Folksonomies in knowledge representation and information retrieval;Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval

Information-Wissenschaft und Praxis

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 77-90

  Peters, Isabella ^a   Stock, Wolfgang G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41149129667     PISSN: 14344653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. Al-Khalifa, H.S. (2007). Automatic Documet-Level Semantic Metadata Annotation Using Folksonomies and Domain Ontologies. PhD-Thesis. University of Southampton / School of Electronics and Computer Science.
2. Al-Khalifa, H.S., & Davis, H.C. (2007). Exploring the value of folksonomies for creating semantic metadata. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 3(2007)1, 12-38.
3. Aurnhammer, M., Hanappe, P., & Steels, L. (2006). Augmenting navigation for collaborative tagging with emergent semantics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4273, 58-71.
4. Bar-Ilan, J., Shoham, S., Idan, A., Miller, Y, & Shachak, A. (2006). Structured vs. unstructured tagging - A case study. In: Proceedings of the 15th International WWW Conference. Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop.
5. Beaudoin, J. (2007). Flickr image tagging: Patterns made visible. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 34(2007)1, 26-29.
6. Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30, 107-117.
7. Brooks, C.H., & Montanez, N. (2006a). An analysis of the effectiveness of tagging in blogs. In: Nicolov, N., Salvetti, F., Liberman, M., & Martin, J.H. (eds.): Computation Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs. Papers from the 2006 AAAI Spring Symposium (S. 9-15). Menlo Park, Cal: AAAI Press. (Technical Report SS-06-03. American Association for Artificial Intelligence).
8. Brooks, C.H., & Montanez, N. (2006b). Improved annotation of the blogosphere via autotagging and hierarchical clustering. In: Proceedings of the 15th International World Wide Web Conference (S. 625-632). New York: ACM.
9. Butterfield, D.S., Costello, E., Fake, C., Henderson-Begg, C. J., & Mourachow, S. (2006). Interestingness ranking of media objects. Patentanmeldung Nr. US 2006/0242139 Al. Eingereicht: 8.2.2006. Publiziert: 26.10.2006.
10. Butterfieid, D.S., Costello, E., Fake, C., Henderson-Begg, C.J., Mourachow, S., & Schachter, J.E. (2006). Media object metadata association and ranking. Patentanmeldung Nr. US 2006/0242178 Al. Eingereicht: 8.2.2006. Publiziert: 26.10.2006.
11. Campbell, D.G. (2006). A phenomenological framework for the relationship between the semantic Web and user-centered tagging systems. In: 17th ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop.
12. Capocci, A., & Caldarelli (2007). Folksonomies and clustering in the collaborative system CiteULike. (arXiv:0710.2836v2).
13. Carlin, S.A. (2007): Social Tagging. Schlagwortvergabe durch User als Hilfsmittel zur Suche im Web. Ansatz, Modelle, Realisierungen. - Boizenburg: vwh.
14. Cattuto, C (2006). Semiotic dynamics in online social communities. European Physical Journal C 46(2006)Suppl. 2, 33-37.
15. Cattuto, C., Loreto, V., & Pietronero, L. (2007). Semiotic dynamics and collaborative tagging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(2007)5, 1461-1464.
16. Christiaens, S. (2006). Metadata mechanisms: From ontology to folksonomy ... and back. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4277, 199-207.
17. Culliss, G.A. (1997). Method for organizing information. Patent-No. US 6.006.222. Granted: Dec. 21, 1999. Applied: Jan. 8, 1997.
18. st International Workshop on Building Technology Enhanced Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice (TEL-CoPs'06).
19. Dye, J. (2006). Folksonomy: A game of high-tech (and high-stakes) tag. E-Content 29(2006)3, 38-43.
20. Egghe, L. (2005). Power Laws in the Information Production Process: Lotkaian Informetrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
21. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to Informetrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Fichter, D. (2006). Intranet applications for tagging and folksonomies. Online 30(2006)3, 43-45.
23. Fidel, R. (2006). An ecological approach to the design of information systems. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 33(2006)1, 6-8.
24. Furnas, G.W., Fake, C., von Ahn, L., Scnachter, J., Golder, S., Fox, K., Davis, M., Mariow, C., & Naaman, M. (2006). Why do tagging systems work? In: CHI,06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (S. 36-39). New York: ACM.
