Dependence of friction on roughness, velocity, and temperature

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2008, Pages

  Sang, Yi ^a   Dubé, Martin ^b   Grant, Martin ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À TROIS RIVIÈRES   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELASTIC MODULI; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION; VELOCITY;

ATOMIC-SCALE FRICTION; FRICTION COEFFICIENT;

FRICTION;

EID: 41549099592     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.036123     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. E. Meyer, R. M. Overney, K. Dransfeld, and T. Gyalog, Nanoscience: Friction and Rheology on the Nanometer Scale (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
2. F. Heslot, T. Baumberger, B. Perrin, B. Caroli, and C. Caroli, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.49.4973 49, 4973 (1994)
3. C. Caroli and B. Velicki, J. Phys. I JPGCE8 1155-4304 10.1051/jp1:1997137 7, 1391 (1997).
4. J. A. Greenwood and J. B. P. Williamson, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A PRLAAZ 0950-1207 10.1098/rspa.1966.0242 295, 300 (1966). They find that the behavior of the normal load as a function of the contact area is almost constant. They nevertheless do find some power-law-like behavior (with effective exponent of 0.9) in the electrical resistivity. We expect the latter is not an asymptotic power law, but rather a slow crossover to linear behavior.
5. B. J. Persson, Sliding Friction (Springer, Berlin, 1998).
6. Handbook of Micro/Nanotribology, edited by, B. Bhushan, (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999).
7. B. N. J. Persson, O. Albohr, F. Mancosu, V. Peveri, V. N. Samoilov, and I. M. Sivebaek, Wear WEARCJ 0043-1648 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00234-5 254, 835 (2003).
8. C. M. Mate, G. M. McClelland, R. Erlandsson, and S. Chiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1942 59, 1942 (1987).
9. E. Gnecco, R. Bennewitz, T. Gyalog, Ch. Loppacher, M. Bammerlin, E. Meyer, and H.-J. Guntherodt, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1172 84, 1172 (2000).
10. E. Riedo, E. Gnecco, R. Bennewitz, E. Meyer, and H. Brune, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.084502 91, 084502 (2003).
11. S. Maier, Y. Sang, T. Filleter, M. Grant, R. Bennewitz, E. Gnecco, and E. Meyer, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.245418 72, 245418 (2005).
12. A. Schirmeisen, D. Weiner, and H. Fuchs, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.136101 97, 136101 (2006).
13. M. Evstigneev, A. Schirmeisen, L. Jansen, H. Fuchs, and P. Reimann, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.240601 97, 240601 (2006).
14. B. Luan and M. O. Robbins, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.026111 74, 026111 (2006).
15. S. Roux, J. Schmittbuhl, J. P. Vilotte, and A. Hansen, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/23/4/007 23, 277 (1993).
16. B. N. J. Persson, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1388626 115, 3840 (2001).
17. B. N. J. Persson, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 87.116101 87, 116101 (2001).
18. G. G. Batrouni, A. Hansen, and J. Schmittbuhl, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2002-00368-1 60, 724 (2002).
19. S. Hyun, L. Pei, J.-F. Molinari, and M. O. Robbins, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.026117 70, 026117 (2004).
20. S. Hyun and M. O. Robbins, Tribol. Int. TRBIBK 0301-679X 40, 1413 (2007).
21. C. Campana, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.155419 75, 155419 (2007).
22. C. Campana and M. H. Muser, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/77/38005 77, 38005 (2007).
23. J. A. Greenwood and J. J. Wu, Meccanica MECCB9 0025-6455 10.1023/A:1016340601964 36, 617 (2001).
24. S. Ganti and B. Bhushan, Wear WEARCJ 0043-1648 10.1016/0043-1648(94) 06545-4 180, 17 (1995).
25. A. Majumdar and B. Bhushan, J. Tribol. JOTRE9 0742-4787. 113, 1 (1991).
26. P. J. Mangin, M. C. Béland, and L. M. Cormier, in Products of Papermaking, edited by, C. F. Barker, Transactions of the 10th Fundamental Research Symposium, Oxford, England (Pira International, Leatherhead, 1993), p. 1397.
27. F. Drolet and T. Uesaka, in Advances in Paper Science and Technology, edited by, J. L'Anson, Transactions of the 13th Fundamental Research Symposium (Bury, United Kingdom, 2005), Vol. 2, p. 1139-1154.
