Spike-frequency adaptation generates intensity invariance in a primary auditory interneuron

Journal of Computational Neuroscience

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 113-136

  Benda, Jan ^a   Hennig, R Matthias ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory system; Cricket; Invariance; Model; Spike frequency adaptation

Indexed keywords

CUTOFF FREQUENCY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HIGH PASS FILTERS; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

AUDITORY SYSTEMS; CRICKET; FILTER PROPERTIES; HIGH-PASS FILTER; MEAN INTENSITY; NEURON RESPONSE; SOUND PRESSURES LEVEL; SPIKE FREQUENCY ADAPTATIONS; STEADY STATE; TIME-SCALES;

NEURONS;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CELL FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERNEURON; INTRACELLULAR RECORDING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; SOUND PRESSURE; SPIKE WAVE; STEADY STATE; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 41249090509     PISSN: 09295313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10827-007-0044-8     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Baccus, S. A., & Meister, M. (2002). Fast and slow contrast adaptation in retinal circuitry. Neuron, 36, 909-919.
2. Barlow, H. B. (1961). Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In W. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory communication (pp. 217-234). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Benda, J., & Herz, A. V. M. (2003). A universal model for spike-frequency adaptation. Neural Computation, 15, 2523-2564.
4. Benda, J., Longtin, A., & Maler, L. (2005). Spike-frequency adaptation separates transient communication signals from background oscillations. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 2312-2321.
5. Brenner, N., Bialek, W., & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. (2000). Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transfer. Neuron, 26, 695-702.
6. Cartling, B. (1996). A low-dimensional, time resolved and adapting model neuron. International Journal of Neural Systems, 7, 237-246.
7. Dean, I., Harper, N. S., & McAlpine, D. (2005). Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1684-1689.
8. Doolan, J. M., & Pollack, G. S. (1985). Phonotactic specifity of the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: Intensity-dependent selectivity for temporal parameters of the stimulus. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 157, 223-233.
9. Esch, H., Huber, F., & Wohlers, D. W. (1980). Primary auditory neurons in crickets: Physiology and central projections. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 137, 27-38.
10. Fairhall, A. L., Lewen, G. D., Bialek, W., & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R. (2001). Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature, 412, 787-792.
11. Fourcaud-Trocmé, N., Hansel, D., van Vreeswijk, C., & Brunel, N. (2003). How spike generation mechanisms determine the neuronal response to fluctuating inputs. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 11628-11640.
12. French, A. S., Höger, U., Sekizawa, S. I., & Torkkeli, P. H. (2001). Frequency response functions and information capacities of paired spider mechanoreceptor neurons. Biological Cybernetics, 85, 293-300.
13. French, A. S., & Torkkeli, P. H. (1994). The time course of sensory adaptation in the cockroach tactile spine. Neuroscience Letters, 178, 147-150.
14. Fuhrmann, G., Markram, H., & Tsodyks, M. (2002). Spike frequency adaptation and neocortical rhythms. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 761-770.
15. Gabbiani, F., & Krapp, H. G. (2006). Spike-frequency adaptation and intrinsic properties of an identified, looming-sensitive neuron. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 2951-2962.
16. Gabbiani, F., Krapp, H. G., Hatsopoulos, N., Mo, C. H., Koch, C., & Laurent, G. (2004). Multiplication and stimulus invariance in a looming-sensitive neuron. Journal of physiology Paris, 98, 19-34.
17. Hennig, R. M. (1988). Ascending auditory interneurons in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus (Walker): Comparative physiology and direct connections with afferents. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 163, 135-143.
18. Hennig, R. M. (2003). Acoustic feature extraction by cross-correlation in crickets? Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 189, 589-598.
19. Hennig, R. M., & Weber, T. (1997). Filtering of temporal parameters of the calling song by cricket females of two closely related species: A behavioural analysis. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 180, 621-630.
20. Horseman, G., & Huber, F. (1994a). Sound localisation in crickets I: Contralateral inhibition of an ascending auditory interneuron (AN1) in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 175, 389-398.
