Problems of auditing using quality management systems for sustainable development of organizations

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 64-75

  Kaziliünas, Adolfas ^a  

^a MYKOLAS ROMERIS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

ISO standards; Management systems; Quality environment systems audit

Indexed keywords

EID: 41849139622     PISSN: 20294913     EISSN: 20294921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/2029-0187.2008.14.64-75     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Biazzo, S. 2005. The new ISO 9001 and the problem of ceremonial conformity: how have audits methods evolved? Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 16(3): 381-399.
2. Bransky, J. R. 2004. Raising the credibility of third party certification to ISO 9001:2000, ISO Management Systems 5(6): 7.
3. Calisir, F.; Kulak, O.; Dogan, I. 2005. Factors influencing Turkish textile companies' satisfaction with ISO 9000, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 16(10): 1193-1204.
4. Gagnier, D.; Smith, T.; Pyle, J. 2005. The future of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000, ISO Management Systems 6(1): 11-14.
5. Hasan, J. S. 2004. ISO 9001 Made Easy, Quality Progress 37(5): 104.
6. ISO 9000:2005 Quality management systems -Fundamentals and vocabulary. Management Centre: rue de Stassart, 36 B-1050 Brussels, 2005.
7. Hoyle, D.; Thompson, J. 2001. ISO 9000:2000 Auditor Questions, Monmouth: Transition Support Ltd, 1-20.
8. Hughes, S.; Karapetrovic, S. 2006. ISO 1002 Complaints handling system: a study, International Journal of Quality and Reliability 23(9): 11.58-1175.
9. Dearing, Jack. 2007. ISO 9001: Could it be better ? Quality Progress 40(2): 23-27.
10. th International Conference "Citizens and Governance for Sustainable Development ", Vilnius, 2006, 221-225.
11. Lin, Chinko; Wu, Chuni. 2005. A knowledge creation model for ISO 9001:2000, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 16(5): 657-670.
12. ISO 9001:2000. Quality management systems - Requirements. Management Centre: rue de Stassart, 36 B-1050 Brussels, 2000.
13. ISO 1901.1:2002. Guidelines for Quality and/or Environmental Management Systems Auditing. Management Centre: rue de Stassart, 36 B-1050 Brussels, 2002.
14. Lundmark, E.; Westelius, A. 2006. Effects of quality management according to ISO 9000: A Swedish study of the transit to ISO 9000:2000, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 17(8): 1021-1042.
15. Michaela, M. C.; Lorente, M.; Rafael, A. 2007. ISO 9000:2000: Key to Quality? An Exploratory Study, Quality Management Journal 14(1): 7-18.
16. Naceur, J.; Abdullah, A. H. 2005. Leadership Styles Supporting ISO 9000:2000, Quality Management Journal 12(1): 21-29.
17. Peterson, F. 2005. Pay closer attention to needs of audit clients, ISO Management Systems 6(1): 5-9.
18. Good Corporation model, 2005. Available from Internet: 〈http://www.goodcorporation.com/en/〉.
19. Poksinska, B.; Dahlgaard, J. J.; Jörgen, A.; Eklund, E. 2006. From compliance to value-added auditing-experiences from Swedish ISO 9001:2000 certified Organizations, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 17(7): 879-892.
20. Reid, R. Dan 2004. Tips for Automotive Auditors, Quality Progress 37(5): 72-75.
21. Rodriguez-Escobar, J. A.; Gonzalez-Benito, J.; Martinez-Lorente, A. R. 2006. An analysis of degree of small companies' dissatisfaction with ISO 9000 certification, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 1.7(4): 507-521.
22. Russell, J. P. 2007. Know and follow ISO 19011's auditing principles, Quality Progress 40(2): 29-34.
23. Terziovski, M.; Power, D. 2007. Increasing ISO 9000 certification benefits: a continuous improvement approach, International Journal of Quality and Reliability 24(2): 141-163.
24. Van der Wiele, T.; van Iwaarden, J. 2005. Perceptions about the ISO 9000:2000 quality system standard revision and its value: Dutch experience, International Journal of Quality and Reliability 22(2): 101-119.