Effects of the neonatal intensive care unit on auditory attention and distraction

Clinics in Perinatology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 243-260

  Gray, Lincoln ^a   Philbin, M Kathleen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PERINATAL CARE; PERINATAL DEVELOPMENT; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 4143140847     PISSN: 00955108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2004.04.013     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Als H., Duffy F., McAnulty G. Behavioral differences between preterm and full term newborns as measured with the APIB system score: I. Infant Behav Dev. 11:1988;305-318
2. Taylor H.G., et al. Longitudinal outcomes of very low birth weight: neuropsychological findings. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 10(2):2004;149-163
3. Chapieski M.L., Evankovich K.D. Behavioral effects of prematurity. Semin Perinatol. 21(3):1997;221-239
4. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am. 49(2 Suppl 2):1971;467-477
5. Green D.M. Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures. J Acoust Soc Am. 87(6):1990;2662-2674
6. Green D.M. Maximum-likelihood procedures and the inattentive observer. J Acoust Soc Am. 97(6):1995;3749-3760
7. Werner L.A. Interpreting developmental psychoacoustics. Werner L.A., Ruber E.W. Developmental psychoacoustics. 1992;47-88 American Psychological Assn, Washington, DC
8. Gray L. An auditory psychometric function from newborn chicks. J Acoust Soc Am. 91(3):1992;1608-1615
9. Zwicker E., Flottorp G., Stevens S. Critical bandwidth in loudness summation. J Acoust Soc Am. 29:1957;548-557
10. Birnholz J.C., Benacerraf B.R. The development of human fetal hearing. Science. 222(4623):1983;516-518
11. Igarashi Y., Ishii T. Embryonic development of the human organ of Corti: electron microscopic study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2(1):1980;51-62
12. Gerhardt K.J., Abrams R.M. Fetal exposures to sound and vibroacoustic stimulation. J Perinatol. 20(8 Pt 2):2000;S21-S30
13. Griffiths S.K., et al. The perception of speech sounds recorded within the uterus of a pregnant sheep. J Acoust Soc Am. 96(4):1994;2055-2063
14. Gerhardt K.J. Characteristics of the fetal sheep sound environment. Semin Perinatol. 13(5):1989;362-370
15. Jusczyk P. The discovery of spoken language. 1997;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
16. Moon C., Fifer W.P. Evidence of transnatal auditory learning. J Perinatol. 20:2000;S37-S44
17. Lecanuet J.-P., Granier-Deferre C., Musnel M.-C. Differential fetal auditory reactiveness as a function of stimulus characteristic and state. Semin Perinatol. 13:1989;421-429
18. Hepper P., Scott D., Shahidullah S. Newborn and fetal response to maternal voice. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 11:1993;47-155
19. DeCasper A., et al. Fetal reactions to recurrent maternal speech. Infant Behav Dev. 17:1994;159-164
20. Lecanuet J.P., et al. Fetal discrimination of low-pitched musical notes. Dev Psychobiol. 36(1):2000;29-39
21. Banks M. Optics, receptors, and spatial vision in human vision. Werner L., Rubel E.W. Developmental psychoacoustics. 1992;229-256 American Psychological Assn, Washington, DC
22. Clifton R.K., et al. Multimodal perception in the control of infant reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 20(4):1994;876-886
23. Lickliter R. The role of sensory stimulation in perinatal development: insights from comparative research for care of the high-risk infant. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 21(6):2000;437-447
24. Lickliter R., Bahrick L.E. The development of infant intersensory perception: advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach. Psychol Bull. 126(2):2000;260-280
25. DeCasper A.J., Fifer W.P. Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mothers' voices. Science. 208(4448):1980;1174-1176
26. Querleu D., et al. [Reaction of the newborn infant less than 2 hours after birth to the maternal voice]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 13(2):1984;125-134
27. Spence M., DeCasper A. Prenatal experience with low-frequency maternal voice sounds influences neonatal perception of maternal voice samples. Infant Behav Dev. 16:1987;133-142
28. Spence M., Freeman M. Newborn infants prefer the maternal low-pass filtered voice, but not the maternal whispered voice. Infant Behav Dev. 19:1996;199-212
29. DeCasper A.J., Prescott P.A. Human newborns' perception of male voices: preference, discrimination, and reinforcing value. Dev Psychobiol. 17(5):1984;481-491
30. Brazelton T. Neonatal behavioral assessment scale. 2nd edition:1984;J.B. Lippincott, Philadelphia
31. Als H., et al. Towards a research instrument for the assessment of preterm infants. Fitzgerald H., Lester B., Yogman M. Theory and research in behavioral pediatrics. 1982;35-63 Plenum, New York
32. Philbin M.K., Ballweg D.D., Gray L. The effect of an intensive care unit sound environment on the development of habituation in healthy avian neonates. Dev Psychobiol. 27(1):1994;11-21
33. Bargones J., Werner L. Adults listen selectively; infants do not. Psychonomic Sci. 5:1994;170-174
34. Gray L. Developmental changes in chickens' masked thresholds. Dev Psychobiol. 26(8):1993;447-457
35. Gray L. Interaction between sensory and nonsensory factors in the responses of newborn birds to sound. Werner L., Rubel E.W. Developmental psychoacoustics. 1992;89-112 American Psychological Assn, Washington, DC
36. Litovsky R.Y. Developmental changes in the precedence effect: estimates of minimum audible angle. J Acoust Soc Am. 102(3):1997;1739-1745
