|
Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 179-185
|
Quantitative comparison between microfluidic and microtiter plate formats for cell-based assays
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BIOASSAY;
BIOCHIPS;
CALCIUM;
CELL IMMOBILIZATION;
HYDRODYNAMICS;
MICROFLUIDICS;
MICROTITER PLATE FORMATS;
OVARY CELLS;
CELLS;
CALCIUM ION;
URIDINE TRIPHOSPHATE;
CALCIUM;
DIVALENT CATION;
LIGAND;
ANIMAL CELL;
ARTICLE;
CALCIUM CELL LEVEL;
CELL ADHESION;
CELL CULTURE;
CELL POPULATION;
HYDRODYNAMICS;
IMMOBILIZED CELL;
MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS;
MICROTITER PLATE ASSAY;
NONHUMAN;
OVARY CELL;
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;
SCREENING;
ANIMAL;
CHEMISTRY;
CHO CELL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CRICETULUS;
CULTURE TECHNIQUE;
HAMSTER;
INSTRUMENTATION;
METABOLISM;
METHODOLOGY;
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;
ANIMALS;
CALCIUM;
CATIONS, DIVALENT;
CELL ADHESION;
CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES;
CHO CELLS;
CRICETINAE;
CRICETULUS;
LIGANDS;
MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES;
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;
URIDINE TRIPHOSPHATE;
|
EID: 41149123287
PISSN: 00032700
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1021/ac701958z Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (25)
|
References (23)
|