The effect of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy on the long-term renal function in donor and recipient: A retrospective study

Transplantation

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 700-703

  Lind, May Y ^a   Zur Borg, Ingrid Mertens ^a   Hazebroek, Eric J ^a   Hop, Wim C J ^a   Alwayn, Ian P J ^a   Weimar, Willem ^a   Ijzermans, Jan N M ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Donor; Laparoscopy; Recipient; Renal function

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PATIENT; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY ISCHEMIA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECIPIENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CREATININE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 25444491498     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000172219.10178.0d     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Terasaki PI, Cecka JM, Gjertson DW, Takemoto S. High survival rates of kidney transplants from spousal and living unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 1995; 333(6): 333.
2. Najarian JS, Chavers BM, McHugh LE, Matas AJ. 20 years or more of follow-up of living kidney donors. Lancet 1992; 340(8823): 807.
3. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995; 60(9): 1047.
4. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Sroka M, et al. Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy-a comparison with the open approach. Transplantation 1997; 63(2): 229.
5. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam PG, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc. 1997; 29(1-2): 138.
6. Sasaki TM, Finelli F, Bugarin E, et al. Is laparoscopic donor nephrectomy the new criterion standard? Arch Surg 2000; 135(8): 943.
7. Odland MD, Ney AL, Jacobs DM, et al. Initial experience with laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Surgery 1999; 126(4): 603.
8. Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 1997; 226(4): 483.
9. London ET, Ho HS, Neuhaus AM, et al. Effect of intravascular volume expansion on renal function during prolonged CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Ann Surg 2000; 231(2): 195.
10. Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC, et al. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1999; 67(5): 722.
11. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Maley WR, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the recipient. Transplantation 2000; 69(11): 2319.
12. Wolf JS, Merion RM, Leichtman AB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2001; 72(2): 284.
13. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam PG, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc. 1997; 29(1-2): 138.
14. Philosophe B, Kuo PC, Schweitzer EJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 1999; 68(4): 497.
15. Goldfarb DA, Matin SF, Braun WE, et al. Renal outcome 25 years after donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2001; 166(6): 2043.
16. Lind MY, IJzermans JNM, Bonjer HJ. Open versus laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation. BJU Int 2002; 89(2): 162.
17. Roodnat JI, Zietse R, Mulder PGH, et al. The vanishing importance of age in renal transplantation. Transplantation 1999; 67(4): 576.
18. Roodnat JI, van Riemsdijk IC, Mulder PG, et al. The superior results of living-donor renal transplantation are not completely caused by selection or short cold ischemia time: a single-center, multivariate analysis. Transplantation 2003; 75(12): 2014.
19. Kirsch AJ, Hensle TW, Chang DT, et al. Renal effects of CO2 insufflation: oliguria and acute renal dysfunction in a rat pneumoperitoneum model. Urology 1994; 43(4): 453.
20. McDougall EM, Monk TG, Wolf JS Jr, et al. The effect of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on renal function in an animal model. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 182(4): 317.
21. Cisek LJ, Gobet RM, Peters CA. Pneumoperitoneum produces reversible renal dysfunction in animals with normal and chronically reduced renal function. J Endourol 1998; 12(2): 95.
22. Altintas F, Tunali Y, Bozkurt P, et al. An experimental study on the relationship of intra-abdominal pressure and renal ischemia. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2001; 16(1): 55.
23. Lee BR, Cadeddu JA, Molnar-Nadasdy G, et al. Chronic effect of pneumoperitoneum on renal histology. J Endourol 1999; 13(4): 279.
24. Hazebroek EJ, Gommers D, Schreve MA, et al. Impact of intraoperative donor management on short-term renal function after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 2002; 236(1): 127.
25. Chiu AW, Chang LS, Birkett DH, Babayan RK. The impact of pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum, and gasless laparoscopy on the systemic and renal hemodynamics. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 181(5): 397.
26. Thadhani R, Pascual M, Bonventre JV. Acute renal failure. N Engl J Med 1996; 334(22): 1448.
27. Williams RH, Thomas CE, Navar LG, Evan AP. Hemodynamic and single nephron function during the maintenance phase of ischemic acute renal failure in the dog. Kidney Int 1981; 19(4): 503.