Detecting deception from neuroimaging signals - a data-driven perspective

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 126-127

  Haynes, John Dylan ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; CRIME; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; FORENSIC MEDICINE; LETTER; NEUROIMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; GYRUS CINGULI; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIE DETECTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 41149167773     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.003     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Sip K.E., et al. Detecting deception: the scope and limits. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12 (2008) 48-53
2. Poldrack R.A. Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 (2006) 59-63
3. Davatzikos C., et al. Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: application to lie detection. Neuroimage 28 (2005) 663-668
4. Kozel F.A., et al. Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biol. Psychiatry 58 (2005) 605-613
5. Ganis G., et al. Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation. Cereb. Cortex 13 (2003) 830-836
6. Haynes J.D., and Rees G. Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7 (2006) 523-534
7. Pollina D.A., et al. Comparison of polygraph data obtained from individuals involved in mock crimes and actual criminal investigations. J. Appl. Psychol. 89 (2004) 1099-1105
8. Ekman P., and O'Sullivan M. Who can catch a liar?. Am. Psychol. 46 (1991) 913-920