A view on VR-enhanced rehabilitation robotics

Fifth International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation, IWVR 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 149-154

  Riener, Robert ^a,b   Wellner, Mathias ^b   Nef, Tobias ^b   Von Zitzewitz, Joachim ^b   Duschau Wicke, Alexander ^b,c   Colombo, Gery ^b   Lünenburger, Lars ^b  

^a IEEE

^b BALGRIST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^c HOCOMA AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAIT ANALYSIS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PERSONNEL TRAINING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

CLINICAL TESTING; TRAINING SESSIONS;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 41649083966     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/iwvr.2006.1707544     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. H. Barbeau, S. Rossignol, "Enhancement of locomotor recovery following spinal cord injury," Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 7, pp. 517-524, 1994.
2. V. Dietz, G. Colombo, L. Jensen, "Locomotor activity in spinal man," Lancet, vol. 44, pp. 1260-1263,1994.
3. S. Hesse, C. Bertclt, M.T. Jahnke, A. Schaffrin, P. Baake, M. Malezic, et al., "Treadmill Training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients," Stroke, vol. 26, pp. 976-981, 1995.
4. T. Platz, T. ,Evidenzbasierte Armrehabilitation: Eine systematische Literaturübersicht", Nervenarzt, 74, pp. 841-849, 2003.
5. G. Kwakkel, R.C. Wagenaar, T.W. Koelman, G.J. Lankhorst, and J.C. Koetsier "Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis," Stroke, 28, pp. 1550-1556, 1997.
6. S. Hesse, D. Uhlenbrock "A mechanized gait trainer for restoration of gait," J Rehab Res Dev;37:701-708, 2000.
7. D.J. Reinkensmeyer, J.H. Wynne, S.J. Harkema, ,A robotic tool for studying locomotor adaptation and rehabilitation" Second Joint Meeting of the IEEE, EMBS and BMES 2002, pp. 2353-2354, 2002
8. D. Reinkensmeyer, D. Aoyagi, J. Emken, J. Galvez, W. Ichinose, G. Kerdanyan, J. Nessler, S. Maneekobkunwong, et al., "Robotic gait training: toward more natural movements and optimal training algorithms," Proc. IEEE EMBS Conference, San Francisco, Sept. 2004, pp. 4818-4821.
9. G. Colombo, M. Jörg, R. Schreier, V. Dietz, "Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosist," J. of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 37, pp. 693-700, 2000.
10. G. Colombo, M. Jörg, S. Jezernik, "Automatisiertes Lokomotionstraining auf dem Laufband," Automatisierungstechnik at, vol. 50, p. 287-295, 2002.
11. S. Hesse, G. Schulte-Tigges, M. Konrad, A. Bardeleben, and C. Werner, "Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects," Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 84, pp. 915-920, 2003.
12. J.A. Cozens, "Robotic assistance of an active upper limb exercise in neurologically impaired patients," IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng., 7, pp. 254-256, 1999.
13. W. Harwin, R. Loureiro, F. Amirabdollahian, M. Taylor, G. Johnson, E. Stokes, S. Coote, M. Topping, C. Collin, et al., "The Gentle/s project: a new method for delivering neuro-rehabilitation. Assistive Technology Added Value to the Quality of Life" AAATE'01, C. Marincek et al. (Eds.), IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 36-41, 2001.
14. R.Q. Van der Linde, P. Lammertse, E. Frederiksen, and B. Ruiter, "The HapticMaster, a new nigh-performance haptic interface," Proc. Eurohaptics, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 1-5, 2002
15. H.I. Krebs, N. I-Iogan, M.L. Aisen, B.T. Volpe, "Robot-aided neurorehabilitation," IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng., 6, pp. 75-87, 1998.
16. P.S. Lum, C.G. Burgar, P.C. Shor, M. Majmundar, and M. van der Loos, "Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke," Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 83, pp. 952-959, 2002.
17. R. Riener, T. Nef, G. Colombo, "Robot-aided Neurorehabilitation for the upper extremities," Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 43(1), pp. 2-10.
18. Cozean C, Pease W, Hubbell S. Biofeedback and functional electric stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:401405.
19. Moreland JD, Thomson MA, Fuoco AR. Electromyographic biofeedback to improve lower extremity function after stroke: A meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:134-140.
20. Bolek JE. A preliminary study of modification of gait in real-time using surface electromyography. Appl Psychophys Biof. 2003;28:129-138.
21. Petrofsky JS. The use of electromyogram biofeedback to reduce Trendelenburg gait. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;85:491-495.
22. Mandel AR, Nymark JR, Balmer SJ, Grinnell DM, Oriain MD. Electromyographic versus rhythmic positional biofeedback in computerized gait retraining with stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:649-654.