25. Gendarmi, D., & Lanubile, F. (2006). Community-driven ontology evolution based on folksonomies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4277, 181-188.
26. Golder, S.A., & Huberman, B.A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science 32(2006)2, 198-208.
27. Gordon-Murnane, L. (2006). Social bookmarking, folksonomies, and Web 2.0 tools. Searcher - The Magazine for Database Professionals 14(2006)6, 26-38.
28. Grahl, M., Hotho, A., & Stumme, G. (2007). Conceptual clustering of social bookmarking sites. In: Proceedings of I-KNOW ,07, Graz, Austria, September 5-7, 2007 (S. 356-264).
29. Gruber, T. (2006). Where the social Web meets the semantic Web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4273, 994.
30. Gruber, T. (2007). Ontology of folksonomy: A mash-up of apples and oranges. International Journal on Web Semantics and Information Systems 3(2007)1, 1-11.
31. Guy, M., & Tonkin, E. (2006). Folksonomies: Tidying up tags? D-Lib Magazine 12(2006)1.
32. Hänger, C., & Krätzsch, C. (2007). Collaborative Tagging als Service von Hochschulbibliotheken. In: Ball, R. (Hrsg.): Wissenschaftskommunikation der Zukunft. 4. Konferenz der Zentralbibliothek Forschungszentrum Jülich (S. 123-134). Jülich: Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH / Zentralbibliothek.
33. Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B., & Scott, J. (2005). Social bookmarking tools. A general review. Part 1. D-Lib Magazine, 12(1).
34. Heller, L. (2007). Bibliographie und Sacherschließung in der Hand vernetzter Informationsbenutzer. Bibliothek, 31(2), 162-172.
35. nd International CODATA Symposium on Generalization of Information (S. 150-157).
36. Heymann, P., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2006). Collaborative creation of communal hierarchical taxonomies in social tagging system. InfoLab Technical Report; 2006-10. Stanford: Stanford University / Computer Science Dept.
37. Höhfeld, S., & Kwiatkowski, M. (2007). Empfehlungssysteme aus informationswissenschaftlicher Sicht - State of the Art. Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 58(2007)5, 265-276.
38. Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Schmitz, C., & Stumme, G. (2006a). Information retrieval in folksonomies: Search and ranking. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4011, 411-426.
39. Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Schmitz, C., & Stumme, G. (2006b). Trend detection in folksonomies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4306, 56-70.
40. th International Conference on Conceptual Structures.
41. th ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop. Abstracts of Posters (S. 14-15).
42. Ingwersen, P. (2002). Cognitive perspectives of document representation. In: CoLIS 4: 4th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (S. 285-300). Greenwood Village: Libraries Unlimited.
43. Jäschke, R., Marinho, L., Hotho, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L., & Stumme, G. (2007). Tag recommendations in folksonomies. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4702, 506-514.
44. Jung, S., Herlocker, J.L., & Webster, J. (2007). Click data as implicit relevance feedback in web search. Information Processing & Management, 43, 791-807.
45. Kim, H.G., Hwang, S.H., Kang, Y.K., Kim, H.L., & Yang, H.S. (2007). An agent environment for contextualizing folksonomies in a triadic context. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4496, 728-737.
46. Kim, H.L., Hwang, S.H., & Kim, H.G. (2007). FCA-based approach for mining contextualized folksonomy. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (S. 1340-1345). New York: ACM.
47. Kipp, M.E.I. (2006a). @toread and cool: Tagging for time, task and emotion. In: 17th ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Abstracts of Posters (S. 16-17).
48. Kipp, M.E.I. (2006b). Complementary or discrete contexts in online indexing: A comparison of user, creator and intermediary keywords. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 30(2006)3, in prep.
49. Kipp, M.E.I. (2007). Tagging for health information organisation and retrieval. In: Proceedings of the North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, vol. 1 (S. 63-74).
50. th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science & Technology (Vol. 43), Austin, TX (CD-ROM).
