Consumer choice in Dutch health insurance after reform

Health Care Analysis

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 37-49

  Maarse, Hans ^a   Ter Meulen, Ruud ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consumer choice; Health care reform; Health insurance; Market competition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; LAW; NETHERLANDS;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HEALTH CARE SECTOR; HUMANS; INSURANCE, HEALTH; NETHERLANDS; PATERNALISM; PRIVATE SECTOR; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;

EID: 33749844249     PISSN: 10653058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10728-006-0010-z     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. CPB (Centraal Planbureau) (2005) Switch on the Competition: Causes, Consequences and Policy Implications of Consumer Switching Costs. The Hague
2. Daniels N (2000) Accountability for Reasonableness in Private and Public Health Insurance. In: A. Coulter and C. Ham (eds.), The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing. Buckingham/ Philadelphia: Open University Press: 89-106
3. De Heij L (2004) Zorgverzekeringswet kan tot minder zorgverbetering leiden. ESB, 9-7-2004:320-321
4. Evans R (1998) Going for the Gold: the Redistributive Agenda behind Market-Based Health Care Reform. In: M.Peterson, Healthy Markets? The New Competition in Medical Care. Durham/London: Duke University Press:66-102
5. Hirschman A (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press
6. Hirsch F (1977) Social Limits to Growth. London: Routledge
7. IOO (Instituut voor Onderzoek van Overheidsuitgaven) (2000) Concurrentie tussen particuliere ziektekostenverzekeraars. Den Haag
8. Kerssens J, Groenewegen P (2005) Consumer preferences in social health insurance. European Journal of Health Economics 50:8-15
9. th European conference on health economics, Paris
10. Laske-Aldershof T, Schut F (2005) Monitor verzekerdenmobiliteit. Rotterdam: iBMG
11. Maarse J, Paulus A (2003) Has Solidarity Survived? A Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Social Health Insurance Reform in Four European Countries. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 28(4), 585-614
12. Maarse J, Okma K (2004) The Privatisation Paradox in Dutch Health Care. In: J. Maarse (ed), Privatisation in European Health Care. Maarssen: Elsevier: 97-116
13. Maarse H, Paulus A A, Kuiper G (2005) Supervision in Social Health Insurance: a Four-Country Study. Health Policy 71(3), 333-346
14. Motta M (2004) Competition Policy. Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
15. Porter M, Olmsted Teisberg E (2004) Redefining Competition in Health Care. Harvard Business Review, on line version, June (www.hbsp.org)
16. Rice T (2001) Should Consumer Choice be Encouraged in Health Care? In: J. Davis (ed.) The Social Economics of Health Care. London: Routledge
17. Schwartz B (2004) The Paradox of Choice - Why More is Less. Harper Collins Publishers
18. Ter Meulen R (1995) Limiting Solidarity in the Netherlands: a Two-Tier System on the Way. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20, 607-616
19. Van de Ven W, Ellis R (2000) Risk Adjustment in Competitive Health Policy Markets. In: A. Culyer, J. Newhouse (eds.) Handbook of Health Economics, volume 1A. Amsterdam: Elsevier, chapter 14
20. Van de Ven W, Prinsze F, de Bruijn D, Schut F (2005) Nieuw zorgstelsel vereist betere risicoverevening. Economisch Statistische Berichten 20-5-2005: 223-225
21. Van Dijk M, Pomp M, Laske-Aldershof T, Schut E, Boer W, de Boo A, Smit M (2005) Consumer Price Sensitivity in Social Health Insurance. The Hague: discussion paper
22. Vektis (2005) Verzekeringsmonitor (www.vektis.nl). Accessed July 14, 2005