Transbuccal delivery of chlorpheniramine maleate from mucoadhesive buccal patches

Drug Delivery

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 185-191

  Sekhar, K Chandra ^a   Naidu, K V S ^b   Vishnu, Y Vamshi ^b   Gannu, Ramesh ^b   Kishan, V ^b   Rao, Y Madhusudan ^b  

^a MERCER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KAKATIYA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Buccal Absorption; Buccal Patches; Chlorpheniramine Maleate; Evaluation; Mechanical Properties; Mucoadhesion

Indexed keywords

CHLORPHENIRAMINE MALEATE; HYDROXYETHYLCELLULOSE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOAVAILABILITY; DRUG ABSORPTION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG SCREENING; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MOISTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADHESIVENESS; ADMINISTRATION, BUCCAL; ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADULT; ANIMALS; AREA UNDER CURVE; BIOLOGICAL AVAILABILITY; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; CELLULOSE; CHLORPHENIRAMINE; DRUG CARRIERS; HUMANS; MALE; MOUTH MUCOSA; POLYMERS; SWINE; TECHNOLOGY, PHARMACEUTICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 41549164865     PISSN: 10717544     EISSN: 15210464     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10717540801952639     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alur, H. H., Pather, S. I., Mitra, A. K., and Johnston, T. P. 1999. Transmucosal sustained-delivery of chlorpheniramine maleate in rabbits using a novel, natural mucoadhesive gum as an excipient in buccal tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 188:1-10.
2. Anders, R., and Merkle, H. P. 1989. Evaluation of laminated mucoadhesive patches for buccal drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 49:231-240.
3. Aulton, M. E., Abdul-Razzak, M. H., and Hogan, J. E. 1981. The mechanical properties of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose films derived from aqueous systems: the influence of solid inclusions. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 7:649-668.
4. Ceschel, G. C., Maffei, P., and Gentile, M. 1999. Design and evaluation of a new transdermal formulation containing chlorpheniramine maleate. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 25:1035-1039.
5. Choi, H., Jung, J., Yong, C. S., Rhee, C., Lee, M., Han, J., Park, K., and Kim, C. 2000. Formulation and in vivo evaluation of omeprazole buccal adhesive tablet. J. Contr. Rel. 68:405-412.
6. de Vries, M. E., Bodde, H. E., Verhoef, J. C., and Junginger, H. E. 1991. Developments in buccal drug delivery. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug. Car. Syst. 8:271-303.
7. He, P., Davis, S. S., and Illum, L. 1998. In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan microspheres. Int. J. Pharm. 166:75-88.
8. Huang, S. M., Athanikar, N. K., Sridhar, K., Huang, Y. C., and Chiou, W. L. 1982. Pharmacokinetics of chlorpheniramine after intravenous and oral administration in normal adults. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 22:359-365.
9. Ishida, M., Nambu, N., and Nagai, T. 1983. Highly viscous gel ointment containing carbopol for application to the oral mucosal. Chem Pharm Bull. 31:4561-4564.
10. Jafar, A., Ali, N., Djavad, F., Massoud, A, Mohammad, R. S. S., and Majid, S. 2004. Development and evaluation of buccoadhesive propranolol hydrochloride tablet formulations: effect of fillers. IL Farmaco 59:155-161
11. Koch, K. M., O'Connor-Semmes, R. L., Davis, I. M., and Yin, Y. 1998. Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of chlorpheniramine and the effect of ranitidine. J. Pharm. Sci. 87:1097-1100.
12. Kotzan, J. A., Vallner, J. J., Stewart, J. T., Brown, W. J., Viswanathan, C. T., Needham, T. E., Dighe, S. V., and Malinowski, R. 1982. Bioavailability of regular and controlled-release chlorpheniramine products. J. Pharm. Sci. 71:919-923.
13. Le Brun, P. P. H., Fox, P. L. A., de Vries, M. E., and Bodde, H. E. 1989. In vitro penetration of some β-adrenoreceptor blocking drugs through porcine buccal mucosa. Int. J. Pharm. 49:141-145.
14. Nafee, N. A., Ismail, F. A., Boraie, N. A., and Mortada, L. M. 2003. Mucoadhesive buccal patches of miconazole nitrate: in vitro/in vivo performance and effect of ageing. Int. J. Pharm. 264:1-14.
15. Owens, T. S., Dansereau, R. J., and Sakr A. 2005. Development and evaluation of extended release bioadhesive sodium fluoride tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 288:109-122.
16. Peh, K. K., and Wong, C. F. 1999. Polymeric films as vehicle for buccal delivery: swelling, mechanical, and bioadhesive properties. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2:53-61
17. Perioli, L., Ambrogi, V., Rubini, D., Giovagnoli, S., Ricci, M., Blasi, P., and Rossi, C. 2004. Novel mucoadhesive buccal formulation containing metronidazole for the treatment of periodontal disease. J. Contr. Rel. 95:521-533.
18. Schurmann, W., and Turner, P. 1978. A membrane model of the human oral mucosa as derived from buccal absorption performance and physicochemical properties of the β-blocking drugs atenolol and propranolol. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 30:137-147.
19. Senel, S., and Hincal, A. A. 2001. Drug penetration enhancement via buccal route: possibilities and limitations. J. Contr. Rel. 72:133-144.
20. Squier, C. A., and Hall, B. K. 1984. The permeability of mammalian nonkeratinized oral epithelia to horseradish peroxidase applied in vivo and in vitro. Arch. Oral Biol. 29:45-50.
21. Squier, C. A., and Hall, B. K. 1985. The permeability of skin and oral mucosa to water and horseradish peroxidase as related to the thickness of the permeability barrier. J. Invest. Dermatol. 84:176-179.
22. Tucker, I. G. 1988. A method to study the kinetics of oral mucosal drug absorption from solutions. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 40:679-683.
23. Vamshi Vishnu, Y., Chandrasekhar, K., Ramesh, G., and Madhusudan Rao, Y. 2007. Development of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of carvedilol. Curr. Drug Del. 4:27-39.
24. Wong, C. F., Yuen, K. H., and Peh, K. K. 1999. An in-vitro method for buccal adhesion studies: importance of instrument variables. Int. J. Pharm. 180:47-57.