Population genetic structure of the relict Serbian spruce, Picea omorika, inferred from plastid DNA

Plant Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 271, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 1-7

  Nasri, N ^a,d   Bojovic, S ^b   Vendramin, G G ^c   Fady, B ^a  

^a French National Institute for Agriculture   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^c CNR   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TUNIS EL MANAR   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Chloroplast microsatellite; Demographic bottleneck; Genetic drift; Glacial refugium; Picea omorika

Indexed keywords

CONIFEROPHYTA; PICEA; PICEA OMORIKA;

EID: 41849113828     PISSN: 03782697     EISSN: 16156110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-007-0594-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ballian D, Longauer R, Mikic T, Paule L, Kajba D and Gömöry D (2006). Genetic structure of a rare European conifer, Serbian spruce (Picea omorika [Pančić] Purkyně). Pl Syst Evol 260: 53-63
2. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (1996) GENETIX 4.02, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations, Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions; CNRS UMR 5000; Université Montpellier II, Montpellier (France) http://www.univ-montp2. fr/∼genetix/genetix/genetix.htm
3. Bucci G, Anzidei M, Madaghiele A and Vendramin GG (1998). Detection of haplotypic variation and natural hybridization in halepensis-complex pine species using chloroplast simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Molec Ecol 7: 1633-1643
4. Comes HP and Kandereit JW (1998). The effect of Quaternary climatic changes on plant distribution and evolution. Trends Pl Sci 11: 432-438
5. Čolić D and Gigov A (1958). Asocijacija sa Pančićevom omorikom (Picea omorika Panč) na močvarnom staništu. Biološki institut NR Srbije, Beograd
6. Echt CS, DeVerno LL, Anzidei M and Vendramin GG (1998). Chloroplast microsatellites reveal population genetic diversity in red pine, Pinus resinosa Ait. Molec Ecol 7: 307-316
7. Felsenstein J (2003) PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package v. 3.61. University of Washington, Seattle, http://evolution.gs.washington.edu/phylip. html
8. Geburek TH (1986). Some results of inbreeding depression in Serbian spruce (Picea omorika [Panč.] Purkyně). Silvae Genet 35: 169-172
9. Gitzendanner MA and Soltis PS (2000). Patterns of genetic variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. Amer J Bot 87: 783-792
10. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Heredity 86: 485-486. Available from: http://www2.unil.ch/ popgen/softwares/fstat.htm
11. Gugerli F, Sperisen C, Büchler U, Magni F, Geburek T, Jeandroz S and Senn J (2001). Haplotype variation in a mitochondrial tandem repeat of Norway spruce (Picea abies) populations suggests a serious founder effect during postglacial recolonization of the western Alps. Molec Ecol 10: 1255-1263
12. Huntley B and Birks HJB (1983). An atlas of past and present pollen maps for Europe, 0-13 000 years ago. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
13. Kuittinen H, Muona O, Kärkkäien K and Borzan Ž (1991). Serbian spruce, a narrow endemic, contains much genetic variation. Canad J Forest Res 21: 363-367
14. Ledig FT, Conkle MT, Bermejo-Velásquez B, Eguiluz-Piedra T, Hodgskiss PD, Johnson DR and Dvorak WS (1999). Evidence for an extreme bottleneck in a rare Mexican pinyon: genetic diversity, disequilibrium and the mating system in Pinus maximartinezii. Evolution 53: 91-99
15. Mantel N (1967). The detection of disease clustering and generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27: 209-220
16. Nei M (1987). Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York
17. Petit RJ, Aguinagalde I, Bittkau C, Brewer S, Cheddadi R, Ennos R, Fineschi S, Grivet D, Lascoux M, Mohanty A, Müller-Starck G, Demesure-Musch B, Palmé A, Martín JP, Rendell S, Vendramin GG and Beaulieu JL (2003). Glacial refugia: Hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 300: 1563-1565
18. Petit RJ, Duminil J, Fineschi S, Hampe A, Salvini D and Vendramin GG (2005). Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Molec Ecol 14: 689-701
19. Provan J, Soranzo N, Wilson NJ, Goldstein DB and Powell W (1999). A low mutation rate for chloroplast microsatellites. Genetics 153: 943-947
20. Ran JH, Wei X and Wang X (2006). Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Picea (Pinaceae): Implications for phylogeographical studies using cytoplasmic haplotypes. Molec Phylogenet Evol 41: 405-419
21. Ravazzi C (2002). Late Quaternary history of spruce in southern Europe. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 120: 131-177
22. Saitou N and Nei M (1987). The neighbour-joining method: a new model for reconstruction phylogenetic trees. Molec Biol Evol 4: 406-425
23. Vendramin GG, Lelli L, Rossi P and Morgante M (1996). A set of primers for the amplification of 20 chloroplast microsatellite in Pinaceae Molec Ecol 5: 595-598
24. Vendramin GG, Anzidei M, Madaghiele A, Sperisen C and Bucci G (2000). Chloroplast microsatellites analysis reveals the presence of population subdivision in Norway spruce. Genome 43: 68-78
25. Young A, Boyle T and Brown T (1996). The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 413-418