Breakage, slippage and acceptability outcomes of a condom fitted to penile dimensions

Sexually Transmitted Infections

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 143-149

  Reece, M ^a   Herbenick, D ^a   Sanders, S A ^a   Monahan, P ^b   Temkit, M ^b   Yarber, W L ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANUS INTERCOURSE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDOM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PENIS ERECTION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COITUS; CONDOMS; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PENIS;

EID: 41849144851     PISSN: 13684973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/sti.2007.028316     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Reece M, Dodge B, Herbenick D, et al. Experiences of condom fit and feel among African-American men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect 2007;83:454-7.
2. Richters J, Donovan B, Gerofi J. How often do condoms break or slip off in use? Int J STD AIDS 1993;4:90-4.
3. Thomsen S, Stalker M, Toroitich-Ruto C. Fifty ways to leave your rubber: how men in Mombasa rationalize unsafe sex. SexTransm Infect 2004;80:430-4.
4. Potter WD, de Villemeur M. Clinical breakage, slippage and acceptability of a new commercial polyurethane condom: a randomized, controlled study. Contraception 2003;68:39-45.
5. Carey B, Chen I. Why condoms fail (they're too small). Health 1994;8:19.
6. Harding R, Golombok SE. Test-retest reliability of the measurement of penile dimensions in a sample of gay men. Arch Sex Behav 2002;31:351-7.
7. Bogaert AF, Hershberger S. The relation between sexual orientation and penile size (see comment). Arch Sex Behav 1999;28:213-21.
8. Earls CM, Marshall WL. The simultaneous and independent measurement of penile circumference and length. Behav Res Methods Instrument 1982;14:447-50.
9. Jamison PL, Gebhard PH. Penis size increase between flaccid and erect states: an analysis of the Kinsey data. J Sex Res 1988;24:177-83.
10. Kinsey AC, Pameroy WB, Martin CE. Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W B. Saunders Co, 1948.
11. Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual response. Boston: Little Brown, 1966.
12. Richters J, Gerofi J, Donovan B. Why do condoms break or slip off in use? An exploratory study. Int J STD AIDS 1995;6:11-18.
13. Smith AM, Jolley D, Hocking J, et al. Does penis size influence condom slippage and breakage? Int J STD AIDS 1998;9:444-7.
14. Tovey SJ, Bonell CP. Condoms: a wider range needed. BMJ 1993;307:987.
15. World Health Organization. Specifications and guidelines for condom procurement. Geneva: WHO, 1992.
16. Albert AE, Warner DL, Hatcher RA, et al. Condom use among female commercial sex workers in Nevada's legal brothels. Am J Public Health 1995;85:1514-20.
17. Callahan M, Mauck C, Taylor D, et al. Comparative evaluation of three Tactylon™ condoms and a latex condom during vaginal intercourse: breakage and slippage. Contraception 2000;61:205-15.
18. Steiner MJ, Taylor D, Hylton-Kong T, et al. Decreased condom breakage and slippage rates after counseling men at a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Jamaica. Contraception 2007;75:289-93.
19. Frizieres RG, Walsh TL, Nelson AL, et al. Breakage and acceptability of a polyurethane condom: a randomized, controlled study. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:73-8.
20. Frizieres RG, Walsh TL, Nelson AL, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of a polyurethane condom: results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31:81-7.
21. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS. Latex condom breakage and slippage in a controlled clinical trial. Contraception 1997;56:17-21.
22. Trussell J, Warner DL, Hatcher RA. Condom slippage and breakage rates. Fam Plann Perspect 1992;24:20-3.
23. Trussell J, Warner DL, Hatcher RA. Condom performance during vaginal intercourse: comparisons of Trojan-Enz and Tactylon condoms. Contraception 1992;45:11-19.
24. Walsh TL, Frezieres RG, Peacock K et al. Effectiveness of the male latex condom: combined results for three popular condom brands used as controls in randomized clinical trials. Contraception 2004;70:407-13.
25. Steiner M, Piedrahita C, Joanis C, et al. Condom breakage and slippage rates among study participants in eight countries. Intl Fam Plann Perspect 1994;20:55-8.
26. Steiner M, Piedrahita C, Joanis C, et al. Standardized protocols for condom breakage and slippage trials: a proposal. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1897-900.
27. Delucci KL. Sample size estimation in research with dependent measures and dichotomous outcomes. Am J Public Health 2004;94:372-7.
28. Hershberger SL. Low Test-retest reliability does not diminish the value of penile self-measurement. Arch Sex Behav 2003;32:91-2.
29. de Groat WC, Steers WD. Neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of penile erection. In: Tanagho EA, Lue TF, McClure RD, eds. Contemporary management of impotenece and infertility. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1998:3-27.
30. Andersson KE, Wagner G. Physiology of penile erection. Phys Rev 1995;75:191-236.
31. Han JH, Park SH, Lee BS, et al. Erect penile size of Korean men. Venereology 1999;12:135-9.
32. Rosen RC. Sexual function assessment in the male: physiological and self-report measures. Int J Impotence Res 1998;10:S59-63.
33. Koukounas E, Over R. Allocation of attentional resources during habituation and dishabituation of male sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav 1999;28:539-52.
34. Steiner M, Piedrahita C, Glover L, et al. The impact of lubricants on latex condoms during vaginal intercourse. Int J STD AIDS 1994;5:29-36.
35. Gabbay M, Gibbs A. Does additional lubricant reduce condom failure? Contraception 1996;53:155-8.
36. Warner L, Clay-Warner J, Boles J, et al. Assessing condom use practices: implications for evaluating user effectiveness. Sex Transm Dis 1998;25:273-7.
37. Dodge B, Sandfort TGM, Yarber WL, et al. Sexual health among male college students in the United States and the Netherlands. Am J Health Behav 2005;29:172-82.