Planar pyrochlore, quantum ice and sliding ice

Journal of Statistical Physics

Volumn 116, Issue 1-4, 2004, Pages 755-772

  Moessner, R ^a   Tchernyshyov, Oleg ^b   Sondhi, S L ^c  

^a LABORATOIRE DE PHYSIQUE STATISTIQUE   (France)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

frustration; ice; quantum magnetism; sliding phase

Indexed keywords

EID: 4143078394     PISSN: 00224715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:JOSS.0000037247.54022.62     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. For an introduction to frustrated magnets, see R. Moessner, Can. J. Phys. 79:1283 (2001); reviews of exact diagonalizations and experiments, respectively, are C. Lhuillier, P. Sindzingre, and J.-B. Fouet, Can. J. Phys. 79:1525 (2001) and P. Schiffer and A. P. Ramirez, Comments Cond. Mat. Phys. 18:21 (1996).
2. For an introduction to frustrated magnets, see R. Moessner, Can. J. Phys. 79:1283 (2001); reviews of exact diagonalizations and experiments, respectively, are C. Lhuillier, P. Sindzingre, and J.-B. Fouet, Can. J. Phys. 79:1525 (2001) and P. Schiffer and A. P. Ramirez, Comments Cond. Mat. Phys. 18:21 (1996).
3. For an introduction to frustrated magnets, see R. Moessner, Can. J. Phys. 79:1283 (2001); reviews of exact diagonalizations and experiments, respectively, are C. Lhuillier, P. Sindzingre, and J.-B. Fouet, Can. J. Phys. 79:1525 (2001) and P. Schiffer and A. P. Ramirez, Comments Cond. Mat. Phys. 18:21 (1996).
4. A. B. Harris, A. J. Berlinsky, and C. Bruder, J. Appl. Phys. 69:5200 (1991).
5. M. Isoda and S. Mori, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67:4022 (1998).
6. B. Canals and C. Lacroix, Phys. Rev. B 61:1149 (2000).
7. A. J. Garcia-Adeva and D. L. Huber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85:4598 (2000).
8. A. Koga and N. Kawakami, Phys. Rev. B 63:144432 (2001).
9. H. Tsunetsugu, Phys. Rev. B 65:024415 (2002).
10. M. Elhajal, B. Canals, and C. Lacroix, Can. J. Phys. 79:1353 (2001).
11. J. Villain, Z. Phys. B 33:31 (1979).
12. J. N. Reimers, Phys. Rev. B 45:7287 (1992); M. P. Zinkin, M. J. Harris, and T. Zeiske, Phys. Rev. B 56:11786 (1997).
13. J. N. Reimers, Phys. Rev. B 45:7287 (1992); M. P. Zinkin, M. J. Harris, and T. Zeiske, Phys. Rev. B 56:11786 (1997).
14. R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80:2929 (1998); Phys. Rev. B 58:12049 (1998).
15. R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80:2929 (1998); Phys. Rev. B 58:12049 (1998).
16. The kagome lattice is based on corner-sharing triangles, rather than tetrahedra. Whereas four spins on a single tetrahedron have an internal ground-state degeneracy, three spins on a triangle do not; however, an extensive degeneracy arises as the ground-state constraints of different triangles can cease to be independent, as happens for coplanar states.
17. J. T. Chalker and J. F. G. Eastmond, Phys. Rev. B 46:14201 (1992); P. Lecheminant, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, L. Pierre, and P. Sindzingre, Phys. Rev. B 56:2521 (1997).
18. J. T. Chalker and J. F. G. Eastmond, Phys. Rev. B 46:14201 (1992); P. Lecheminant, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, L. Pierre, and P. Sindzingre, Phys. Rev. B 56:2521 (1997).
19. E. H. Lieb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18:692 (1967).
20. S. E. Palmer and J. T. Chalker, Phys. Rev. B 64:094412 (2001).
21. J.-B. Fouet, M. Mambrini, P. Sindzingre, and C. Lhuillier, Phys. Rev. B 67:054411 (2003).
22. R. R. P. Singh, O. A. Starykh, and P. J. Freitas, J. Appl. Phys. 83:7387 (1998)
23. E. H. Lieb and P. Schupp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83:5362 (1999).
24. B. Canals and D. Garanin, Eur. Phys. J. B 26:439 (2002)
25. B. Canals, Phys. Rev. B 65:184408 (2002).
26. Ph. Sindzingre, unpublished.
27. C. S. O'Hern, T. C. Lubensky, and J. Toner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83:2745 (1999); L. Golubovic and M. Golubovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80:4341 (1998).
28. C. S. O'Hern, T. C. Lubensky, and J. Toner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83:2745 (1999); L. Golubovic and M. Golubovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80:4341 (1998).
29. D. Arovas and A. Auerbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61:617 (1988).
30. S. Sachdev and N. Read, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5:219 (1991); N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62:1694 (1989); S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 45:12377 (1992).
31. S. Sachdev and N. Read, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5:219 (1991); N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62:1694 (1989); S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 45:12377 (1992).
32. S. Sachdev and N. Read, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5:219 (1991); N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62:1694 (1989); S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 45:12377 (1992).
33. C. H. Chung, J. B. Marston, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 64:134407 (2001).
34. D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61:2376 (1988).
35. C. L. Henley and N.-G. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81:5221 (1998); C. L. Henley, Can. J. Phys. 79:1307 (2001) and forthcoming publication.
36. C. L. Henley and N.-G. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81:5221 (1998); C. L. Henley, Can. J. Phys. 79:1307 (2001) and forthcoming publication.
37. O. Tchernyshyov, O. A. Starykh, R. Moessner, and A. G. Abanov, Phys. Rev. B 68:144422 (2003).
38. O. Tchernyshyov et al., work in progress.
39. Also, these authors point out that several of the smaller systems display symmetries on top of the ones present for the infinite lattice.
40. R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and P. Chandra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:4457 (2000); R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. B 63:224401 (2001).
41. R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and P. Chandra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:4457 (2000); R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. B 63:224401 (2001).
42. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 102:1008 (1956).
43. For an introduction to height representation theory close to the perspective of this paper, see C. Zeng and C. L. Henley, Phys. Rev. B 55:14935 (1997).
44. R. Youngblood, J. D. Axe, and B. M. McCoy, Phys. Rev. B 21:5212 (1980).
45. S. Lukyanov, Phys. Rev. B 59:11163 (1999). The derivation is given in S. Lukyanov and V. Terras, hep-th/0206093.
46. The correlations in this phase are governed by the Gaussian combination of Eqs. (8.5) and (8.6). These lead to a factorized height correlator whose in plane form is different from that for an uncoupled plane only by an overall normalization. That in turn, is small at small interlayer coupling.
47. S. Chakravarty, Phys. Rev. B 66:224505 (2002).
48. S. Chakravarty, R. B. Laughlin, D. K. Morr, and C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. B 63:094503 (2001).
49. O. A. Starykh, R. R. P. Singh, and G. C. Levine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88:167203 (2002).
50. P. Sindzingre, J.-B. Fouet, and C. Lhuillier, Phys. Rev. B 66:174424 (2002).
51. W. Brenig and A. Honecker, Phys. Rev. B 65:140407 (2002).
52. B. Canals, Phys. Rev. B 65:184408 (2002).
53. E. Berg, E. Altman, and A. Auerbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90:147204 (2003).