23. Colborne GR, Olney SJ, Griffin MP. Feedback of ankle joint angle and soleus electromyography in the rehabilitation of hemiplegic gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1100-1106.
24. Morris ME, Matyas TA, Bach TM, Goldie PA. Electrogoniometric feedback - its effect on Genu Recurvatum in stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:1147-1154.
25. Aruin AS, Sharma A, Larkins R, Chaudhuri G. Knee position feedback: its effect on management of pelvic instability in a stroke patient. Disabil Rehab. 2000;22:690-692.
26. Hirokawa S, Matsumura K. Biofeedback gait training system for temporal and distance factors. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1989;27:8-13.
27. Montoya R, Dupui P, Pages B, Bessou P. Step-length biofeedback device for walk rehabilitation. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1994;32:416-420.
28. Phillips CA, Koubek RJ, I-Iendershot DM. Walking while using a sensory tactile feedback-system - potential use with a functional electrical stimulation orthosis. J Biomed Engin 1991 ; 13:91-96.
29. de Castro MCF, Cliquet A. Artificial sensorimotor integration in spinal cord injured subjects through neuromuscular and electrotactile stimulation. Artificial Organs 2000;24:710-717.
30. Batavia M, Gianutsos JG, Vaccaro A, Gold JT. A do-it-yourself membrane-activated auditory feedback device for weight bearing and gait training: A case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:541-545.
31. Batavia M, Gianutsos JG, Kambouris M. An augmented auditory feedback device. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1389-1392.
32. Fernery VG, Moretto PG, Hespel JMG, Thevcnon A, Lensel G. A realtime plantar pressure feedback device for foot unloading. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1724-1728.
33. Van Peppen RPS, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJM, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: What's the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:833-862.
34. Teasell RW, Bhogal SK, Foley NC, Speechley MR. Gait retraining post stroke. Top Stroke Rehab. 2003;10:34-65.
35. Jack D, Boian R, Merians AS, Tremaine M, Burdea GC, Adamovich SV, Recce M, Poizner H. Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2001;9:308-318.
36. Burdea G, Popescu V, Vincent H, Colbert K. Virtual reality-based orthopedic telerehabilitation. IEEE Transaction on Rehabilitation Engineering 2000;8:430-432.
37. Bardorfer A, Munih M. Upper limb motion analysis using haptic interface. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 2001;6:84-87.
38. Girone M, Burdea G, Bouzit M, Popescu V. Orthopedic rehabilitation using the "Rutgers Ankle" interface. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2000;70:89-95.
39. Ohsuga M, Tatsuno Y, Shimono F, Hirasawa K, Oyama H, Okamura H. Development of a bedside wellness system. CyberPsychology & Behavior 1998;1:99-106.
40. Riva G. Virtual reality in paraplegia: a VR-enhanced orthopaedic appliance for walking and rehabilitation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 1998;58:209-218.
41. Fung J, Malouin F, McFadyen BJ, Comeau F, Lamontagne A, Chapdelaine S, Beaudoin C, Laurendeau D, Hughey L, Richards CL. Locomotor rehabilitation in a complex virtual environment. Proc. IEEE EMBS, San Francisco, 2004.
42. Patton J, Dawe G, Scharver C, Mussa-Ivaldi F, Kenyon RV. Robotics and Virtual Reality: The development of a life-sized 3-D system for the rehabilitation of motor function. Proc. IEEE EMBS, 2004.
43. Keshner EA, Kenyon RV, Dhaher Y. Postural research and rehabilitation in an immersive virtual environment. Proc. IEEE EMBS, San Francisco, 2004.
44. Wolf SL, Binder-MacLeod SA. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1393-1403.
45. Inglis J, Donald MW, Monga TN, Sproul, M, Young MJ. Electromyographic biofeedback and physical therapy of the hemiplegic upper limb. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984;65:755-759.
46. Crow JL, Lincoln NB, Nouri FM, De Weerdt W. The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke. Int. Disabil. Studies. 1989;11:155-160.
47. Schleenbaker RE, Mainous AG. Electromyographic biofeedback for neuromuscular reeducation in the hemiplegic stroke patient: A metaanalysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1301-1304.
48. Lünenburger L, Colombo G, Riener R, and Dietz V. Biofeedback in gait training with the robotic orthosis Lokomat. In 26th Annual Inter Conf IEEE EMBS. San Francisco, CA, USA; 2004.
49. Riener, R., Lünenburger, L., Jezernik, S., Anderschitz, M., Colombo, G., Dietz, V. (2005) Cooperative subject-centered strategies for robotaided treadmill training: first experimental results. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 13, p. 380-393.