Snap-and-go: Helping users align objects without the modality of traditional snapping

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 301-310

  Baudisch, Patrick ^a   Cutrell, Edward ^a   Hinckley, Ken ^a   Eversole, Adam ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Alignment; Mouse input; Pseudo haptics; Snap dragging; Snapping

Indexed keywords

ALIGNMENT; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MICE (COMPUTER PERIPHERALS);

MOUSE INPUT; PSUEDO HAPTICS; SNAP-DRAGGING; SNAPPING;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

EID: 41149125352     PISSN: 02749696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Accot, J., and Zhai, S. More than dotting the i's Foundations for crossing-based interfaces. In Proc. CHI'02. pp. 73-80.
2. Saudisch, P. The Cage: Efficient construction in 3D using a cubic adaptive grid. In Proc. UIST'96, pp. 171-172.
3. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. & Mackay, W. Reification, Polymorphism and Reuse: Three Principles for Designing Visual Interfaces. In Proc. AVI'00, p.102-109.
4. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Novel Interaction Techniques for Overlapping Windows. In Proc. UIST'02. pp 153-154.
5. Bier, E. and Stone, M. Snap dragging. In Proc. SIG-GRAPH'86, pp. 233-240.
6. Bier, E. Snap-dragging in three dimensions. In Proc. 1990 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pp. 193-204.
7. Blanch, R. Guiard, Y., Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Semantic Pointing: Improving Target Acquisition with Control-Display Ratio Adaptation. In Proc. CHI'04, pp. 519-526.
8. Borning, A. Defining constraints graphically. In Proc. CHI 86,pp. 137-143.
9. Chang, B.-W. and Ungar, D. Animation: From Cartoons to the user interface. In Proc. UIST'93, pp. 45-55.
10. Fitts, P., The Information Capacity of the Human Motor System in Controlling the Amplitude of Movement, Journal of Experimental Psychology, v 47, June 1954, pp. 381-391.
11. Gleicher, M. and Witkin, A. Drawing with constraints. The Visual Computer, 11(1):39-51, 1994.
12. Guiard, Y., Blanch, R., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Object pointing: A complement to bitmap pointing in GUIs. In Proc GI 2004, pp. 9-16.
13. Hudson, S. Adaptive semantic snapping - a technique for semantic feedback at the lexical level. Proc CHI'90, pp. 65-70.
14. Igarashi, T., and Hughes, J.F. A Suggestive Interface for 3D Drawing. In Proc. VIST'01, pp. 173-181.
15. Jul, S. This is a lot easier! Constrained movement speeds navigation. In CHI'03 extended abstracts, pp. 776 - 777.
16. Lécuyer, A., Burkhardt, J.-M., Etienne, L. Feeling Bumps and Holes without a Haptic Interface: the Perception of Pseudo-Haptic Textures. In Proc. CHI 2004. pp 239-247.
17. Lécuyer, A., Coquillart, S., and Kheddar, A. Pseudo-Haptic Feedback: Can Isometric Input Devices Simulate Force Feedback? In Proc. IEEE VR2000, pp. 18-22.
18. Lieberman, H. editor. Your Wish is My Command-Programming by Example. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2001.
19. MacKenzie, I.S. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 1992. 7:91-139.
20. Masui, T. HyperSnapping. In Proc. Symposia on Human-Centric Comp. - Languages and Environ. 2001, pp. 188-194.
21. Michael McGuffin, Ravin Balakrishnan. Acquisition of Expanding Targets. In Proc. CHI'02, pp. 57-64.
22. Nelson. G. Juno, a constraint-based graphics system. Computer Graphics, 19(3):235-243, Proc. SIGGRAPH'85.
23. Raisamo, R. and Räihä, K.-J. A new direct manipulation technique for aligning objects in drawing programs. In Proc. UIST'96, pp. 157-164.
24. Sutherland, I. Sketchpad: A Man Machine Graphical Communication System. PhD thesis, MIT, 1963.
25. Swaminathan, K. and Sato, S. (1997) Interaction design for large displays. In Interactions 4(1): 15 - 24.
26. Thomas, B.H. and P. Calder. Applying cartoon animation techniques to graphical user interfaces. TOCHI 8(3) : 198-222, September 2001.
27. Worden, A., Walker, N., Bharat, K and Hudson, S. Making Computers Easier for Older Adults to Use: Area Cursors and Sticky Icons. In Proc. CHI '97, pp. 266-271.