Identification of an Accurate Soil Suspension/Dispersion Modeling Method for Use in Estimating Health-Based Soil Cleanup Levels of Hexavalent Chromium in Chromite Ore Processing Residues

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 753-765

  Scott, Paul K ^a   Finley, Brent L ^a   Sung, Hung Ming ^b   Schulze, Richard H ^b   Turner, D Bruce ^b  

^a ChemRisk Div of McLaren Hart   (United States)

^b TRINITY CONSULTANTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; CHROMIUM ORE TREATMENT; DUST; HEALTH HAZARDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; SODIUM COMPOUNDS; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS);

CHROMITE ORE PROCESSING RESIDUES (COPR); FUGITIVE DUST MODEL (FDM); TETRASODIUM PYROPHOSPHATE;

SOIL POLLUTION;

CHROMIUM;

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DISPERSION; EMULSION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METAL INDUSTRY; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOIL POLLUTION; THEORY;

EID: 0031193730     PISSN: 10962247     EISSN: 21622906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.1997.10463940     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. “Integrated Risk Information Service [IRIS],” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, 1994.
2. Falerios, M.; Schild, K.; Sheehan, P.; Paustenbach, D.J. “Airborne concentrations of trivalent and hexavalent chromium from contaminated soils at unpaved and partially paved commercial/industrial sites,” Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1992, 42, 40-48.
3. Sheehan, P.J.; Ricks R.; Ripple S.; Paustenbach, D.J. “Field evaluation of a sampling and analytical method for environmental levels of airborne hexavalent chromium,” Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1992, 53, 57-68.
4. Finley, B.; Fehling, K.; Falerios, M.; Paustenbach, D. “Field validation for sampling and analysis of airborne hexavalent chromium,” Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 1993, 8, 191-200.
5. Environmental Science and Engineering (ESE). “Remedial Investigation for Chromium Sites in Hudson County New Jersey,” Prepared for the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, NJ, 1989.
6. Cowherd, D.; Muleski, G.E.; Englehart, P.J.; Gillette, D.A. “Rapid Assessment of Exposure to Particulate Emissions from Surface Contamination Sites,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, 1985; EPA/600-8-85/002.
7. User’s Guide: Emission Control Technologies and Emission Factors for Unpaved Road Fugitive Emissions; U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory, 1987; EPA/625/5-87/022.
8. Cowherd, D.; Englehart, P.J. “Size Specific Particulate Emission Factors for Industrial and Rural Roads; Source Category Report,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1985; EPA/600/7-85/051.
9. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Fifth Edition; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 1995.
10. Cowherd, D.; Englehart, P.J.; Muleski, G.E.; Kinsey, J.S. “Hazardous Waste TSDF Fugitive Particulate Matter Air Emissions Guidance Document,” U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 1989; EPA-450/3-89-019.
11. Scott, P.K.; Harris, M.A.; Rabbe, D.E.; Finley, B.L. “Background air concentrations of Cr(VI) in Hudson County, New Jersey: implications for setting health-based standards for Cr(VI) in Soil,” J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 4, 592-600.
12. “Cleanup Standards for Contaminated Sites, Proposed New Rule,” New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 1992; N.J.A.C. 7:26D.
13. User’s Guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) Dispersion Models; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, 1995; EPA-454/B-95-003a.
14. User’s Guide for the Fugitive Dust Model (FDM), User Instructions; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Seattle, WA, 1991; EPA-910/9-88-202R.
15. Fed. Reg. “Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised), Supplement C, 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix W,” Final Rule, August 9, 1995; 40465-40474.
16. “Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algorithm for the Industrial Source Complex Short-Term Model and Wind Tunnel Data,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1992.
17. “Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dispersion Algorithms for Emission Sources at Superfund Sites,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1989; EPA-450/4-89/020.
18. “Evaluation of Area and Volume Source Dispersion Models for Petroleum and Chemical Industry Facilities, Phase I” (Final Report), American Petroleum Institute, 1992; API Publication No. 4539.
19. “Area and Volume Source Air Quality Model Performance Evaluation, Phase II” (Final Report), American Petroleum Institute, 1992; API Publication No. 4540.
20. Winges, K.D.; Gombar, F.J. “Fugitive Dust Model (FDM) First Validation Study,” prepared for Region 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Seattle, Washington, 1990.
21. Winges, K.D.; Gombar, F.J. “Fugitive Dust Model (FDM) Second Validation Study,” prepared for Region 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Seattle, Washington, 1990.
22. Winges, K.D. “Fugitive Dust Model (FDM) Third Validation Study,” prepared for Region 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Seattle, Washington, 1990.
23. Fed. Reg. “Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste; Dye and Pigment Industries; Hazardous Waste Listing Determination Policy; and CERCLA Hazardous Substance Designation and Reportable Quantities; Proposed Rules, 40 CFR Parts 261, 271, and 30,” December 22, 1994; 66072-6614.
24. Fed. Reg. “Standards for the Management and Use of Slag Residues Derived from HTMR Treatment of K061, K062, and F006 Wastes,” December 29, 1994; 67256-67465.
25. “Superfund Record of Decision: Hanford 1100-Area, WA,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 1993.
26. “Superfund Record of Decision: Bunker Hill Mining & Metallurgical Complex, ID,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 1992.
27. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, Physical and Chemical Methods. Volume IA-C. Laboratory Manual. Volume II. Field Sampling. SW 846 (Third Edition) Final Update #1. Method 6010; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, D.C., 1986.
28. Kitsa, V.; Lioy, P.J.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Shupack, S.; Howell, T.; Sanders, P. “Particle size distribution of chromium: total and hexavalent chromium in inspirable, thoracic and respirable soil particles from contaminated sites in New Jersey,” Aerosol Science and Technology, 1992, 17, 213-229.
29. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, Physical and Chemical Methods. Volume IA-C. Laboratory Manual. Volume II. Field Sampling. SW 846 (Third Ed.) Final Update #1. Method 3060A (proposed); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, D.C., 1986.
30. “National Weather Service Surface Station Meteorological Data for Newark, NJ and Upper Air Station Meteorological Data for Atlantic City, NJ,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 1995.
31. “1990 Air Quality Report,” New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Environmental Quality, July 1991.
32. “Protocol for Determining the Best Performing Model,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1992; EPA-454/R-92-025.
33. “Supplemental Guidance Standard Default Exposure Factors,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Toxics Integration Branch: Washington, D.C., 1991.