Best practices in shift turnovers: Implications for reducing aviation maintenance turnover errors as revealed in ASRS reports

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 72-85

  Parke, Bonny ^a   Kanki, Barbara G ^b  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41549137832     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508410701749464     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Boeing Commercial Aircraft Division. (2003). MEDA user's guide, updated 2003. Retrieved November 21, 2007, from http://www.hf.faa.gov/ hfmaint/Default.aspx?tabid=389
2. Bradley, W. B. (1991). Task force reduces stuck-pipe costs. Oil and Gas Journal, 89(21), 84-88.
3. Cloutier, E., & LaFlamme, L. (1994). Analysis of 94 occupational accidents which occurred in saw-mills between 1st Jan and 31st October 1993. Quebec, Canada: IRSSTQ, Quebec Occupational Health and Safety Research Institute.
4. Cullen, L. (1993). Inquiry into the Piper Alpha oil platform disaster, Vols. 1&2. London: HMSO. Volume 2, Chapter 5. Retrieved November 21, 2007, from http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/Pipervol2.html
5. Delia Rocco, P., Cruz, C., & Clemens, J. A. (1999). Operational errors/deviations and shift work in air traffic control (Tech. Rep. No. DOT/FAA/AM-99/2). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
6. Dobson, J. D. (1999). Rig floor accidents: Who, when, and why? In Proceedings of the 1999 SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Part 1 (of 2) (pp. 323-324). Dallas, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers and International Association of Drilling Contractors. Available on November 26, 2007 from http://www.Spe.org=elibrary-servlet=spepreview?id-00052798
7. Drury, C. G., Levine, C., & Reynolds, J. L. (1995). Human Factors Program Development and Implementation in W. T. Shepherd (Ed.) Phase IV Progress Report (pp. 224-258). Washington, D. C.: Office of Aviation Medicine. Retrieved on November 27, 2007 from http://www.hf.faa.gov/hfmaint/Portals/1/ FAA_AAM%20Year%20Reports_1995.pdf
8. Eiff, G., Lopp, D., Nejely, D., & Vice, M. (2001). Improving safety and productivity through a more effective maintenance shift turnover. Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana.
9. Federal Aviation Administration. (1991). Human factors in aviation maintenance: Phase I progress report (Tech. Rep. No. DOT/FAA/AAM-91/16). Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Medicine.
10. Federal Aviation Administration. (1993). Humanfactors in aviation maintenance: Phase III progress report (Tech. Rep. No. DOT/FAA/AAM-93/15). Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Medicine.
11. Federal Aviation Administration. (2000). Development of systems to facilitate shift change over aircraft maintenance. Current Activities in Aviation Maintenance Human Factors. Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Medicine.
12. Federal Aviation Authority. (2006). Air traffic control manual, Appendix D. 7110.65M (rev. 7/12/01). Washington, D.C.: Department of Transportation. Retrieved November 26,2007, from http://www2.hf.faa.gov/ workbenchtools/default.aspx?rPage=Tooldetails&subCatId=41&toolID=149
13. Godimu, P. (1977). Medical problems of shift work. Lille, France: Caisse Regionale d'assurance Maladie du Nord de la France.
14. Gramopadhye, A., & Kelkar, K., & Watson, J. (1999). Analysis of shift change in the aircraft maintenance environment: Findings and recommendations. In J. Watson, W. Johnson (Eds.) FAA, Aviation Maintenance Human. Factors Annual Reports FY 1999, Chapter 6 (pp. 98-147). Washington, D.C.: Office of Aviation Medicine. Retrieved on November 26, 2007 from http://www.hf.faa.gov/hfmaint/Portals/1/FAA%20Year%20Reports_1999.pdf
15. Grusenmeyer, C. (1992). The interest in the notion of shared functional representation between the operators in change of shift phase. In G. C. Van der Veer, N. J. Trauber, S. Bouquene, & N. Autrelonts (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 103-113). Bonn: Gesellschaft fur Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung.
16. Grusenmeyer, C (1995). Shared functional representation in cooperative tasks: The example of shift changeover. The International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 5, 163-176.
17. Hopkin, D. V. (1980). The measurement of the air traffic controller. Human Factors, 22(5), 547-560.
18. Kihlgrhen, M. (1992). The content of the oral daily reports at a long-term ward before and after staff training in integrity promoting care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, 6, 105-112.
19. Knapp, M. L. (1995). Essentials of nonverbal communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
20. Lardner, R. (1992). Do you know what I know? Afield study of shift handover in a safety-critical process industry. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
21. Lardner, R. (2000). Effective shift handover. In M. P. Cottam, D. W. Harvey, R. P. Pape, & J. Tait (Eds.), Proceedings of ESREL 2000, SaRS and SRA (pp. 413-422). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A. A. Balkema. Retrieved on November 26, 2007 from http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/otopdf/1996/oto96003.pdf
22. Leavitt, H. J., & Mueller, R. (1951). Some effects of feedback on communication. Human Relations, 4, 401-410.
23. Maddox, M. E. (1998). Shiftwork and scheduling. In Human factors guide for aviation maintenance. Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Medicine, Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved November 26, 2007 from http://www.hf.faa.gov/hfmaint/Default.aspx7tabid-195.
24. National Transportation Safety Board. (1992). Aircraft accident report of Continental Express flight #2574. (Tech. Rep. No. NTSB/AAR-92/04, PB92-910405, on September 11, 1991). Retrieved November 26, 2007, from http://amelia.db.erau.edu-reports-ntsb-ntsb-aar-AAR92-04.pdf
25. Parke, B. (2002). Best practices in shift handover: Applications to Mars exploration Rover surface operations (Report submitted to NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
26. Parke, B., & Mishkin, A. (2005). Best practices in shift handover communication: Mars exploration Rover surface operations. In Proceedings of the International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety Conference. Nice, France. Noordwijk, The Netherlands: European. Space Agency Publications.
27. Patterson, E. S., & Woods, D. D. (200.1). Shift changes, updates, and the on-call architecture in space shuttle mission control. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10, 317-346.
28. Rankin, W. L. (2000). The maintenance error decision aid (MEDA) process. Proceedings of the IEA. 2000/Human Factor Ergonomie Society 2000 Congress, 3, 795-798.
29. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
30. Stager, P., & Hameluck, D. (1988). Factors associated with air traffic control operating irregularities: An analysis of fact finding board reports (Tech. Rep. No. TP 9342E). Ottawa, Canada: Transport Canada.
31. Taylor, J. C., & Thomas, R. L., III. (2001). Written communication practices as impacted by a maintenance resource management training intervention (Report submitted to NASA on NASA Award #NCC2-1156). Santa Clara, CA: Santa Clara University.
32. United Kingdom Department of Health and Safety Executive. (2000). National inspection project, Health and Safety Executive, Offshore Safety Division. Retrieved November 26, 2007, from http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/ index.htm
33. U.S. Department of Energy. (1998). DOE standard: Guide to good practices for operations turnover (Tech. Rep. No. DOE-STD-1038-93, updated December 1998). Washington, DC: Author.
34. Vandenbosch, T. M. ( 1986). Tailoring care plans to nursing diagnoses. American Journal of Nursing, 3, 312-314.
35. Werner, E. (1979). Working hours and accidents. Dortmund, Germany: Bundesanstalt fur Arbeitsschutz und Unfallforschung.
36. Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 3-21.
37. Zacks, J., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(1), 29-58.