Selection of lineup foils in operational contexts

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 159-169

  Darling, Stephen ^a,c   Valentine, Tim ^a   Memon, Amina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TASK; OFFENDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; UNITED KINGDOM; VIDEORECORDING; WITNESS;

EID: 41449089443     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1366     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Clark, S. E. (2003). A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 629-654. DOI: 10.1002/acp.891
2. Clark, S. E., & Tunnicliff, J. L. (2001). Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification experiments: Experimental control and real-world simulation. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 199-216. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010753809988
3. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
4. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (in press). A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods.
5. Juslin, P., Olsson, N., & Winman, A. (1996). Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1304-1316.
6. Lindsay, R. C. L., Lea, J. A., & Fulford, J. A. (1991). Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 741-745.
7. Lindsay, R. C. L., Martin, R., & Webber, L. (1994). Default values in eyewitness descriptions: A problem for the match-to-description lineup foil selection strategy. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 527-541. DOI: 10.1007/BF01499172
8. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identification from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 343-350.
9. Luus, C. A. E., & Wells, G. L. (1991). Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 43-57. DOI: 10.1007/BF01044829
10. Navon, D. (1992). Selection of lineup foils by similarity to suspect is likely to misfire. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 575-593. DOI: 10.1007/BF01044624
11. Police and Criminal Evidence Act. (1984). Codes of practice (2005) http://police.homeoffice.gov.uk/operational-policing/powers-pace-codes/ pace-codes.html [19/1/2006].
12. Technical Working Group on Eyewitness Evidence. (1999). Eyewitness Evidence: A Guide to for law enforcement. Washington DC: US Department of Justice http://www.ncjrs.org/nij/eyewitness/tech_working_group.html [20/1/2005].
13. Tunnicliff, J. L., & Clark, S. E. (2000). Selecting foils for identification lineups: Matching suspects or descriptions. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 231-258. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005463020252
14. Valentine, T., & Heaton, P. (1999). An evaluation of the fairness of police lineups and video identifications. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S59-S72.
15. Valentine, T., Darling, S., & Memon, A. (in press). Do strict rules and moving images increase the reliability of sequential identification procedures. Applied Cognitive Psychology. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1306
16. Valentine, T., Harris, N., Colom Piera, A., & Darling, S. (2003). Are police video identifications fair to African: Caribbean suspects? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 459-476. DOI: 10.1002/acp.880
17. Wells, G. L., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1980). On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness non-identifications. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 776-784.
18. Wells, G. L., Rydell, S. M., & Seelau, E. P. (1993). The selection of distractors for eyewitness lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 835-L 844.
19. Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025750605807
20. Wright, D. B., & McDaid, A. T. (1996). Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 75-84.