51. Kleinberg, J. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM 46(1999)5, 604-632.
52. Kolbitsch, J. (2007a). Aspects of Digital Libraries. Diss. TU Graz.
53. Kolbitsch, J. (2007b). WordFlickr: A solution to the vocabulary problem in social tagging systems. In: Proceedings of I-MEDIA ,07 and I-SEMANTICS ,07. Graz, Austria, September 5-7, 2007 (S. 77-84).
54. Kroski, E. (2005). The Hive Mind: Folksonomies and user-based tagging. [Blog post; 2005-12-07]. Online: http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2005/ 12/07/the-hive-mind-folksonomies-and-user-based-tagging.
55. Lancaster, F.W. (2003). Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice. Champaign: University of Illinois, 3rd ed.
56. th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (S. 153-154). New York: ACM.
57. Layne, S. (2002). Subject access to art images. In: Baca, M. (ed.): Introduction to Art Image Access (S. 1-19). Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.
58. Lin, X., Beaudoin, J.E., Bui, Y., & Desai, K. (2006). Exploring characteristics of social classification. In: 17th ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop.
59. Lüth, J. (2007). Inhaltserschließung durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer. Ergebnisse eines Tests mit Internetquellen der virtuellen Fachbibliothek EconBiz. In: Ockenfeld, M. (Hrsg.): Information in Wissenschaft, Bildung und Wirtschaft. 29. Online-Tagung der DGI. 59. Jahrestagung der DGI (S. 113-120). Frankfurt am Main: DGI.
60. Lund, B., Hammond, T., Flack, M., & Hannay, T. (2005). Social bookmarking tools (II). A case study - Connotea. D-Lib Magazine, 11(2006)4.
61. th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2007) (S. 283-287). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
62. Macgregor, G., & McCulloch, E. (2006). Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Library Review 55(2006)5, 291-300.
63. MacLaurin, M.B. (2005). Selection-based item tagging. Patentanmeldung Nr. US 2007/0028171 A1. Eingereicht: 29.7.2005. Publiziert: 1.2.2007.
64. Mai, J.M. (2006). Contextual analysis for the design of controlled vocabularies. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 33(2006)1, 17-19.
65. Markey, K. (1986). Subject Access to Visual Resource Collections. Westport: Greenwood.
66. Markkula, M., & Sormunen, E. (2000). End-user searching challenges indexing practices in the digital newspaper photo archive. Information Retrieval 1(2000), 259-285.
67. Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., & Davis, M. (2006). HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (S. 31-40). New York: ACM.
68. Mathes, A. (2004). Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata, Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Urbana-Campaign / Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
69. McFedries, P. (2006). Folk wisdom. IEEE Spectrum, 43(2006)Febr., 80.
70. Merholz, P. (2004). Metadata for the masses. [Blog post, 2004-10-19]. Online: www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000361. php.
71. Mika, P. (2006). Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3729, 522-536.
72. Millen, D.R., Feinberg, J., & Kerr, B. (2006). DOGEAR. Social bookmarking in the enterprise. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (S. 111-120). New York: ACM.
73. Miller, G.A. (1998). Nouns in WordNet, In Fellbaum, C. (ed.), WordNet. An Electronic Lexical Database (S. 23-46). Cambridge, Mass., London: MIT Press.
74. Müller-Prove, M. (2007). Taxonomien und FoIksonomien - Tagging als neues HCI-Element. In i-com, 6(1), 14-18.
75. Morrison, P.J. (2007). Why are they tagging, and why do we want them to? Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 34(2007)1,12-15.
76. Munk, T.B., & Mork, K. (2007). Folksonomy, the power law and the significance of the least effort. Knowledge Organization 34(2007)1,16-33.
77. Murison, J. (2006). Messageboard topic tagging: User tagging of collectively owned community content. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Designing for User experience (art. no 5). New York: American Institute of Graphic Art.
78. Neal, D. (2007). Folksonomies and image tagging: Seeing the future? Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 34(2007)1, 7-11.
79. Niwa, S., Doi, T., & Honiden, S. (2006). Web page recommander systems based on folksonomy mining for ITNG ,06 submissions. In: Third Conference on Information Technology: New Generation (ITNG'06) (S. 388-393). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
80. Noruzi, A. (2006). Folksonomies: (un)controlled vocabulary? Knowledge Organization 33(2006)4, 199-203.
81. Noruzi, A. (2007). Folksonomies: Why do we need controlled vocabulary? Webology 4(2), editorial 12.
82. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0. Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Online: www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/ oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
83. Ornager, S. (1996). The newspaper image database. Empirical supported analysis of users' typology and word association clusters. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (S. 212-218). New York: ACM.