21. Horseman, G., & Huber, F. (1994b). Sound localisation in crickets II: Modelling the role of a simple neural network in the prothoracic ganglion. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 175, 399-413.
22. Huber, F., Moore, T. E., & Loher, W. (1989). Cricket behavior and neurobiology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23. + inactivation and variance adaptation in salamander retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 1506-1516.
24. Knight, B. W. (1972). Dynamics of encoding in a population of neurons. Journal of General Physiology, 59, 734-766.
25. Kvale, M. N., & Schreiner, C. E. (2004). Short-term adaptation of auditory receptive fields to dynamic stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 604-612.
26. Laughlin, S. B. (1989). The role of sensory adaptation in the retina. Journal of Experimental Biology, 146, 39-62.
27. Maravall, M., Petersen, R. S., Fairhall, A. L., Arabzadeh, E., & Diamond, M. E. (2007). Shifts in coding properties and maintenance of information transmission during adaptation in barrel cortex. PLoS Biology, 5(2), e19.
28. Marsat, G., & Pollack, G. S. (2005). Effect of the temporal pattern of contralateral inhibition on sound localization cues. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 6137-6144.
29. Nelken, I., Fishbach, A., Las, L., Ulanovsky, N., & Farkas, D. (2003). Primary auditory cortex of cats: Feature detection or something else? Biological Cybernetics, 89, 397-406.
30. Nelson, M. E., Xu, Z., & Payne, J. R. (1997). Characterization and modeling of P-type electrosensory afferent responses to amplitude modulations in a wave-type electric fish. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 181, 532-544.
31. Park, T. J., Klug, A., Holinstat, M., & Grothe, B. (2004). Interaural level difference processing in the lateral superior olive and the inferior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 289-301.
32. Pollack, G. S. (1988). Selective attentiion in an insect auditory neuron. Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 2635-2639.
33. Pollack, G. S., & El-Feghaly, E. (1993). Calling song recognition in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: Comparison of the effects of stimulus intensity and sound spectrum on selectivity for temporal patterns. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 171, 759-765.
34. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical recipes in C (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Reinagel, P. (2001). Neurobiology: The many faces of adaptation. Nature, 412, 776-777.
36. Römer, H., & Krusch, M. (2000). A gain-control mechanism for processing of chorus sounds in the afferent auditory pathway of the bushcricket Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 186, 181-191.
37. Sanchez-Vives, M. V., Nowak, L. G., & McCormick, D. A. (2000). Membrane mechanisms underlying contrast adaptation in cat area 17 in vivo. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 4267-4285.
38. Schildberger, K. (1984). Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 155, 171-185.
39. Schildberger, K., & Hörner, M. (1988). The function of auditory neurons in cricket phonotaxis. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 163, 621-631.
40. Smirnakis, S. M., Berry, M. J., Warland, D. K., Bialek, W., & Meister, M. (1997). Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature, 386, 69-73.
41. 2+ dynamics in a cricket auditory neuron: An example of chemical computation. Science, 263, 823-826.
42. Solomon, S. G., Peirce, J. W., Dhruv, N. T., & Lennie, P. (2004). Profound contrast adaptation early in the visual pathway. Neuron, 42, 155-162.
43. Ulanovsky, N., Las, L., Farkas, D., & Nelken, I. (2004). Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 10440-10453.
44. Wang, X. J. (1998). Calcium coding and adaptive temporal computation in cortical pyramidal neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 1549-1566.
45. Weber, T., Thorson, J., & Huber, F. (1981). Auditory behaviour of the cricket I dynamics of compensated walking and discrimination paradigms on the kramer treadmill. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 141, 215-232.
46. Wiskott, L. (2003). Slow feature analysis: A theoretical analysis of optimal free responses. Neural Computation, 15, 2147-2177.
47. Wohlers, D. W., & Huber, F. (1982). Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket, Gryllus campestris L. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 146, 161-173.
48. Xu, Z., Payne, J. R., & Nelson, M. E. (1996). Logarithmic time course of sensory adaptation in electrosensory afferent nerve fibers in a weakly electric fish. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 2020-2032.