Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users' motor and vision capabilities

UIST: Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Softaware and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 231-240

  Gajos, Krzysztof Z ^a   Wobbrock, Jacob O ^a,b   Weld, Daniel S ^a  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision theory; Motor impairments; Multiple impairments; Optimization; Supple; Vision impairments

Indexed keywords

MOTOR IMPAIRMENTS; MULTIPLE IMPAIRMENTS; VISION CAPABILITIES; VISION IMPAIRMENTS;

AUTOMATION; DECISION THEORY; MODEL CHECKING; OPTIMIZATION; STEREO VISION;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

EID: 41149169136     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1294211.1294253     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Accot, J. and S. Zhai. Refining Fitts' law models for bivariate pointing. Proc. CHI'03,193-200, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM Press.
2. Anson, D. Alternative Computer Access: A Guide to Selection. Davis FA, 1996.
3. Bergman, E. and E. Johnson. Towards Accessible HumanComputer Interaction. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 5(1), 1995.
4. Carter, S., A. Hurst, J. Mankoff, and J. Li. Dynamically adapting GUIs to diverse input devices. Proc. Assets'06, 63-70, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press.
5. Chicowski, E. It's all about access. Alaska Airlines Magazine, 28(12):26-31, 80-82, 2004.
6. Dawe, M. Desperately seeking simplicity: how young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies. Proc. CHI'06, 1143-1152, 2006.
7. Fichten, C., M. Barile, J. Asuncion, and M. Fossey. What government, agencies, and organizations can do to improve access to computers for postsecondary students with disabilities: recommendations based on Canadian empirical data. Int J Rehabil Res, 23(3):191-9, 2000.
8. Gajos, K. and D. S. Weld. Supple: automatically generating user interfaces. Proc. IUI'04,93-100, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 2004. ACM Press.
9. Gajos, K. and D. S. Weld. Preference elicitation for interface optimization. Proc. UIST'05, Seattle, WA, USA, 2005.
10. Gajos, K., A. Wu, and D. S. Weld. Cross-device consistency in automatically generated user interfaces. In Proceedings of Workshop on Multi-User and Ubiquitous User Interfaces (MU3I'05), 2005.
11. Gregor, P., A. Newell, and M. Zajicek. Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people. Proc. Assets'02, 151-156, 2002.
12. Grossman, T. and R. Balakrishnan. A probabilistic approach to modeling two-dimensional pointing. ACM Trans. Comp.-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(3):435-459, 2005.
13. Gump, A., M. LeGare, and D. L. Hunt. Application of fitts' law to individuals with cerebral palsy. Percept Mot Skills, 94(3 Pt 1):883-895, June 2002.
14. Harada, S., J. A. Landay, J. Malkin, X. Li, and J. A. Bilmes. The vocal joystick:: evaluation of voice-based cursor control techniques. Proc. Assets'06, 197-204, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press.
15. Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. H. Friedman. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer, August 2001.
16. Hornof, A., A. Cavender, and R. Hoselton. Eyedraw: a system for drawing pictures with eye movements. Proc. Assets'04, 86-93, 2004.
17. Hwang, F. S. Keates, P. Langdon, and J. Clarkson. Mouse movements of motion-impaired users: a submovement analysis. Proc. Assets'04, 102-109, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press.
18. International Organization for Standardization. 9241-9 Ergonomie requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices, 2000.
19. Keates, S., P. Clarkson, L. Harrison, and P. Robinson. Towards a practical inclusive design approach. ACM Press New York, NY, USA, 2000.
20. Koester, H. Abandonment of speech recognition by new users. Proc. RESNA '03, 2003.
21. Kurniawan, S., A. King, D. Evans, and P. Blenkhorn. Design and user evaluation of a joystick-operated full-screen magnifier. Proc. CHI'03, 25-32, 2003.
22. Law, C., A. Sears, and K. Price. Issues in the categorization of disabilities for user testing. Proc. HCIIntl., 2005.
23. Mace, R., G. Hardie, P. Jaine, and N. C. S. U. C. for Universal Design. Accessible Environments: Toward Universal Design. Center for Accessible Housing, North Carolina State University, 1990.
24. Mackenzie, S. I., and W. Buxton. Extending fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks. Proc. CHI '92, 219-226, New York, NY, USA, 1992. ACM Press.
25. Nichols, J., B. A. Myers, M. Higgins, J. Hughes, T. K. Harris, R. Rosenfeld, and M. Pignol. Generating remote control interfaces for complex appliances. Proc. UIST'02, Paris, France, 2002.
26. Phillips, B. and H. Zhao. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol, 5(1):36-45, 1993.
27. Scott, I. U., W. J. Feuer, and J. A. Jacko. Impact of graphical user interface screen features on computer task accuracy and speed in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Am. J. of Ophthalmology, 134(6):857-862, December 2002.
28. Sears, A. Layout appropriateness: A metric for evaluating user interface widget layout. Software Engineering, 19(7):707-719, 1993.
29. Smits-Engelsman, B., Rameckers, E., Duysens, and J. Children with congenital spastic hemiplegia obey fitts law in a visually guided tapping task. Experimental Brain Research, 177(4):431-439, March 2007.
30. Stephanidis, C. Towards the Next Generation of UIST: Developing for all Users. HCI Intl., 473-476, 1997.