Modeling a version of the good-genes hypothesis: Female choice of locally adapted males

Organisms Diversity and Evolution

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 157-163

  Reinhold, Klaus ^a  

^a Inst Evolutionsbiologie Okologie   (Germany)

Author keywords

Female choice; Good genes hypothesis; Local adaptation; Maintenance of genetic variation; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MATE CHOICE;

EID: 4143150778     PISSN: 14396092     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ode.2003.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Andersson M. Sexual Selection. 1994;Princeton University Press, Princeton
2. Arnqvist G., Nilsson T. The evolution of polyandry multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60:2000;145-164
3. Bensch S., Hasselquist D., Nielsen B., Hansson B. Higher fitness for philopatric than for immigrant males in a semi-isolated population of great reed warblers. Evolution. 52:1998;877-883
4. Charlesworth B. The heritability of fitness. Bradbury J.W., Andersson M.B. Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. 1987;21-44 Wiley, Chichester, UK
5. Clark D.C., DeBano S.J., Moore A.J. The influence of environmental quality on sexual selection in Nauphoeta cinerea (Dictyoptera: Blaberiidae). Behav. Ecol. 8:1997;46-53
6. Day T. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences spatial effects. Evolution. 54:2000;715-730
7. De Kogel C.H., Prijs H.J. Effects of brood size manipulations on sexual attractiveness of offspring in the zebra finch. Anim. Behav. 51:1996;699-708
8. Dodd D.M.B. Reproductive isolation as a consequence of adaptive divergence in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution. 43:1989;1308-1311
9. Doebeli M., Dieckmann U. Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature. 421:2003;259-264
10. Droney D.C. Environmental influences on male courtship and implications for female choice in a lekking Hawaiian Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 51:1996;821-830
11. Ehrman L., White M.M., Wallace B. A long-term study involving Drosophila melanogaster and toxic media. Evol. Biol. 25:1991;175-209
12. Fisher R.A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. 1930;Clarendon Press, Oxford
13. Foster S.A. The geography of behaviour an evolutionary perspective. Trends Evol. Ecol. 14:1999;190-195
14. Griffith S.C., Owens I.P.F., Burke T. Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait. Nature. 400:1999;358-359
15. Hamilton W.D., Zuk M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds a role for parasites? Science. 218:1982;384-387
16. Heisler I.L. A quantitative genetic model for the origin of mating preferences. Evolution. 38:1984;1283-1295
17. Hoikkala A., Isoherranen E. Variation and repeatability of courtship song characters among wild-caught and laboratory-reared Drosophila montana and D. littoralis males (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect Behav. 10:1997;193-202
18. Hosken D.J., Blanckenhorn W.U., Garner T.W.J. Heteropopulation males have a fertilization advantage during sperm competition in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria). Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 269:2002;1701-1707
19. Houde A.E., Endler J.A. Correlated evolution of female choice between two guppy populations. Science. 248:1990;1405-1408
20. Ingvarsson P.K., Whitlock M.C. Heterosis increases the effective migration rate. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 267:2000;1321-1326
21. Iwasa Y., Pomiankowski A., Nee S. The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The "handicap" principle. Evolution. 45:1991;1431-1442
22. Karan D., Dahiya N., Munjal A.K., Gibert P., Moreteau B., Parkash R., David J.R. Desiccation and starvation tolerance of adult Drosophila opposite latitudinal clines in natural populations of three different species. Evolution. 52:1998;825-831
23. Kirkpatrick M. Good genes and direct selection in the evolution of mating preferences. Evolution. 50:1996;2125-2140
24. Kirkpatrick M., Barton N.H. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;1282-1286
25. Kokko H., Brooks R., McNamara J.M., Houston A.I. The sexual selection continuum. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 269:2002;1331-1340
26. Kondrashov A.S. Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. III. Mating preferences and some general remarks. J. Theor. Biol. 131:1988;487-496
27. Lesna I., Sabelis M.W. Diet-dependent female choice for males with 'good genes' in a soil predatory mite. Nature. 401:1999;581-584
28. Luyten P.H., Liley N.R. Sexual selection and competitive success of male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) from four Trinidad populations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28:1991;329-336
29. MacDougall-Shackleton E.A., Derryberry E.P., Hahn T P. Nonlocal male mountain white-crowned sparrows have lower paternity and higher parasite loads than males singing local dialect. Behav. Ecol. 13:2002;682-689
30. Malhotra A., Thorpe R.S. Experimental detection of rapid evolutionary response in natural lizard populations. Nature. 353:1991;347-357
31. Markow T.A., Toolson E.C. Temperature effects on epicuticular hydrocarbons and sexual isolation in Drosophila mojavensis. Barker J.S.F. Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila. 1990;315-333 Plenum Press, New York
32. Møller A.P., Alatalo R.V. Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 266:1999;85-91
33. Morgan M.T. Genome-wide deleterious mutation favors dispersal and species integrity. Heredity. 89:2002;253-257
34. Nagy E.S. Selection for native characters in hybrids between locally adapted plant subspecies. Evolution. 51:1997;1469-1480
35. Olvido A.E., Mousseau T.A. Effect of rearing environment on calling-song plasticity in the striped ground cricket. Evolution. 49:1995;1271-1277
36. Phillips P.C. Maintenance of polygenetic variation via a migration-selection balance under uniform selection. Evolution. 50:1996;1334-1339
37. Proulx S.R. Mating systems and the evolution of niche breadth. Am. Nat. 154:1999;89-98
38. Proulx S.R. Female choice via indicator traits easily evolves in the face of recombination and migration. Evolution. 55:2001;2401-2411
39. Ptacek M.B., Travis J. Mate choice in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna. Evolution. 51:1997;1217-1231
40. Rätti O., Hovi M., Lundberg A., Tegelström H., Alatalo R.V. Extra-pair paternity and male characteristics in the pied flycatcher. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37:1995;419-425
41. Reinhold K., Engqvist L., Misof B., Kurtz J. Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 266:1999;1341-1345
42. Riechert S.E., Hall R.F. Local population success in heterogeneous habitats reciprocal transplant experiments completed on a desert spider. J. Evol. Biol. 13:2000;541-550
43. Rowe L., Houle D. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 263:1996;1415-1421
44. Rupp J.C., Woolhouse M.E.J. Impact of geographical origin on mating behaviour in two species of Biomphalaria (Planorbidae: Gastropoda). Anim. Behav. 58:1999;1247-1251
45. Saccheri I.J., Brakefield P.M. Rapid spread of immigrant genomes into inbred populations. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 269:2002;1073-1078
46. Shirley M.D.F., Sibly R.M. Genetic basis of a between-environment trade-off involving resistance to cadmium in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 53:1999;826-836
47. Storfer A., Cross J., Rush V., Caruso J. Adaptive coloration and gene flow as a constraint to local adaptation in the streamside salamander, Ambystoma barbouri. Evolution. 53:1999;889-898
48. Taylor G.C., Williams G.C. The lek paradox is not resolved. Theor. Popul. Biol. 22:1982;392-409
49. Vamosi S.M., Schluter D. Sexual selection against hybrids between sympatric stickleback species evidence from a field experiment. Evolution. 53:1999;874-879
50. Van Zandt P.A., Mopper S. A meta-analysis of adaptive deme formation in phytophagous insect populations. Am. Nat. 152:1998;595-604
51. Verhulst S., van Eck H.M. Gene flow and immigration rate in an island population of great tits. J. Evol. Biol. 9:1996;771-782
52. Wagner W.E., Hoback W.W. Nutritional effects on male calling behaviour in the variable field cricket. Anim. Behav. 57:1999;89-95