., & Denney, R. L. (2006). Ethical practice in forensic psychology: A systematic model for decision making. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Canadian Psychological Association. (1991). Canadian code of ethics for psychologists-revised. Ottawa, Ontario: Author.
7. Chatterjee, A. (2004). Cosmetic neurology: The controversy over enhancing movement, mentation, and mood. Neurology, 63, 968-974.
8. Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655-665.
9. Deidan, C., & Bush, S. (2002). Addressing perceived ethical violations by colleagues. In S. S. Bush & M. L. Drexler (Eds.), Ethical issues in clinical neuropsychology (pp. 281-305). Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger.
10. Farah, M. J., Illes, J., Cook-Deegan, R., Gardner, H., Kandel, E., King, P., et al. (2004). Neurocognitive enhancement: What can we do and what should we do? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 421-425.
11. Haas, L., & Malouf, J. (2002). Keeping up the good work: A practitioner's guide to mental health ethics (3rd ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
12. Kitchener, K. S. (2000). Foundations of ethical practice, research, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Knapp, S., & Vandecreek, L. (2003). A guide to the 2002 revision of the American Psychological Association's Ethics Code. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
14. Knapp, S., & Vandecreek, L. (2004). A principle-based analysis of the 2002 American Psychological Association ethics code. Psychotherapy: Theory, research, practice, training, 41, 247-254.
15. Koocher, G. P., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (1998). Ethics in psychology: Professional standards and cases (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Lees-Haley, P. R., & Fox, D. D. (2001). Isn't everything in forensic neuropsychology controversial? [Special Issue]. Neurorehabilitation, 16, 267-273.
17. Lees-Haley, P. R., & Fox, D. D. (2004). Forensic neuropsychology: Still controversial after all these years. Brain Injury Professional, 1(2), 6-10.
18. Martelli, M. F., Bush, S. S., & Zasler, N. D. (2003). Identifying, avoiding, and addressing ethical misconduct in neuropsychological medicolegal practice. International Journal of Forensic Psychology, 1(1), 26-44. Retrieved September 14, 2005, from http://ijfp.psyc.uow.edu.au/
19. President's Council on Bioethics. (2003). Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. Retrieved December, 1, 2004, from http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/beyondtherapy
20. Wolpe, P. R. (2002). Treatment, enhancement, and the ethics of neurotherapeutics. Brain and Cognition, 50, 387-395.