37. Elliott L.L. Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am. 66(3):1979;651-653
38. Hawkins D.B., Yacullo S. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Speech Hear Disord. 49(3):1984;278-286
39. Yacullo W.S., Hawkins D.B. Speech recognition in noise and reverberation by school-age children. Audiology. 26(4):1987;235-246
40. Kailes J. Response to petition for rulemaking on classroom acoustics. The Federal Register. November 8, 1999;http://www.access-board.gov/publications/ acoustic.htm. Accessed June 3, 2004
41. Stelmachowicz P.G., et al. The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 43(4):2000;902-914
42. Eisenberg L.S., et al. Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age. J Acoust Soc Am. 107(5 Pt 1):2000;2704-2710
43. Park S.H., et al. Effect of noise on the detection of rib fractures by residents. Invest Radiol. 29(1):1994;54-58
44. Hodge B., Thompson J.F. Noise pollution in the operating theatre. Lancet. 335(8694):1990;891-894
45. Smith A.P., Miles C. The combined effects of occupational health hazards: an experimental investigation of the effects of noise, nightwork and meals. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 59(1):1987;83-89
46. Pichora-Fuller M.K., Schneider B.A., Daneman M. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 97(1):1995;593-608
47. Tun P.A., Wingfield A. One voice too many: adult age differences in language processing with different types of distracting sounds. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 54(5):1999;P317-P327
48. Tun P.A. Fast noisy speech: age differences in processing rapid speech with background noise. Psychol Aging. 13(3):1998;424-434
49. Tun P.A., O'Kane G., Wingfield A. Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. Psychol Aging. 17(3):2002;453-467
50. Murphy D.R., et al. Comparing the effects of aging and background noise on short-term memory performance. Psychol Aging. 15(2):2000;323-334
51. Kemper S., Herman R., Lian C. The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech or noise. Psychol Aging. 18:2000;181-192
52. Gray L.C., et al. Continuum of impulsiveness caused by auditory masking. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 66(3):2002;265-272
53. Breier J.I., et al. Dissociation of sensitivity and response bias in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder during central auditory masking. Neuropsychology. 16(1):2002;28-34
54. Wightman F.L., et al. Children's detection of pure-tone signals: informational masking with contralateral maskers. J Acoust Soc Am. 113(6):2003;3297-3305
55. Als H., Duffy F., McAnulty G. The APIB, an assessment of functional competence in preterm and full term newborns regardless of gestational age at birth:II. Infant Behav Dev. 11:1988;319-331
56. Duffy F.H., Als H., McAnulty G.B. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for gestational age effects in healthy preterm and fullterm infants studied two weeks after expected due date. Child Dev. 61(4):1990;271-286
57. Als H., et al. Manual for assessment of preterm infants' behavior (APIB). Fitzgerald H., Lester B., Yogman M. Theory and research in behavioral pediatrics. 1982;64-133 Plenum, New York
58. Penn A., Shatz C. Principles of endogenous and sensory activity-dependent brain development. The visual system. Lagercrantz H., et al. The newborn brain: neuroscience and clinical applications. 2002;204-225 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
59. Kleberg A., Westrup B., Stjernqvist K. Developmental outcome, child behaviour and mother-child interaction at 3 years of age following Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Intervention Program (NIDCAP) intervention. Early Hum Dev. 60(2):2000;123-135
60. Kleberg A., et al. Indications of improved cognitive development at one year of age among infants born very prematurely who received care based on the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP). Early Hum Dev. 68(2):2002;83-91
61. Als H., et al. Individualized developmental care for the very low-birth-weight preterm infant. Medical and neurofunctional effects. JAMA. 272(11):1994;853-858
62. Als H., et al. A three-center, randomized, controlled trial of individualized developmental care for very low birth weight preterm infants: medical, neurodevelopmental, parenting, and caregiving effects. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 24(6):2003;399-408
63. Buehler D.M., et al. Effectiveness of individualized developmental care for low-risk preterm infants: behavioral and electrophysiologic evidence. Pediatrics. 96(5 Pt 1):1995;923-932
64. Philbin M.K. The influence of auditory experience on the behavior of preterm newborns. J Perinatol. 20(8 Pt 2):2000;S77-S87
65. Philbin M.K., Gray L. Changing levels of quiet in an intensive care nursery. J Perinatol. 22(6):2002;455-460
66. Morris B.H., Philbin M.K., Bose C. Physiological effects of sound on the newborn. J Perinatol. 20(8 Pt 2):2000;S55-S60
67. rd Recommended permissible noise criteria for occupied, newly constructed or renovated hospital nurseries. The Sound Study Group of the National Resource Center. J Perinatol. 19(8 Pt 1):1999;559-563
68. Philbin M.K., Taber K.H., Hayman L.A. Preliminary report: changes in vital signs of term newborns during MR. Am J Neuroradiol. 17(6):1996;1033-1036
69. Werner L.A., Boike K. Infants' sensitivity to broadband noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 109(5 Pt 1):2001;2103-2111
70. Leibold L. Informational masking in infancy [PhD dissertation]. 2004;2 Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
71. Gray L., Philbin M.K. Measuring sound in hospital nurseries. J Perinatol. 20(8 Pt 2):2000;S100-S104