84. Ott, E.S. (2006). Picture tagging. Patentanmeldung Nr. US 2007/0079321 Al. Eingereicht: 17.2.2006. Publiziert: 6.4.2007.
85. Panofsky, E. (1975) Sinn und Deutung in der bildenden Kunst. Köln: DuMont.
86. Panofsky, E. (2006). Ikonographie und Ikonologie. Köln: DuMont.
87. th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
88. Peters, I. (2006a). Inhaltserschließung von Blogs und Podcasts im betrieblichen Wissensmanagement. In Ockenfeld, M. (Hrsg.): Content. 28, Online-Tagung der DGI, 58. Jahrestagung der DGI. Proceedings (S. 143-151). Frankfurt am Main: DGI.
89. Peters, I. (2006b). Against folksonomies: Indexing blogs and podcasts for corporate knowledge management. In: Jezzard, H. (ed.): Preparing for Information 2.0. Online Information 2006. Proceedings (S. 93-97). London: Learned Information Europe.
90. Peters, I. (2007). Web 2.0 und Fachinformation. Folksonomies im Web 2.0. Password 22(2007)5, 10-11.
91. Peters, I. (2008). ASIS&T Annual Meeting 2007: Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Joining Research and Practice: Social Computing and Information Science. Password 23(2008)1, 16-19.
92. Peters, I., & Stock, W.G. (2006). Corporate Blogs im Wissensmanagement. Wissensmanagement 8(2006)6, 40-41.
93. Peters, I., & Stock, W.G. (2007a): Web 2.0 im Unternehmen. Wissensmanagement 9(2007)4 22-25.
94. th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Vol. 45 (S. 1510-1542). (CD-ROM).
95. Peters, I., & Waller, K. (2008). Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in knowledge organization systems. Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis, 59(2008)2, 100-107.
96. Peterson, E. (2006). Beneath the metadata. Some philosophical problems with folksonomies. D-Lib Magazine 12(2006)11.
97. Pluzhenskaia, M. (2006). Folksonomies or fauxsonomies: How social is social bookmarking? In: 17th ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop. Abstracts of Posters (S. 23-24).
98. Quintarelli, E. (2006). Folksonomies: Power to the people, Paper presented at the ISKO Italy UniMIB meeting, Milan, June 24, 2005.
99. Rasmussen, E.M. (1997): Indexing images. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 32, 169-196.
100. Reamy, T. (2006). Folksonomies and complexity theory: Evolved information structures. In: Jezzard, H. (ed.): Preparing for Information 2.0. Online Information 2006. Proceedings (S. 111-113). London: Learned Information Europe.
101. Rocchio, J.J. (1971). Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In: Salton, G. (ed.): The SMART Retrieval System - Experiments in Automatic Document Processing (S. 313-323). Englewood Ciffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
102. Russell, T. (2006). Cloudalicious: Folksonomy over time. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (S. 364). New York: ACM.
103. Schmitz, C., Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., & Stumme, G. (2006). Mining association rules in folksonomies. In: Batagelj, V., Bock, H.H., Ferllgoj, & Žiberna, A. (eds.): Data Science and Classification (S. 261-270). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
104. Schmitz, P. (2006). Inducing ontology from Flickr tags. In: Proceedings of the 15th International WWW Conference. Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop.
105. Shatfort, S. (1986). Analyzing the subject of a picture. A theoretical approach. Cataloguing and Classification Quarterly 6(1986)3, 39-62.
106. Shirky, C. (2004). Folksonomy. [Blog post; 2004-08-24]. Online: http://many.corante.com/archives/2004/08/25/folksonomy.php
107. Shirky, C. (2005). Ontology is overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags. www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html.
108. Sinclair, J., & Cardew-Hall, M. (2008). The folksonomy tag cloud: When is it useful? Journal of Information Science 34(2008)1, 15-29.
109. Smith, G. (2004). Folksonomy: Social classification. [Blog post; 2004-08-03]. http://atomiq.org/archives/2004/08/ folksonomy_social_classification.html.
