Soil suspension/dispersion modeling methods for estimating health-based soil cleanup levels of hexavalent chromium at chromite ore processing residue sites

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 384-403

  Scott, Paul K ^a   Proctor, Deborah ^b  

^a CARDNO CHEMRISK   (United States)

^b EXPONENT INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; CHROMIUM ORE TREATMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARDS; STREET TRAFFIC CONTROL;

CHROMITE ORE PROCESSING; HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM; RESIDUE SITES; VEHICLE TRAFFIC;

SOILS;

CHROMIUM;

ARTICLE; DISPERSION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; MINING; MODEL; PARTICULATE MATTER; POLLUTION TRANSPORT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOIL EROSION; SOIL POLLUTION; WIND;

EID: 41549100949     PISSN: 10962247     EISSN: 21622906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3155/1047-3289.58.3.384     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Scott, P.K.; Finley, B.L.; Sung, H.M.; Schulze, R.H.; Turner, D.B. Identification of an Accurate Soil Suspension/Dispersion Modeling Method for Use in Estimating Health-Based Soil Cleanup Levels of Hexavalent Chromium in Chromite Ore Processing Residues; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 47, 753-765.
2. Unpaved Roads, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, 5th Edition; Section 13.2.2.; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Seattle WA, 1995.
3. User's Guide for the Fugitive Dust Model (FDM), User Instructions; EPA-910/9-88-202R; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Seattle WA, 1991.
4. Unpaved Roads, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, 5th ed.; Section 13.2.2.; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Seattle, WA, 2006.
5. Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised), Suppl C. Fed. Regist. 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix W, Final Rule, 2005; 68218-68261.
6. Inhalation Exposure Pathway Soil Remediation Standards-Basis and Background; Soil Remediation Standards. Rule Proposal: Remediation Standards; N.J.A.C. 7:26D and Technical Requirements for Site Remediation, N.J.A.C. 7:26E-1.3(d), 1.13. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection: Trenton, NJ, 2007; available at http://www.state.nj.us/dep/srp/regs/srs/ bb_inhalation.pdf (accessed August 2007).
7. Unpaved Roads, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, 5th ed.; Section 13.2.2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Seattle, WA, 1998.
8. User's Guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) Dispersion Models; EPA-454/B-95-003a; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1995.
9. Cowherd, D; Englehart, P.J.; Muleski, G.E.; Kinsey, J.S. Hazardous Waste TSDF Fugitive Particulate Matter Air Emissions Guidance Document; EPA-450/3-89-019; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1989.
10. Cowherd, D.; Muleski, G.E.; Englehart, P.J.; Gillette, D.A. Rapid Assessment of Exposure to Particulate Emissions from Surface Contaminated Sites; EPA/600-8-85/002; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Health and Environmental Assessment: Washington, DC, 1985.
11. Soil Screening Guidance: User's Guide; Publication 9355.4-23; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, DC, 1996.
12. Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites; Publication 9355.4-24; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, DC, 2002.
13. Pleim, J.; Venkatram, A.; Yamartino, R. ADOM/TADAP Model Development Program, the Dry Deposition Module; ERT document P-B980-520; Prepared for Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Applied Engineering and Science, Canada by ERT, Inc., Concord, MA, 1984.
14. Development and Testing of Dry Deposition Algorithms; EPA-454/R-94-015; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality, Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1994.
15. User's Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model-AERMOD; EPA/454/B-03-001; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2004.
16. Hall, D.J.; Spanton, A.M.; Dunkerley, F.; Bennett, M.; Griffiths, R.F. An Inter-Comparison of the AERMOD, ADMS, and ISC Dispersion Models for Regulatory Applications; Technical Report P362; U.K. Environment Agency R&D Dissemination Centre: Swindon, UK, 1999.
17. Peters, W.D.; Wilson, R.B.; Cimorelli, A.J.; Perry, S.G.; Weil, J.C.; Venkatram, A. Comparison of Regulatory Design Concentrations: AERMOD Versus ISCST3 and CTDMPLUS; available at http://www.epa.gov/scram001/7thconf/ aermod/conseq.pdf (accessed 2007)
18. Hanna, S.R.; Egan, B.A.; Purdum, J.; Wagler, J. Evaluation of the ADMS, AERMOD, and ISC3 Dispersion Models with the OPTEX, Duke Forest, Kincaid, Indianapolis, and Lovett Field Data Sets; Intl. J. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 16, 310-314.
19. Liebsch, E.; Grimm, E. Comparison of ISCST3 and AERMOD Results for Fugitive Dust Sources. In Proceedings of the Air & Waste Management Association 98th Annual Conference and Exhibition, Minneapolis, MN, 2005; p 625.
20. Kitsa, V.; Lioy, P.J.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Shupack, S.; Howell, T.; Sanders, P. Particle Size Distribution of Chromium: Total and Hexavalent Chromium in Inspirable, Thoracic, and Respirable Soil Particles from Contaminated Sites in New Jersey; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1992, 17, 213-229.
21. 1990 Air Quality Report; New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection; Division of Environmental Quality: Trenton, NJ, 1991.
22. 1991 Air Quality Report; New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection; Division of Environmental Quality: Trenton, NJ, 1992.
23. Scott, P.K.; Finley, B.L.; Harris, M.A.; Rabbe, D.E. Background Air Concentrations of Cr(VI) in Hudson County, New Jersey: Implications for Setting Health-Based Standards for Cr(VI) in Soil; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 47, 592-600.
24. Protocol for Determining the Best Performing Model; EPA-454/R-92-025; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1992.
25. Neter, J.; Wasserman, W.; Kutner, M.H. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 3rd Ed., Irwin: Burr Ridge, IL, 1990.
26. Muleski, G. Revisions to AP-42 Section 13.2.2, 'Unpaved Roads,' EPA Contract 68-D-1-002, Work Assignment No. 1-03, MRI Project No. 110130.1.003; Memorandum to B. Kuykendal, September 27, 2001.
27. Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources, Revised; EPA-454/R-92-019; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1992.
28. Falerios, M.; Schild, K.; Sheehan, P.; Paustenbach, D.J. Airborne Concentrations of Trivalent and Hexavalent Chromium from Contaminated Soils at Unpaved and Partially Paved Commercial/Industrial Sites; Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1992, 42, 40-48.
29. Emission Factor Documentation for AP-42, Section 13.2.2, Unpaved Roads, Final Report; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Washington, DC, 1998.