Low Test-Retest Reliability Does Not Diminish the Value of Penile Self-Measurement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 91-92

  Hershberger, Scott L ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONDOM; HETEROSEXUALITY; HOMOSEXUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LETTER; MEASUREMENT; PENIS; RELIABILITY; SEXUALITY; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; HISTOLOGY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PENIS ERECTION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; HOMOSEXUALITY, MALE; HUMANS; MALE; PENILE ERECTION; PENIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0038500964     PISSN: 00040002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022491322904     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2. Bogaert, A. F., & Hershberger, S. (1999). The relation between sexual orientation and penile size. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 213-221.
3. Harding, R., & Golombok, S. E. (2002). Test-retest reliability of the measurement of penile dimensions in a sample of gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 351-357.
4. Hershberger, S. L., Plomin, R., & Pedersen, N. L. (1995). Traits and metatraits: Their reliability, stability and shared genetic influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 673-685.