Examining social trust in fuels management strategies

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 8-15

  Winter, Greg ^a   Vogt, Christine A ^b   McCaffrey, Sarah ^c  

^a 1155 North State Street   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTH CENTRAL RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Fuel treatments; Fuels management; Public acceptance; Public opinion; Resource management; Social trust; Wildland fires

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; NATURAL RESOURCES; RISK PERCEPTION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SURVEYS;

FUELS MANAGEMENT; HOMEOWNERS; SOCIAL TRUSTS;

FUELS;

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; HOMEOWNER; NATURAL HAZARD; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; WILDFIRE;

ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; FUELS; NATURAL RESOURCES; PLANNING; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVEYS;

EID: 5444252193     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jof/102.6.8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. DILLMAN, D.A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley and Sons.
2. EARLE, T.C., AND G.T. CVETKOVICH. 1995. Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society. Westport, CT: Praeger.
3. FLYNN, J., W. BURNS, C.K. MERTZ, AND P. SLOVIC. 1992. Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository: Analysis of a structural model. Risk Analysis 12(3):417-429.
4. HUNT, S., AND L.J. FREWER. 2001. Trust in sources of information about genetically modified food risks in the UK. British Food Journal 103(1):46-63.
5. JOHNSON, B.B. 1999. Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust. Journal of Risk Research 2(4):325-354.
6. JUNGERMANN, H., H.-R. PFISTER, AND K. FISCHER. 1996. Credibility, information preferences, and information interests. Risk Analysis 16(2):251-261.
7. KASPERSON, R.E., D. GOLDING, AND S. TULER. 1992. Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous waste facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues 48(4):161-187.
8. SHINDLER, B., AND E. TOMAN. 2003. Fuel reduction strategies in forest communities: A longitudinal analysis of public support. Journal of Forestry 101(6):8-16.
9. SHINDLER, B.A., M. BRUNSON, AND G.H. STANKEY. 2002. Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: A problem analysis. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-537. Corvallis, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
10. SHINDLER, B.A., AND K. ALDRED-CHEEK. 1999. Integrating citizens in adaptive management: A propositional analysis. Journal of Conservation Ecology 3(1):13.
11. SIEGRIST, M., AND G. CVETKOVICH. 2000. Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis 20(5):713-719.
12. SLOVIC, P. 1993. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis 13(6):675-682.
13. STEEL, B.S., P. LIST, AND B. SHINDLER. 1994. Conflicting values about federal forests: A comparison of national and Oregon publics. Society and Natural Resources 7:137-53.
14. TRACHTMAN, B.B. 2003. Fire Fight. Smithsonian August.
15. TRUMBO, C.W, AND K.A. MCCOMAS. 2003. The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Analysis 23(2):343-353.
16. USDA. 2004. Bush Administration proposes increased funding to maintain and restore forest and rangeland health. Washington, DC: News Release No. 0044.04.
17. USDA/USDOI. 2003. Implementation of Healthy Forests Initiative: The Healthy Forests Restoration Act provides new tools to protect and restore our lands. Washington, DC: Fact Sheet, Release No. fs0405.03.
18. WINTER, G., C.A. VOGT, AND J.S. FRIED. 2002. Fuel treatments at the wildland-urban interface: Common concerns in diverse regions. Journal of Forestry 100(1):15-21.
19. WINTER, P.L., AND G.T. CVETKOVICK. 2003. A study of Southwesterners' opinions on the management of wildland and wilderness fires-Fire Management Version. Riverside, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
20. WINTER, P.L., AND L.J. PALUCKI. 1999. Anticipated responses to a fee program: The key is trust. Journal of Leisure Research 31(3):207-226.