28. S. Morita, S. Fujisawa, and Y. Sugawara, Surf. Sci. Rep. SSREDI 0167-5729 10.1016/0167-5729(95)00007-0 23, 1 (1996).
29. T. Bouhacina, J. P. Aime, S. Gauthier, D. Michel, and V. Heroguez, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.7694 56, 7694 (1997).
30. G. A. Tomlinson, Philos. Mag. 7, 905 (1929). 1478-6435
31. D. Tomanek, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/15/8/014 15, 887 (1991)
32. T. Gyalog, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/31/5-6/004 31, 269 (1995)
33. T. Gyalog and H. Thomas, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter ZPCMDN 0722-3277 10.1007/s002570050506 104, 669 (1997).
34. H. Hölscher, U. D. Schwarz, and R. Wiesendanger, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i1996-00181-4 36, 19 (1996)
35. H. Hölscher, U. D. Schwarz, and R. Wiesendanger, Surf. Sci. SUSCAS 0039-6028 10.1016/S0039-6028(96)01285-X 375, 395 (1997)
36. O. Zwörner, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. APAMFC 0947-8396 10.1007/s003390051142 66, S263 (1998).
37. M. H. Muser, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89. 224301 89, 224301 (2002).
38. J. D. Gunton and M. C. Yalabik, Phys. Rev. B PLRBAQ 0556-2805 10.1103/PhysRevB.18.6199 18, 6199 (1978).
39. C. Unger and W. Klein, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.29. 2698 29, 2698 (1984).
40. J. Kurkijarvi, Phys. Rev. B PLRBAQ 0556-2805 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.832 6, 832 (1972).
41. L. D. Jackel, W. W. Webb, J. E. Lukens, and S. S. Lei, Phys. Rev. B PLRBAQ 0556-2805 10.1103/PhysRevB.9.115 9, 115 (1974).
42. A. Garg, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.15592 51, 15592 (1995).
43. D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.1396 31, 1396 (1985).
44. Y. Sang, M. Dube, and M. Grant, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.174301 87, 174301 (2001).
45. O. K. Dudko, A. E. Filippov, J. Kalfter, and M. Urbakh, Chem. Phys. Lett. CHPLBC 0009-2614 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)01469-5 352, 499 (2002).
46. A. L. Barab'asi and H. E. Stanley, Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1995).
47. The length lδ can be obtained from a microscopic model of roughness; see e.g., J. Krug, Adv. Phys. ADPHAH 0001-8732 10.1080/ 00018739700101498 46, 139 (1997).
48. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity (Pergamon, Oxford, 1970).
49. R. Kant, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.5749 53, 5749 (1996).
50. H. J. Hertz, J. Reine Angew. Math. 92, 156 (1881).
51. K. L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1985).
52. In principle, the combined product of density and curvature should be averaged over the fluctuations of the surface: 2 hθ (z-h). A separate average is appropriate since each quantity depends on different regions of the frequency of fluctuations. The curvature is dominated by the large-wavelength part of the spectrum while the density is dominated by the low-wavelength components. Again, it is straightforward to show this for a Gaussian interface.
53. The neglect of the y coordinate has no influence on the results presented in this paper.
54. P. Hanggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkocev, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.62.251 62, 251 (1990).
55. A. Buldum and S. Ciraci, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.2606 55, 2606 (1997).
56. Note that, at very low velocities, thermally activated events can occur before the spinodal limit considered here. However, this corresponds to velocities below 1 nm/sec, well below the experimental range.
57. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulations of Liquids (Clarendon, Oxford, 1990).
58. D. Forster, Hydrodynamic Fluctuations, Broken Symmetry and Correlation Functions (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1983).
59. A detailed analysis shows that the dissipation coefficient γ may itself depend on the position of the atoms. This effect is neglected here. See, e.g., L. N. Kantorovich, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.64. 245409 64, 245409 (2001).
60. P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, Principles of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1995).