Temporal prediction of touch instant during observation of human and robot grasping

Brain Research Bulletin

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 770-774

  Craighero, Laila ^a   Bonetti, Francesco ^a   Massarenti, Luca ^a   Canto, Rosario ^a   Fabbri Destro, Maddalena ^a   Fadiga, Luciano ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Action observation; Action prediction; Canonical neurons; Mirror system; Monocular and binocular vision; Motor resonance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; ROBOTICS; TOUCH;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FINGERS; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; JUDGMENT; MOVEMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; REACTION TIME; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTORS; TIME PERCEPTION; TOUCH; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 41249096416     PISSN: 03619230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Borroni P., Montagna M., Cerri G., and Baldissera F. Cyclic time course of motor excitability modulation during the observation of a cyclic hand movement. Brain Res. 1065 (2005) 115-124
2. Castiello U. Grasping a fruit: selection for action. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22 (1996) 582-603
3. Castiello U. Understanding other people's actions: intention and attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29 (2003) 416-430
4. Castiello U., Lusher D., Mari M., Edwards M., and Humphreys G.W. Observing a human or a robotic hand grasping an object: differential motor priming effects. In: Prinz W., and Hommel B. (Eds). Attention and Performance: vol. XIX. Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 315-333
5. Craighero L., Fadiga L., Umiltà C.A., and Rizzolatti G. Evidence for visuomotor priming effect. Neuroreport 8 (1996) 347-349
6. Di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., and Rizzolatti G. Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp. Brain Res. 91 (1992) 176-180
7. Fadiga L., Craighero L., Fabbri-Destro M., Finos L., Cotillon-Williams N., and Smith A.T. Language in shadow. Soc. Neurosci. 1 (2006) 77-89
8. Frak V., Paulignan Y., and Jeannerod M. Orientation of the opposition axis in mentally simulated grasping. Exp. Brain Res. 136 (2001) 120-127
9. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., and Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119 (1996) 593-609
10. Grèzes J., Tucker M., Armony J., Ellis R., and Passingham R.E. Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17 (2003) 2735-2740
11. Iberall T., Bingham G., and Arbib M.A. Opposition space as a structuring concept for the analysis of skilled hand movements. Exp. Brain Res. (Suppl) 15 (1986) 158-173
12. Jackson S.R., Jones C.A., Newport R., and Pritchard C. A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular and memory-guided viewing conditions. Vis. Cogn. 4 (1997) 113-142
13. Jarvelainen J., Schurmann M., Avikainen S., and Hari R. Stronger reactivity of the human primary motor cortex during observation of live rather than video motor acts. Neuroreport 12 (2001) 3493-3495
14. Kilner J.M., Vargas C., Duval S., Blakemore S.J., and Sirigu A. Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement. Nat. Neurosci. 7 (2004) 1299-1301
15. Loftus A., Servos P., Goodale M.A., Mendarozqueta N., and Mon-Williams M. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Exp. Brain Res. 158 (2004) 317-327
16. Murata A., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Raos V., and Rizzolatti G. Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 78 (1997) 2226-2230
17. Napier J.R. The prehensile movements of the human hand. J. Bone Joint Surg. 38B (1956) 902-913
18. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
19. Pozzo T., Papaxanthis C., Petit J.L., Schweighofer N., and Stucchi N. Kinematic features of movement tunes perception and action coupling. Behav. Brain Res. 169 (2006) 75-82
20. Reading R.W. Binocular Vision-Foundations and Applications (1983), Butterworths, Boston
21. Rizzolatti G., and Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27 (2004) 169-192
22. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., and Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn. Brain Res. 3 (1996) 131-141
23. Rizzolatti G., Fogassi L., and Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2 (2001) 661-670
24. Servos P. Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems. Exp. Brain Res. 130 (2000) 35-47
25. Servos P., and Goodale M.A. Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Exp. Brain Res. 54 (1994) 121-132
26. Servos P., Goodale M.A., and Jakobson L.S. The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vis. Res. 32 (1992) 1513-1521
27. Tai Y.F., Scherfler C., Brooks D.J., Sawamoto N., and Castiello U. The human premotor cortex is 'mirror' only for biological actions. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 117-120
28. Tucker M., and Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24 (1998) 830-846
29. Umiltà M.A., Kohler E., Gallese V., Fogassi L., Fadiga L., Keysers C., and Rizzolatti G. I know what you are doing. A neurophysiological study. Neuron 31 (2001) 155-165
30. Wohlschlager P., Haggard P., Gesierich B., and Prinz W. The perceived onset time of self- and other-generated actions. Psychol. Sci. 14 (2003) 586-591