The multi-layered city: The value of old urban profiles

Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 248-255

  Bontje, Marco ^a   Musterd, Sako ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Amsterdam; Creative knowledge economy; Leipzig; Path dependence

Indexed keywords

EID: 41149131657     PISSN: 0040747X     EISSN: 14679663     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00457.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amt für Statistik und Wahlen (2005), Statistisches Jahrbuch 2005, Stadt Leipzig. Leipzig: Amt für Statistik und Wahlen.
2. Bathelt, H. (2002), The Re-emergence of a Media-industry Cluster in Leipzig. European Planning Studies 10, pp. 583-611.
3. B ontje, M. (2004), Facing the Challenge of Shrinking Cities in East Germany: The Case of Leipzig. GeoJournal 61, pp. 13-21.
4. Boschma, R.A. & R.C. Kloosterman (2005), Further Learning from Clusters. In: R.A. Boschma & R.C. Kloosterman, eds., Learning from Clusters: A Critical Assessment from an Economic-geographical Perspective, pp. 391-405. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
5. Dienst Onderzoek en Statistiek (2005), Amsterdam in Cijfers 2005. Amsterdam: Dienst Onderzoek en Statistiek.
6. Derudder, B., P.J. Taylor, F. Witlox & G. Catalano (2003), Hierarchical Tendencies and Regional Patterns in the World City Network: A Global Analysis of 234 Cities. Regional Studies 37, pp. 875-886.
7. Eurostat (2005a), Urban Audit 2005. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
8. Eurostat (2005b), Urban Audit Perception Survey. Local Perceptions of Quality of Life in 31 European Cities. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
9. Florida, R. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
10. Grimm, F. (1995), Return to Normal: Leipzig in Search of its Future Position in Central Europe. GeoJournal 36, pp. 319-335.
11. Hall, P. (1998), Cities in Civilization. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
12. Hall, P. (2004), Creativity, Culture, Knowledge and the City. Built Environment 30, pp. 256-258.
13. Herfert, G. (2002), Disurbanisierung und Reurbanisierung - Polarisierte Raumentwicklung in der Ostdeutschen Schrumpfungslandschaft. Raumforschung und Raumordnung 60, pp. 334-344.
14. Herfert, G. (2007), Regionale Polarisierung der demographischen Entwicklung in Ostdeutschland - Gleichwertigkeit der Lebensverhältnisse? Raumforschung und Raumordnung 65, pp. 435-455.
15. Herfert, G. & D. Röhl (2001), Leipzig - Region Zwischen Boom und Leerstand. In: K. Brake, J. Dangschat & G. Herfert, eds., Suburbanisierung in Deutschland, pp. 151-162. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
16. Kesteloot, C. (2003), De Stedeliijke Samenleving: Hopelijk op Weg naar de Consensuele Stad. In: S. Musterd & B. de Pater, eds., Strijd om de Ruimte. Conflicten over Water, Grondgebied en Stad, pp. 89-102. Amsterdam: Aksant.
17. Kloosterman, R. & E. Stegmeijer (2005), Delirious Rotterdam: The Formation of an Innovative Cluster of Architectural Firms. In: R.A. Boschma & R.C. Kloosterman, eds., Learning from Clusters: A Critical Assessment from an Economic-geographical Perspective, pp. 203-224. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
18. Mahoney, J. (2000), Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29, pp. 507-548.
19. Mak, G. (2003), Amsterdam as the 'Compleat Citie': A City Plan Read in Five Episodes. In: S. Musterd & W. Salet, eds., Amsterdam Human Capital, pp. 31-48. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
20. Massey, D. (1979), In What Sense a Regional Problem? Regional Studies 13, pp. 233-243.
21. Meert, H. (2000), Rural Community Life and the Importance of Reciprocal Survival Strategies. Sociologia Ruralis 40, pp. 319-338.
22. Molotch, H., W. Freudenburg & K.E. Paulsen (2000), History Repeats Itself, but How? City Character, Urban Tradition, and the Accomplishment of Place. American Sociological Review 65, pp. 791-823.
23. Musterd, S., M. Bontje & W. Ostendorf (2006), The Changing Role of Old and New Urban Centers: The Case of the Amsterdam Region. Urban Geography 27, pp. 360-387.
24. N uissl, H. & D. R ink (2003), Urban Sprawl and Post-socialist Transformation - the Case of Leipzig (Germany). Leipzig: UFZ Centre for Environmental Research.
25. Peck, J. (2005), Struggling with the Creative Class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29, pp. 740-770.
26. Pierson, P. (2000), Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review 94, pp. 251-267.
27. Sassen, S. (2002), Global Networks, Linked Cities. New York: Routledge.
28. Scott, A.J., ed. (2003), Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Scott, A.J. (2004), Cultural Products Industries and Urban Economic Development. Prospects for Growth and Market Contestation in Global Context. Urban Affairs Review 39, pp. 461-490.
30. Scott, A.J. (2006), Creative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Questions. Journal of Urban Affairs 28, pp. 1-17.
31. S immie, J. (2005), Innovation and Space: A Critical Review of the Literature. Regional Studies 39, pp. 789-804.
32. Storper, M. & M. Manville (2006), Behaviour, Preferences and Cities: Urban Theory and Urban Resurgence. Urban Studies 43, pp. 1247-1274.
33. Taylor, P. (2004), World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis. London: Routledge.
34. Usbeck, H. (1996), Entwicklungen und Probleme der Agglomerationsräume in Deutschland - Fallstudie Leipzig. In: ARL, ed., Agglomerationsräume in Deutschland. Ansichten, Einsichten, Aussichten, pp. 304-324. Hannover: Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung.
35. Wagenaar, M. (2003), Between Civic Pride and Mass Society: Amsterdam in Retrospect. In: S. Musterd & W. Salet, eds., Amsterdam Human Capital, pp. 49-66. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.