The ritual environment of the mental health tribunal hearing: Inquiries and reflections

Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 91-96

  Tait, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41549105638     PISSN: 13218719     EISSN: 19341687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1375/pplt.2003.10.1.91     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Belcher, G. (2002). Therapeutic justice: Our commitment process could stand a second look. Vermont Bar Journal, 28, 48–50.
2. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Carney, T., ‖ Tait, D. (1997). The adult guardianship experiment: Tribunals and popular justice. Sydney: Federation Press.
4. Clark, M.D. (in press). A change-focused approach for judges. In B.J. Winick ‖ D.B. Wexler (Eds.), Judging in a therapeutic key: Therapeutic jurisprudence and the courts. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
5. Cascardi, M., Hall, A., ‖ Poythress, N.G. (2000). Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: An analogue study. Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 18, 731–740.
6. Costello, J.C. (1999). Representation of children: Representing children in mental disability. Proceedings Journal of the Center for Children ‖ the Courts, 101–120
7. Ferencz, N., ‖ McGuire J. (2000). Mental health review tribunals in the UK: Applying a therapeutic jurisprudence perspective. Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, 37(1), 48–52.
8. Garapon, A. (1997). Bien juger: Essai sur le rituel judiciaire. Paris: Odile Jacob.
9. Goffman, E. (1961a). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday.
10. Goffman, E. (1961b). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
11. Greer, A., O’Regan, M., Traverso, A. (1996). Therapeutic jurisprudence and patient’s perceptions of procedural due process of civil commitment hearings. In D. Wexler, B. Winick, ‖ N.C. Durham (Eds.), Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 923–933). Carolina Academic Press.
12. Perlin, M.N., (1990). Unpacking the myths: The symbolism mythology of insanity defense jurisprudence. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 40, 599–731.
13. Paradine, K., (Spring, 2000). The importance of understanding love and other feelings in survivors’ experiences of domestic violence. American Judges’ Association Court Review, 37, 40–47.
14. Peay, J. (1989). Tribunals on trial: A study of decisionmaking under the Mental Health Act 1983. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15. Petrucci, C. J. (2002). Respect as a component in the judge-defendant interaction in a specialized domestic violence court that utilizes therapeutic jurisprudence. Criminal Law Bulletin, 38(2), 263–295.
16. Schmidt, W.C., (2002). The wingspan of Wingspread: What is known and not known about the state of the guardianship and public guardianship system thirteen years after the Wingspread National Guardianship Symposium. Stetson Law Review, 31, 1027–1045.
17. Slobogin, C. (1995). Therapeutic jurisprudence: Five dilemmas to ponder. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1, 193–219.
18. Syderman, S.J., Cascardi, N.G, ‖ Ritterband, L.M. (1997). Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: A Critique of Tyler’s Analysis. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 207–221.
19. Tait, D. (2001). Popular sovereignty and the justice process: Towards a comparative methodology for observing courtroom rituals. Contemporary Justice Review, 4(2), 201–218.
20. Tyler, T. (1992). The psychological consequences of judicial procedures: Implications for civil commitment hearings. Southern Methodist University Law Review, 46, 433–445.
21. Vittoria, A. (1992). The elderly guardianship hearing: A socio-legal encounter’ Journal of Aging Studies, 6, 165–190.
22. Weijers I., ‖ Duff, A. (2002). Punishing juveniles. Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing
23. Wexler, D. (1992). Justice, mental health, and therapeutic jurisprudence. Cleveland State Law Review, 40, 517–526.
24. Wexler, D.B. ‖ B.J. Winick (Eds.). (1996). Law in a Therapeutic Key. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
25. Winick, B. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil commitment hearing. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 10, 37–60.
26. Winick, B.J. (1997). Coercion and mental health treatment. Denver University Law Review, 74, 1145–1168.
27. Winick, B.J. (1996). The MacArthur Treatment Competency Study: Legal and therapeutic implications, Psychology Public Policy and Law, 2, 137–166.