Investigating the relationships among instructional strategies and learning styles in online environments

Computers and Education

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1451-1461

  Akdemir, Omur ^a   Koszalka, Tiffany A ^b  

^a ZONGULDAK KARAELMAS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Instructional strategies; Learning styles; Online courses

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES; LEARNER PERCEPTIONS; LEARNING STYLES; ONLINE COURSES;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 41649085772     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abraham R. Field independence-dependence and the teaching of grammar. TESOL Quarterly 2 (1985) 689-702
2. Aragon S.R., Johnson S.D., and Shaik N. The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments. American Journal of Distance Education 16 (2002) 227-244
3. Centra J. The development of student instructional report II. Educational Testing Service (1998)
4. Claxton, C. S. & Murrell, P. H. (1987). Learning styles: implications for improving educational practices. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
5. Evan, F. (1969). The psychological differentiation inventory: a questionnaire measure of field dependence. In: A paper presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia, PA, April 1969.
6. Federico P. Learning styles and student attitudes toward various aspects of network-based instruction. Computers in Human Behavior 16 (2000) 359-379
7. Gilbert L., and Moore D. Building interactivity in Web courses: tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology 38 (1998) 29-35
8. Hamilton-Pennell C. Getting ahead by getting online. Library Journal 127 (2002) 32-35
9. Jonassen D.H., Grabinger R.S., and Harris N.D.C. Analyzing instructional strategies and tactics. Performance and Instruction Quarterly 3 (1990) 29-45
10. Jonassen D.H., and Grabowski B.L. Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
11. Kidney G., and Puckett E. Rediscovering the first principles through online learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4 (2003) 203-212
12. Koszalka T., and Ganesan R. Designing online courses: a taxonomy to guide strategic use of features available in course management systems (CMS) in distance education. Distance Education 25 2 (2004) 243-256
13. Macneil R. The relationship of cognitive style and instructional style to the learning performance of undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Research 73 (1980) 354-359
14. Mitchell J.L. The effect of matching teaching style with learning style on achievement and attitudes for women in web-based distance education course (2000), Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN
15. Muir, D. J. (2001). Adapting online education to different learning styles. National Educational Computing Conference, Chicago, IL.
16. Oliver R. Exploring strategies for online teaching and learning. Distance Education 20 (1999) 240-250
17. Ormrod J.E. Human learning (1999), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
18. Robles M., and Braathen S. Online assessment techniques. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal 44 (2002) 39-49
19. Roblyer M.D., and Wiencke W.R. Design and use of a rubric to assess and encourage interactive qualities in distance courses. The American Journal of Distance Education 17 (2003) 77-98
20. Smith P.L., and Ragan T.J. Instructional design (1999), Wiley, New York, NY
21. Thurmond V.A., Wambach K., and Connors H.R. Evaluation of student satisfaction: determining the impact of a WBE by controlling for student characteristics. American Journal of Distance Education 16 (2002) 169-189
22. Witkin H.A., Oltman P.T., Raskin E., and Karp S.A. Group embedded figures test manual (1971), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto