Femoral revision using long hydroxyapatite-coated interlocking stem

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 128, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 355-362

  Malhotra, R ^a   Dua, Aman ^a   Kiran, Krishna E ^a   Bhan, S ^a  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Hydroxyapatite coated stem; Interlocking femoral stem; Revision total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE; INDOMETACIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FEMUR SHAFT; FEMUR SHAFT FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IOTA INTERLOCKING FEMORAL STEM; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 41149177717     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-007-0334-7     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barrack RL (2003) Orthopaedic crossfire-stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: In the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 18(3):98-100
2. Berry DJ (1999) Epidemiology: Hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am 30(2):183-190
3. Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, Rubman MH, Dorr LD (1993) Post mortem comparative analysis of titanium and hydroxyapatite porous coated femoral implants retrieved from the same patient. J Arthroplasty 8:203-211
4. Bolognesi MP, Pietrobon R, Clifford PE, Vail TP (2004) Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 86-A(12):2720-2725
5. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ecotopic ossification following total hip replacement: Incidence and method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 55-A:1629-1632
6. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Marley MT, Feinberg JR (1998) Hydroxyapatite in total hip arthroplasty. Clinical results and critical issues. Clin Orthop 355:200-211
7. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Marley MT, Geesvik R (1998) Hydroxyapatite femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty. 10-13 year follow up. Clin Orthop 393:101-111
8. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Feinberg JR, Marley MT (2001) Hydroxyapatite coated stems in younger and older patients with hip arthritis. Clin Orthop 405:92-100
9. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 243:127
10. D'Antonio JA, Mc Carthy JC, Bargar WL et al (1993) Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 296:133
11. Dominic Meek RM, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Greidanus NV, Duncan CP (2004) Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 86-A:480-485
12. Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fracture of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293
13. Egan KJ, Di Cesare PE (1995) Intraoperative complications of revision hip arthroplasty using a fully porous-coated straight cobalt-chrome femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 10(Suppl):S45-S51
14. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 257:107-128
15. Engh CA, Culpepper WJ II, Kassapidis E (1998) Revision of loose cementless femoral prostheses to larger porous coated components. Clin Orthop 347:168-178
16. Engh CA Jr, Young AM, Engh CA Sr, Hopper RH Jr (2003) Clinical consequence of stress shielding after porous coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 417:157-163
17. Fitzgerald RH Jr, Brindley GW, Kavanagh BF (1988) The uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Intraoperative femoral fractures. Clin Orthop 235:61-66
18. Furukawa T, Matsusue Y, Yasunaga T et al (2000) Histomorphometric study on high-strength hydroxyapatite/poly(l -lactide) composite rods for internal fixation of bone fractures. J Biomed Mater Res 50:410-419
19. Geesink RGT, Hoefnagels NHM (1995) Six-year results of hydroxyapatite coated total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 77-B:534-547
20. Gruen TA, Mc Neice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) "Modes of failture" of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17-27
21. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 51-A:737-755
22. Harris WH (1992) Will stress shielding limit the longevity of cemented femoral components of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop 274:120-123
23. Kilgus DJ, Namba RS, Gorek JE et al (1990) Total hip replacement for patients who have ankylosing spondylitis: The importance of formation of heterotopic bone and of the durability of fixation of cemented components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 72-A:834-839
24. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, Lauro GR (1994) Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 76-A:965-973
25. Malkani AL, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME, Wallrichs SL (1996) Femoral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, long-stem prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 11:411-418
26. Moreland JR, Bernstein ML (1995) Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop 319:141-150
27. Moreland JR, Moreno MA (2001) Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: Minimum 5 years follow up. Clin Orthop 393:194-201
28. Moroni A, Faldini C, Piras F, Giannini S (2000) Risk factors for intraoperative femoral fractures during total hip replacement. Ann Chir Gynaecol 89:113-118
29. Morrey BF, Kavanagh BF (1992) Complications with revision of the femoral component of total hip arthroplasty. Comparison between cemented and uncemented techniques. J Arthroplasty 7:71-79
30. Ng FY, Chiu KY, Yau WP, Ng TP, Tang WM (2004) Extensively coated femoral components in revision hip arthroplasty: Follow-up study of 23 patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 12(2):168-172
31. Palm L, Jacobsson SA, Ivarsson I (2002) Hydroxyapatite coating improves 8 to 10 year performance of the link RS cementless femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 17(2):172-175
32. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J (1999) Minimum 10-year results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 369:230-242
33. Rahbek O, Overgaard S, Lind M, Bendix K, Bunger C, Soballe K (2001) Sealing effect of hydroxyapatite coating on peri-implant migration of particles. An experimental study in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 83-B:441-447
34. Scott DF, Jaffe WL (1996) Host bone responses to porous coated cobalt chrome and hydroxyapatite coated titanium femoral components in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11:429-437
35. Soballe K (1996) Editorial. The current status of hydroxyapatite coating of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 78-B:689-691
36. Taylor JK (1994) Hydroxyapatite vs porous coating: HA as a biological gasket - a canine study of implant fixation and osteolysis. Read at the state of the art in hip and knee replacement meeting: 16 March, Breckenridge
37. Tisdel CL, Goldberg VM, Parr JA et al (1994) The influence of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate coating on bone growth into titanium fiber metal implants. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 76-A:159-171
38. Trikha SP, Singh S, Raynham O, Lewis JC, Edge AJ (2004) Use of an hydroxyapatite-coated stem in a patient with an infected nonunion of a periprosthetic femoral fracture with massive bone loss. A case report J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 86-A:1783-1786
39. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG (2002) Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(4):134-137