Preoperative evaluation of venous systems with computed tomography venography in parasagittal meningiomas

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 293-297

  Zhen, Junping ^a,b   Liu, Cheng ^b   Jiang, Baodong ^a   He, Jingzhen ^a   Pang, Qi ^a   Wang, Guangbin ^b  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SHANDONG MEDICAL IMAGING RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (China)

Author keywords

Collateral venous anastomoses; CT venography; Parasagittal meningiomas; Superior sagittal sinus; Venous infiltration

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY;

COLLATERAL VENOI ANASTOMOSE; CT VENOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; INTRA-OPERATIVE; MENINGIOMAS; PARASAGITTAL MENINGIOMA; SUPERIOR SAGITTAL SINUS; SURGICAL PLANNING; VENOGRAPHY; VENOI INFILTRATION;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENINGIOMA; NEURORADIOLOGY; NEUROSURGERY; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPERIOR SAGITTAL SINUS; VEIN ANASTOMOSIS; VENOUS CIRCULATION;

EID: 41749100165     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3180ca9565     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Buster WP, Rodas RA, Fenstermaker RA, et al. Major venous sinus resection in the surgical treatment of recurrent aggressive dural based tumors. Surg Neurol. 2004;62:522-530.
2. Akeyson EW, McCutcheon IE. Management of benign and aggressive intracranial meningiomas. Oncology (Williston Park). 1996;10:747-759.
3. Ayerbe J, Lobato R, de la Cruz J, et al. Risk factors predicting recurrence in patients operated on for intracranial meningioma: a multivariate analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999;141:921-932.
4. Bonnal J, Brotchi J. Surgery of the superior sagittal sinus in parasagittal meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 1978;48:935-945.
5. Carella RJ, Ransohoff J, Newall J. Role of radiation therapy in the management of meningioma. Neurosurgery. 1982;10:332-339.
6. Murata J, Sawamura Y, Saito H, et al. Resection of a recurrent parasagittal meningioma with cortical vein anastomosis: technical note. Surg Neurol. 1997;48:592-597.
7. Palma L, Celli P, Franco C, et al. Long-term prognosis for atypical and malignant meningiomas: a study of 71 surgical cases. J Neurosurg. 1997;86:793-800.
8. Lee JM, Jung S, Moon KS, et al. Preoperative evaluation of venous systems with 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography in brain tumors: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance venography and digital subtraction angiography. Surg Neurol. 2005;64:128-134.
9. Haroun A. Utility of contrast-enhanced 3D turbo-flash MR angiography in evaluating the intracranial venous system. Neuroradiology. 2005;47:322-327.
10. Wasay M, Azeemuddin M. Neuroimaging of cerebral venous thrombosis. J Neuroimaging. 2005;15:118-128.
11. Rodallec MH, Krainik A, Feydy A, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis and multidetector CT angiography: tips and tricks. Radiographics. 2006;26(suppl 1):S5-S18.
12. Leach JL, Fortuna RB, Jones BV, et al. Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis: current techniques, spectrum of findings, and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics. 2006;26(suppl 1):S19-S41.
13. Krishnan A, Mattox DE, Fountain AJ, et al. CT arteriography and venography in pulsatile tinnitus: preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1635-1638.
14. Matsumoto M, Kodama N, Sakuma J, et al. 3D-CT arteriography and 3D-CT venography: the separate demonstration of arterial-phase and venous-phase on 3D-CT angiography in a single procedure. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:635-641.
15. Teksam M, Casey S, McKinney A, et al. Anatomy and frequency of large pontomesencephalic veins on 3D CT angiograms of the circle of Willis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1598-1601.
16. Casey SO, Alberico RA, Patel M, et al. Cerebral CT venography. Radiology. 1996;198:163-170.
17. Widjaja E, Shroff M, Blaser S, et al. 2D time-of-flight MR venography in neonates: anatomy and pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1913-1918.
18. Connor SE, Jarosz JM. Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:449-461.
19. Mattle HP, Wentz KU, Edelman RR, et al. Cerebral venography with MR. Radiology. 1991;178:453-458.
20. Kudo K, Terae S, Ishii A, et al. Physiologic change in flow velocity and direction of dural venous sinuses with respiration: MR venography and flow analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:551-557.
21. Tomandl BF, Hastreiter P, Rezk-Salama C, et al. Local and remote visualization techniques for interactive direct volume rendering in neuroradiology. Radiographics. 2001;21:1561-1572.
22. Blank M, Kalender WA. Medical volume exploration: gaining insights virtually. Eur J Radiol. 2000;33:161-169.
23. Bozzao A, Finocchi V, Romano A, et al. Role of contrast-enhanced MR venography in the preoperative evaluation of parasagittal meningiomas. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1790-1796.
24. Wetzel SG, Kirsch E, Stock KW, et al. Cerebral veins: comparative study of CT venography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:249-255.
25. Sajjad Z. MRI and MRV in cerebral venous thrombosis. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006;56:523-526.
26. Nael K, Fenchel M, Salamon N, et al. Three-dimensional cerebral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography at 3.0 Tesla: initial results using highly accelerated parallel acquisition. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:763-768.
27. Rollins N, Ison C, Booth T, et al. MR venography in the pediatric patient. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:50-55.
28. Loubeyre P, De Jaegere T, Tran-Minh VA. Three-dimensional phase contrast MR cerebral venography with zero filling interpolation in the slice encoding direction. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;17:1227-1233.
29. Ozsvath RR, Casey SO, Lustrin ES, et al. Cerebral venography: comparison of CT and MR projection venography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1699-1707.
30. Chawla S. Advances in multidetector computed tomography: applications in neuroradiology. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28 (suppl 1):S12-S16.
31. Majoie CB, van Straten M, Venema HW, et al. Multisection CT venography of the dural sinuses and cerebral veins by using matched mask bone elimination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:787-791.