110. Smith, M.K. (2006). Viewer tagging in art museum: Comparisons to concepts and vocabularies of art museum visitors. In: 17th ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop.
111. Specie, L., & Motta, E. (2007). Integrating folksonomies with the semantic Web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4519, 624-639.
112. Spiteri, L.F. (2006). The use of folksonomies in public library catalogues. The Serials Librarian 51(2006)2, 75-89.
113. Spiteri, L.F. (2007). Structure and form of folksonomy tags: The road to the public library catalogue. Webology 4(2007)2, art. 41.
114. Spyns, P., de Moor, A., Vandenbussche, J., & Meersman, R. (2006). From folksonomies to ontologies: How the twain meet. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4275, 738-755.
115. Stock, W.G. (2006). On relevance distributions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(2006)8, 1126-1129.
116. Stock, W.G. (2007a). Information Retrieval. Informationen suchen und finden. München, Wien: Oldenbourg.
117. Stock, W.G. (2007b). Folksonomies and science communication. A mash-up of professional science databases and web 2.0 services. Information Services & Use, 27(2007)3, 97-103.
118. Stock, W.G., & Stock, M. (2008). Wissensreprä sentation. Informationen auswerten und bereitstellen. München, Wien: Oldenbourg.
119. Stock, W.G., & Weber, S. (2006). Facets of informetrics. Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 57(2006)8, 385-389.
120. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Doubleday (dt. Die Weisheit der Vielen. München: Bertelsmann, 2005).
121. Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. New York: Morrow.
122. Tonkin, E. (2006a). Folksonomies: The fall and rise of plain-text tagging, Ariadne, 47.
123. Tonkin, E. (2006b). Searching the long tail: Hidden structure in social tagging. In: 17th ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop.
124. Trant, J. (2006a). Exploring the potential for social tagging and folksonomy in art museums: Proof of concept. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 12(2006)1, 83-105.
125. Trant, J. (2006b). Social classification and folksonomy in art museums: Early data from the Steve, museum tagger prototype. In: 17th ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop.
126. Vander Wal, T. (2004). Feed on this. [Blog post; 2004-10-03]. www.vanderwal.net/random/category.php?cat=153.
127. Vander Wal, T. (2005). Explaining and showing broad and narrow folksonomies. [Blog post; 2005-02-21]. www.vanderwal.net/random/category.php? cat=153.
128. Veres, C. (2006a). The language of folksonomies: What tags reveal about user classification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3999, 58-69.
129. Veres, C. (2006b). Concept modeling by the masses: Folksonomy structure and interoperability. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4215, 325-338.
130. Voß, J. (2007). Tagging, folksonomy & co. - Renaissance of manual indexing? In: Oßwald, A., Stempfhuber, M., & Wolff, C. (Hrsg.): Open Innovation, Neue Perspektiven im Kontext von Information und Wissen. ISI 2007 (S. 243-254). Konstanz: Universitä tsverlag.
131. Wang, X., Bai, R., & Liao, J. (2007). Chinese weblog pages classification based on folksonomy and support vector machines. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4476, 309-321.
132. Weiss, A. (2005). The power of collective intelligence, netWorker, 9(2005)3, 16-23.
133. Winget, M. (2006). User-defined classification on the online photo sharing site Flickr ... Or, how I learned to stop worrying and love the million typing monkeys. In: 17th ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop.
134. Weller, K., & Peters, I. (2007). Reconsidering relationships for knowledge representation. In: Proceedings of I-KNOW ,07, Graz, Austria, September 5-7, 2007 (S. 493-496).
135. Wu, H., Zubair, M., & Maly, K. (2006). Harvesting social knowledge from folksonomies. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (S. 111-114). New York: ACM.
136. Xu, Z., Fu, Y., Mao, J., & Su, D. (2006). Towards the semantic Web: Collaborative tag suggestions. In: Proceedings of the 15th International WWW Conference. Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop.
137. Yeung, C.M.A., Gibbins, N., & Shadbolt, N. (2008). Mutual contextualization in tripartite graphs of folksonomies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4825, 966-970.
138. Zhang, L., Wu, X., & Yu, Y. (2006). Emergent semantics from folksonomies: A quantitative study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4090, 168-186.