Learning styles and student attitudes toward various aspects of network-based instruction

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 359-379

  Federico, Pat Anthony ^a  

^a NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; DISTANCE EDUCATION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; ONLINE SYSTEMS; STATISTICAL METHODS; STUDENTS;

ACCOMODATING LEARNING STYLE; ASSIMILATING LEARNING STYLE; CONVERGING LEARNING STYLE; DIVERGING LEARNING STYLE; LEARNING STYLES; MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES; NETWORK BASED INSTRUCTION; STUDENT ATTITUDES; UNIVARIATE STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 0034229636     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00021-2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Burbules N., Callister T. Knowledge at the crossroads. some alternative futures of hypertext learning environments Educational Technology. 46:1996;23-50.
2. Curry L. Integrating concepts of cognitive or learning style: a review with attention to psychometric standards. 1987;Canadian College of Health Service Executives, Ottawa, Ontario.
3. Cyrs T., Conway E. Teaching at a distance with the merging technologies: an instructional systems approach. 1997;Center for Educational Development, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, MN.
4. Ekstrom R., French J., Harman H., Dermen D. Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. 1976;Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
5. Federico P-A. Adaptive instruction: trends and issues. Snow R., Federico P-A., Montague W. Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 1, Cognitive process analyses of aptitude. 1980;1-26 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. Federico P-A. Cerebral, cognitive, and conative processes. Snow R., Farr M. Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 3, Conative and affective process analyses. 1987;99-130 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
7. Federico P-A. Student cognitive attributes and performance in a computer-managed instructional setting. Dillon R., Pellegrino J. Instruction: theoretical and applied perspectives. 1991;16-46 Praeger, New York.
8. Federico, P-A. (1997). Internet-based instruction to supplement traditional and nontraditional education provided by the naval postgraduate school: technology, advantages and disadvantages, issues, and recommendations (TM 97-1). Monterey, CA: Institute for Defense Education and Analysis, Naval Postgraduate School.
9. Federico, P-A. (1998). Using students' log files to uncover navigational paths through hypermedia environments for adapting instruction (IDEA TM 98-2). Monterey, CA: Institute for Defense Education and Analysis, Naval Postgraduate School.
10. Federico P-A. Hypermedia environments and adaptive instruction. Computers in Human Behavior. 15:1999;653-692.
11. Geller L. Reliability of the learning style inventory. Psychological Reports. 44:1979;555-561.
12. Hickcox L. Learning styles: a survey of adult learning style inventory models. Sims R., Sims S. The importance of learning styles: understanding the implications for learning, course design, and education. 1995;25-46 Greenwood, Westport, CT.
13. Jacobson M. Issues in hypertext and hypermedia research. toward a framework for linking theory-to-design Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 3:1994;141-154.
14. Jonassen D. Hypertext principles for text and courseware design. Educational Psychologist. 21:1986;269-292.
15. Jonassen D. Hypertext/hypermedia. 1989;Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
16. Jonassen D. Conceptual frontiers in hypermedia environments for learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 2:1993;331-335.
17. Keegan D. Foundations of distance education. 1996;Routledge, London.
18. Kolb, D. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A. Chickering, & Associates, The modern American college (pp. 232-255). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Kolb D. Experiential learning: experiences as the source of learning and development. 1984;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
20. Kommers P., Grabinger S., Dunlap J. Hypermedia learning environments: instructional design and integration. 1996;Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
21. Large A. Hypertext instructional programs and learner control. a research review Education for Information. 4:1996;95-106.
22. Marshall J. The examination of a learning style typology. Research in Higher Education. 26:1987;417-429.
23. Milheim W., Martin B. Theoretical bases for the use of learner control. three different perspectives Journal of Computer-Based Instruction. 18:1991;99-105.
24. Nix D., Spiro R. Cognition, education, and multimedia: exploring ideas in high technology. 1990;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
25. PC novice guide to the internet. 1996;Peed Corp, Lincoln, NE.
26. Smith D., Kolb D. User's guide for the learning-style inventory: a manual for teachers and trainers. 1996;Hay/McBer Training Resources Group, Hillsdale, NJ.
27. Spiro, R., Coulton, R., Feltovich, P., & Anderson, D. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Tenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375-383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Spiro R., Vispoel W., Schmitz J., Samarapungavan A., Boerger A. Knowledge acquisition for application: cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. Britton B., Glynn S. Executive control processing in reading. 1987;177-199 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
29. Tergan, S. (1997). Multiple views, contexts, and symbol systems in learning with hypertext/hypermedia: a critical review of research. Educational Technology, July-August, 5-18.
30. Vosniadou S., De Corte E., Glaser R., Mandl H. International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments. 1996;Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
31. Wilson F., Jonassen D. Hypertext and instructional design. some preliminary guidelines Performance Improvement Quarterly. 2:1989;34-49.