Neonatal hearing screening - Transient-evoked oto-acoustic emission compared to automatic auditory brainstem response;Neonatal hørescreening: En sammenligning af automatisk hjernestammeaudiometri og otoakustiske emissioner

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 170, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 642-646

  Pedersen, Louise ^a,b   Møller, Troels Reinholdt ^a   Wetke, Randi ^a   Ovesen, Therese ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INFANT; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; UNILATERAL HEARING LOSS;

AUDIOMETRY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HEARING LOSS; HEARING LOSS, UNILATERAL; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; NEONATAL SCREENING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 41449110572     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Sundhedsstyrelsens retningslinier af 12. august 2004 for neonatal høre-screening. www.sst.dk/publ/ Publ2004/ Retningslinier_neonatal_hoerescreening.pdf/ jun 2006.
2. Parving A, Hauch A, Christensen B. Høretab hos børn - epidemiologi, identification og årsag gennem 30 år. Ugeskr Læger 2003;165:574-9.
3. Lin H, Shu M, Lee K et al. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1957-62.
4. Vohr B, Oh W, Stewart E et al. Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols. J Pediatr 2001;139:238-44.
5. Delb W, Merkel D, Pilorget K et al. Effectiveness of a TEOAE-based screening program. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004;261:191-6.
6. Norton S, Gorga M, Widen J et al. Identification of neonatal hearing impairmant: summary and recommendations. Ear Hearing 2000;21:529-35.
7. Clarke P, Iqbal M, Mitchell S. A comparison of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses for pre-discharge neonatal hear-ing screening. Int J Audiol 2003;42:443-7.
8. Iwasaki S, Hayashi Y, Seki A et al. A model of two-stage newborn hearing screening with automated auditory brainstem response. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:109-1104.
9. Meier S, Narabayashi O, Probst R et al. Comparison of currently available devices dsigned for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements. Int J Pediatr Otorhino-laryngol 2004;68:927-34.
10. Doyle K, Fujikawa S, Rogers P et al. Comparison of newborn hearing screen-ing by transient otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response using ALGO-2. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1998;43:207-11.
11. Elberling C. Neonatal hørescreening. Videncenter for døvblevne, døve og hørehæmmede. 2005. www.vcddh.dk/publikationer/#neonatal_hoerescreening/ jun 2006.
12. Brodal P. Sentral-nervesystemet. 3. udgave. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget AS, 2001: 285.
13. www.blsc.com/ jun 2006.
14. Rance G. Auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony and its perceptual consequences. Trends In Amplification 2005;9:1-43.
15. Dort J, Tobolski C, Brown D. Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: which test is best? J Otolaryngol 2000;29:206-10.