Competition landscapes: Scaling up local biotic and abiotic processes in heterogeneous environments

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 101-111

  Guichard, Frédéric ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Boundary layer; Competition landscape; Individual based model; Mussels; Percolation; Scaling; Spatially explicit simulation; Truncated kernels

Indexed keywords

BENTHOS; COLONIZATION; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); FLOW VELOCITY; MOLLUSC; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 4143093989     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2004.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Archambault P., McKindsey C.W., Bourget E. Large-scale shoreline configuration influences phytoplankton concentration and mussel growth. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 49:1999;193-208
2. Bailey D.J., Otten W., Gilligan C.A. Saprotrophic invasion by the soil-borne fungal plant pathogen Rhizoctonia solani and percolation thresholds. New Phytol. 146:2000;535-544
3. Bascompte J., Solé R. Rethinking complexity: modelling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:1995;361-366
4. Bolker B., Pacala S. Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. Am. Nat. 153:1999;575-602
5. Botsford L.W., Hastings A., Gaines S.D. Dependence of sustainability on the configuration of marine reserves and larval dispersal distance. Ecol. Lett. 4:2001;144-150
6. Butman C.A., Fréchette M., Geyer W.R., Starczack V.R. Flume experiments on food supply to the blue mussel Mytilus edulis l. as a function of boundary-layer flow. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39:1994;1755-1768
7. Cantrell R.S., Cosner C. On the effects of spatial heterogeneity on the persistence of interacting species. J. Math. Biol. 37:1998;103-145
8. Chesson, P., 1997. Making sense of spatial models in ecology. In: Bascompte J., Solé, R. (Eds.), Modeling Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Ecology. Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, TX, pp. 151-166 (Chapter 8).
9. Chesson P. General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theor. Popul. Biol. 58:2000;211-237
10. Chesson, P., Donahue, M.J., Melbourne, B., Sears, A.L., 2005. Scale transition theory for understanding mechanisms in metacommunities. In: Holyoak, M., Leibold, M.A., Holt, R.D. (Eds.), Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
11. Cusson M., Bourget E. Influence of topographic heterogeneity and spatial scales on the structure of the neighbouring intertidal endobenthic macrofaunal community. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 150:1997;181-193
12. Czárán T., Bartha S. Spatiotemporal dynamic models of plant population and communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:1992;38-42
13. Fréchette M., Bourget E. Food-limited growth of Mytilus edulis l. in relation to the benthic boundary layer. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42:1985;1166-1170
14. Fréchette M., Butman C.A., Geyer W.R. The importance of boundary-layer flows in supplying phytoplankton to the benthic suspension feeder, Mytilus edulis l. Limnol. Oceanogr. 34:1989;19-36
15. Guichard F., Bourget E. Topographic heterogeneity, hydrodynamics, and benthic community structure. a scale-dependent cascade Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 171:1998;59-70
16. Guichard F., Bourget E., Robert J.-L. Scaling the influence of topographic heterogeneity on intertidal benthic communities. alternate trajectories mediated by hydrodynamics and shading Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 217:2001;27-41
17. Guichard F., Halpin P., Allison G., Lubchenco J., Menge B. Mussel disturbance dynamics. signatures of oceanographic forcing from local interactions Am. Nat. 161:2003;889-904
18. Hastings A., Higgins K. Persistence of transients in spatially structured ecological models. Science. 263:1994;1133-1136
19. Hawkins, A.J.S., Bayne, B.L., 1992. Physiological interrelations, and the regulation of production. In: Gosling, E. (Ed.), The Mussel Mytilus: Ecology, Physiology, Genetics and Culture, Vol. 25: Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 171-222.
20. Law R., Dieckmann U. A dynamical system for neighborhoods in plant communities. Ecology. 81:2000;2137-2148
21. Levin S.A., Grenfell B., Hastings A., Perelson A.S. Mathematical and computational challenges in population biology and ecosystems science. Science. 275:1997;334-343
22. Lockwood D.R., Hastings A., Botsford L.W. The effect of dispersal patterns on marine reserves: does the tail wag the dog? Theor. Popul. Biol. 61:2002;297-309
23. Malamud B.D., Morein G., Turcotte D.L. Forest fires. an example of self-organized critical behavior Science. 281:1998;1840-1842
24. McCann K., Hastings A., Harrison S., Wilson W. Population outbreaks in a discrete world. Theor. Popul. Biol. 57:2000;97-108
25. Neubert M.G., Kot M., Lewis M.A. Dispersal and pattern formation in a discrete-time predator-prey model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 48:1995;7-43
26. Nowell A., Jumars P. Flow environment of aquatic benthos. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:1984;303-328
27. Pascual M., Caswell H. Environmental heterogeneity and biological pattern in a chaotic predator-prey system. J. Theor. Biol. 185:1997;1-13
28. Richards S.A., Wilson W.G., Socolar J.E.S. Selection for intermediate mortality and reproduction rates in a spatially structured population. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 266:1999;2383-2388
29. Roughgarden J. Population dynamics in a spatially varying environment. how population size tracks spatial variation in carrying capacity Am. Nat. 108:1974;649-664
30. Ruel J.J., Ayres M.P. Jensen's inequality predicts effects of environmental variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:1999;361-366
31. Schneider D.C., Walters R., Thrush S., Dayton P. Scale-up of ecological experiments. density variation in the mobile bivalve Macoma liliana J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 216:1997;129-152
32. Seed, R., Suchanek, T.H., 1992. Population and community ecology of mytilus. In: Gosling, E. (Ed.), The Mussel Mytilus: Ecology, Physiology, Genetics and Culture, Vol. 25: Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 87-169 (Chapter 4).
33. Shigesada N., Kawasaki K. Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice. 1997;Oxford University Press, Oxford. (Chapter 4)
34. Stauffer D., Aharony A. Introduction to Percolation Theory. 1992;Taylor & Francis, London
35. Steinberg, E.K., 1997. Challenges and opportunities for empirical evaluation of spatial theory. In: Tilman, D., Kareiva, P. (Eds.), Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions, Vol. 30: Monographs in Population Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 318-332.
36. Tilman D. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology. 75:1994;2-16
37. Van Kirk R.W., Lewis M.A. Integrodifference models for persistence in fragmented habitats. Bull. Math. Biol. 59:1997;107-137