메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 206-210

Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: Which test is best?

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem responses; Hearing screening; Otoacoustic emissions; Universal hearing screening

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEWBORN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCREENING TEST;

EID: 0033774098     PISSN: 03816605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (28)

References (23)
  • 1
    • 0027565992 scopus 로고
    • Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children
    • (1993) NIH Consens Statement , vol.11 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-24
  • 15
    • 0023392748 scopus 로고
    • Hearing loss screening in the neonatal intensive care unit: Auditory brain stem response versus Crib-O-Gram; a cost-effectiveness analysis
    • (1987) Ear Hear , vol.8 , pp. 213-216
    • Prager, D.A.1    Stone, D.A.2    Rose, D.N.3
  • 16
    • 0019815820 scopus 로고
    • Freedom from ototoxicity in aminoglycoside treated neonates: A mistaken notion
    • (1981) Laryngoscope , vol.91 , pp. 1985-1994
    • Bernard, P.A.1
  • 19


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.