|
Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 206-210
|
Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: Which test is best?
|
Author keywords
Auditory brainstem responses; Hearing screening; Otoacoustic emissions; Universal hearing screening
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CALCULATION;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;
EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE;
EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;
FEMALE;
HEARING LOSS;
HIGH RISK POPULATION;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
NEWBORN;
PREDICTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SCREENING TEST;
CANADA;
CATCHMENT AREA (HEALTH);
COCHLEA;
COHORT STUDIES;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM;
FEASIBILITY STUDIES;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE COSTS;
HEARING DISORDERS;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
MALE;
NEONATAL SCREENING;
OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 0033774098
PISSN: 03816605
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (28)
|
References (23)
|