Applications of multislice coronary computed tomographic angiography to percutaneous coronary intervention: How did we ever do without it?

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 490-503

  Hecht, Harvey S ^a  

^a LENOX HILL HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Imaging (CT MR); Percutaneous coronary intervention; Quantitative coronary angiography

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; CALCIFICATION; CATHETERIZATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DECISION MAKING; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART ATRIUM SEPTUM DEFECT; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RESTENOSIS; REVIEW; STENT; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONGENITAL HEART MALFORMATION; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HEART SURGERY; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 41649110531     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21427     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, Douglas PS. Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA 1998;280:913-920.
2. Hecht HS, Roubin G. Usefulness of computed tomographic angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:871-875.
3. Lima RSL, Watson DD, Goode AR, et al. Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42; 64-70.
4. Berman DS, Kang X, Slomka PJ, et al. Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated spect myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left brain coronary disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:521-528.
5. Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings: Importance of lumen dimensions. Circulation 1999;100:256-261.
6. Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Ishii Y, et al. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1999; 100:250-255.
7. Nishioka T, Amanullah AM, Luo H, et al. Clinical validation of intravascular ultrasound imaging for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1870-1878.
8. Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:839-848.
9. Bech GJW, Bruyne BD, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis. A randomized trial. Circulation 2001;103:2928-2934.
10. Ragosta M, Bishop AH, Lipson LC, et al. Comparison between angiography and fractional flow reserve versus single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging for determining lesion significance in patients with multivessel coronary disease. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:896-902.
11. Christou MAC, Siontisa GCM, Katritsis DG, et al. Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:450-456.
12. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Hoffmann U, et al. Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:842-847.
13. Moselewski F, Ropers D, Pohle K, et al. Measurement of cross-sectional coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vessel areas by 16-slice multi-detector CT: Comparison to IVUS. Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1294-1297.
14. Caussin C, Larchez C, Ghostine S, et al. Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by sixty-four-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:871-876.
15. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2567-2572.
16. Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2204-2210.
17. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:951-959.
18. Hecht HS, Zaric M, Jelnin V, et al. Detection of in-stent restenosis by 64-detector computed tomographic angiography. Am J Cardiol, in press.
19. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer C, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/ SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/ SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1475-1497.
20. Holmes DR, Kereiakes DJ, Laskey WK, et al. Thrombosis and drug-eluting stents: An objective appraisal. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:109-118.
21. Mollet NR, Hoye A, Lemos PA, et al. Value of preprocedure multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to predict the outcome of percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:240-243.
22. Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A, et al. Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37: 1430-1435.
23. Caussin C, Ohanessian A, Lancelin B, et al. Coronary plaque burden detected by multislice computed tomography after acute myocardial infarction with near-normal coronary arteries by an-giography. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:849-842.
24. Caussin C, Ohanessian A, Ghostine S, et al. Characterization of vulnerable nonstenotic plaque with 16-slice computed tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 2004;94:99-104.
25. Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A, et al. Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: A comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1241-1247.
26. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: A segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2004;109:14-17.
27. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Prevalence of non-calcified coronary plaques by 64-slice computed tomography in patients with an intermediate risk for significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:312-318.
28. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Nieman K, et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1655-1662.
29. Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system. A comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:672-677.
30. Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, et al. The thin-fibrous cap fibroatheroma: A type of vulnerable plaque: The major precursor lesion to acute coronary syndromes. Curr Opin Cardiol 2001;16: 285-292.
31. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden coronary death: A comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:1262-1275.
32. Varnava AM, Mills PG, Davies MJ. Relationship between coronary artery remodeling and plaque vulnerability. Circulation 2002; 105:939-943.
33. von Birgelen C, Klinkhart W, Mintz GS, et al. Plaque distribution and vascular remodeling of ruptured and nonruptured coronary plaques in the same vessel: An intravascular ultrasound study in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1864-1870.