Service contracts-An instrument of international logistics supply chain: Under United States and European Union regulatory frameworks

Marine Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 489-496

  Marlow, Peter ^a   Nair, Rawindaran ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

European Commission; European Union; Liner shipping; Regulations; Service contracts; United States Federal Maritime Commission

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN COMMISSION; EUROPEAN UNION; LOGISTICS; MARINE POLICY; MARITIME TRADE; SHIPPING; TARIFF STRUCTURE; TRADE FLOW;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 41549141228     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2007.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Review of maritime transport. Geneva: United Nations; 2005.
2. Marx Jr. D. International shipping cartels (1953), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
3. Gardner B.M. EU competition policy and liner shipping conferences. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 31 (1999) 317-324
4. Nair R. A study of economic regulation of liner shipping and its effect on structural change in the industry. Unpublished PhD thesis. Cardiff University; 2002.
5. Federal Maritime Commission. The impact of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (2001), Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC
6. Commission of the European Communities. Proposal for a Council Regulation repealing Regulation 4056/86 laying down detailed rules for the application of Articles 85 and 86 to maritime transport, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 as regards the extension of its scope to include cabotage and international tramp services. Brussels Official Journal 2005.
7. European Council Regulation (EC) No. 1419/2006. Brussels Official Journal of the European Union L 269/1 25 September 2006.
8. Advisory Commission on Conferences in Ocean Shipping (ACCOS), Report to the President and the Congress of the Advisory Commission on Conferences in Ocean Shipping, 1992.
9. Hardy J.D. Discussion on service contracts. In: Grifman P. (Ed). The Shipping Act of 1984: a debate of the issues (1988), Sea Grant Publication, University of Southern California
10. Federal Maritime Commission. Section 18. Report on the Liner Shipping Act 1984. Washington, DC: Federal Maritime Commission; 1989.
11. Hardy J.D. Discussion on service contracts. In: Grifman P. (Ed). The Shipping Act of 1984: a debate of the issues (1988), Sea Grant Publication, University of Southern California
12. Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998. Public Law 105-258, Washington, DC, 14 October 1998.
13. Weil RT. US Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998, OSRA: a step forward or away from an international consensus on the regulation of ocean liner shipping. In: Proceedings of the 1999 conference of the international association of maritime economists (Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada), 13 and 14 September 1999. Centre for International Business Studies, Dalhousie University, 1999.
14. Council Regulation 4056/86 laying down detailed rules for the application of Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty to Maritime Transport. Official Journal L.378; 31 December 1986.
15. Paixao A.C., and Marlow P.B. A review of the European Union shipping policy. Maritime Policy and Management 28 2 (2001) 187-198
16. Fitzgerald E. EC competition policy and liner shipping. Paper presented at the Transasia '99 conference, Hong Kong, 25-27 August 1999.
17. European Commission Decision of 16 September 1998 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 85 and 86 of the EC Treaty on case no. IV/35.134-Trans Atlantic conference agreement. Brussels: European Commission; 1998.
18. European Commission. The application of competition rules to liner shipping: final report. Global insight: in association with Institute of Shipping Economics and the Workgroup for Infrastructure Policy and Berlin University of Technology. Brussels, 2005.
19. European Commission Decision (EC) of 19 October 1994, OJ No. L 376 Case IV/34.446-Trans Atlantic Agreement, 31 December 1994.
20. Commission Notice concerning Case COMP/37.396 Revised Transatlantic Conference Agreement in OJ C335/12, 29 November 2001.
21. European Commission Decision of 16 September 1998 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 85 and 86 of the EC treaty on case no. IV/35.134-Trans Atlantic Conference Agreement.
22. European Commission. Official journal no. C335/03. Brussels, 29 November 2001.
23. Ryoo D.K., and Thanopoulou H.A. Liner alliances in the globalisation era: a strategic tool for Asian container carrier. Maritime Policy and Management 26 4 (1999) 349-367
24. Heaver T.D. The evolving roles of shipping lines in international logistics. International Journal of Maritime Economics 4 (2002) 210-230
25. Consortia Regulation has been extended for another 5 years until 25 April 2010 by notice issued in Brussels on 25 Aril 2005 (Reference IP/05/477 Date 25/04/2005).
26. Gardner B., Marlow P., and Nair R. The economic regulation of liner shipping: the impact of US and EU regulation in US trades. In: Grammenos C.Th. (Ed). The handbook of maritime economics and business (2002), Lloyd's of London Press, London
27. Ryoo DK. Co-operation forms and business strategies: the case of Korean liner shipping. Unpublished PhD thesis. Wales, 1999.
28. Gilman S. The size economies and network efficiency of large containerships. In: Haralambedes HE, editor. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 2000.
29. Ward R. The Maersk effort. Containerisation International 2006.
30. Lloyd's List Newspaper. 5 April 2006.
31. European Commission. Trans Atlantic Conference Agreement: Commission Decision Case IV/35 134. Brussels, 16 September 1998.
32. European Commission. The application of competition rules to liner shipping: final report: global insight. In association with Institute of Shipping Economics and the Workgroup for Infrastructure Policy and Berlin University of Technology. Brussels, 2005.
33. Heaver TD. Liner freight rates: principles, practices and prognosis. In: Proceedings of a conference organised by the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) and the University of Antwerp (UFSIA) in Antwerp, February 1994.